Request a copy

Full Text

• Aiello F. Mannarino L. Pupo V. (2019). Innovation and productivity in family firms: evidence from a sample of European firms. Economics of Innovation and New Technology, 29(4), 394–416. https://doi.org/10.1080/10438599.2019.1629533
• Aiello F. Cardamone P. Mannarino L. Pupo V. (2020). Does external R&D matter for family firm innovation? Evidence from the Italian manufacturing industry. Small Business Economics, 57(1), 1–16. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11187-020-00379-z
• Aldrich H. E. Cliff J. E. (2003). The pervasive effects of family on entrepreneurship: Toward a family embeddedness perspective. Journal of Business Venturing, 18(5), 573–596. https://doi.org/10.1016/s0883-9026(03)00011-9
• Amrhein V. Greenland S. McShane B. (2019). Scientists rise up against statistical significance. Nature, 567(7748), 305–307. https://doi.org/10.1038/d41586-019-00857-9
• Anderson B. S. Wennberg K. McMullen J. S. (2019). Enhancing quantitative theory-testing entrepreneurship research. Journal of Business Venturing, 34(5), 105928. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusvent.2019.02.001
• Anderson R. C. Duru A. Reeb D. M. (2012). Investment policy in family controlled firms. Journal of Banking & Finance, 36(6), 1744–1758. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbankfin.2012.01.018
• Anderson R. G. Kichkha A. (2017). Replication, meta-analysis, and research synthesis in economics. American Economic Review, 107(5), 56–59. https://doi.org/10.1257/aer.p20171033
• Anderson R. C. Reeb D. R. (2003). Founding family ownership and firm performance: Evidence from the S&P 500. Journal of Finance, 58(3), 1301–1328. https://doi.org/10.1111/1540-6261.00567
• Arregle J. L. Duran P. Hitt M. A. Van Essen M. (2017). Why is family firms’ internationalization unique? A meta-analysis. Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, 41(5), 801–831. https://doi.org/10.1111/etap.12246
• Arzubiaga U. Kotlar J. De Massis A. Maseda A. Iturralde T. (2018). Entrepreneurial orientation and innovation in family SMEs: Unveiling the (actual) impact of the Board of Directors. Journal of Business Venturing, 33(4), 455-469. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusvent.2018.03.002.
• Asaba S. Wada T. (2019). The contact-hitting R&D strategy of family firms in the Japanese pharmaceutical industry. Family Business Review, 32(3), 277–295. https://doi.org/10.1177/0894486519852449
• Baek H. Y. Fazio P. L (2015). The effect of family ownership and control on equity-based compensation: Evidence from S&P SmallCap firms. Journal of Family Business Management, 3(1), 62–80. https://doi.org/10.1108/JFBM-04-2014-0008
• Balasubramanian N. Lee J. (2008). Firm age and innovation. Industrial and Corporate Change, 17(5), 1019–1047. https://doi.org/10.1093/icc/dtn028
• Bammens Y. Hünermund P. (2020). Nonfinancial Considerations in Eco-Innovation Decisions: The Role of Family Ownership and Reputation Concerns. Journal of Product Innovation Management, 37(5), 431–453. https://doi.org/10.1111/jpim.12550
• Baù M. Block J. Discua Cruz A. Naldi L. (2021). Bridging locality and internationalization – A research agenda on the sustainable development of family firms. Entrepreneurship & Regional Development, 33(7-8): 477–492. https://doi.org/10.1080/08985626.2021.1925846
• Becerra M. Cruz C. Graves C. (2020). Innovation in family firms: The relative effects of wealth concentration versus family-centered goals. Family Business Review, 33(4), 372–392. https://doi.org/10.1177/0894486520953700
• Bendig D. Foege J. N. Endriß S. Brettel M. (2020). The effect of family involvement on innovation outcomes: the moderating role of board social capital. Journal of Product Innovation Management, 37(3), 249–272. https://doi.org/10.1111/jpim.12522
• Bettis R. A. Helfat C. E. Shaver J. M. (2016). The necessity, logic, and forms of replication. Strategic Management Journal, 37(11), 2193–2203. https://doi.org/10.1002/smj.2580
• Bianco M. Bontempi M. E. Golinelli R. Parigi G. (2013). Family firms’ investments, uncertainty and opacity. Small Business Economics, 40(4), 1035–1058. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11187-012-9414-3
• Bijmolt T. H. A. Pieters R. G. M. (2001). Meta-analysis in marketing when studies contain multiple measurements. Marketing Letters, 12(2), 157–169. https://doi.org/10.1023/a:1011117103381
• Block J. H. (2012). R&D investments in family and founder firms: An agency perspective. Journal of Business Venturing, 27(2), 248–265. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusvent.2010.09.003
• Block J. Miller D. Jaskiewicz P. Spiegel F. (2013). Economic and technological importance of innovations in large family and founder firms: An analysis of patent data. Family Business Review, 26(2), 180–199. https://doi.org/10.1177/0894486513477454
• Bosco F. A. Uggerslev K. L. Steel P. (2017). MetaBUS as a vehicle for facilitating meta-analysis. Human Resource Management Review, 27(1), 237–254. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.hrmr.2016.09.013
• Brinkerink J. (2018). Broad search, deep search, and the absorptive capacity performance of family and nonfamily firm R&D. Family Business Review, 31(3), 295–317. https://doi.org/10.1177/0894486518775187
• Brinkerink J. (2021). When shooting for the stars becomes aiming for asterisks: P-hacking in Family Business Research. Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice. https://doi.org/10.1177/10422587211050354
• Broekaert W. Andries P. Debackere K. (2016). Innovation processes in family firms: the relevance of organizational flexibility. Small Business Economics, 47(3), 771–785. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11187-016-9760-7
• Brown S. P. Peterson R. A. (1993). Antecedents and consequences of salesperson job satisfaction: Meta-analysis and assessment of causal effects. Journal of Marketing Research, 30(1), 63–77. https://doi.org/10.1177/002224379303000106
• Cabrera-Suárez K. De Saá-Pérez P. García-Almeida D. (2001). The succession process from a resource-and knowledge-based view of the family firm. Family Business Review, 14(1), 37–48. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1741-6248.2001.00037.x
• Calabrò A. Vecchiarini M. Gast J. Campopiano G. De Massis A. Kraus S.(2019). Innovation in family firms: A systematic literature review and guidance for future research. International Journal of Management Reviews, 21(3), 317–355. https://doi.org/10.1111/ijmr.12192
• Canavati S. Libaers D. Wang T. Hooshangi S. Sarooghi H. (2021). Relationship between human capital, new venture ideas, and opportunity beliefs: A meta-analysis. Strategic Entrepreneurship Journal, 15(3), 454–477. https://doi.org/10.1002/sej.1397
• Carlson K. D. Ji F. X. (2011). Citing and building on meta-analytic findings: A review and recommendations. Organizational Research Methods, 14(4), 696–717. https://doi.org/10.1177/1094428110384272
• Casado-Belmonte M. D. Capobianco-Uriarte M. D. Martínez-Alonso R. Martínez-Romero M. J. (2021). Delineating the path of family firm innovation: Mapping the scientific structure. Review of Managerial Science, 15(5), 2455–2499. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11846-021-00442-3
• Cascio W. F. (2007). Evidence-based management and the marketplace for ideas. Academy of Management Journal, 50(5), 1009–1012. https://doi.org/10.5465/amj.2007.27151942
• Ceipek R. Hautz J. De Massis A. Matzler K. Ardito L. (2021). Digital transformation through exploratory and exploitative internet of things innovations: The impact of family management and technological diversification. Journal of Product Innovation Management, 38(1), 142–165. https://doi.org/10.1111/jpim.12551
• Chen H. L. Hsu W. T. (2009). Family ownership, board independence, and R&D investment. Family Business Review, 22(4), 347–362. https://doi.org/10.1177/0894486509341062
• Cheung M. W. L. (2014a). Fixed-and random-effects meta-analytic structural equation modeling: Examples and analyses in R Behavior Research Methods, 46(1), 29–40. https://doi.org/10.3758/s13428-013-0361-y
• Cheung M. W. L. (2014b). Modeling dependent effect sizes with three-level meta-analyses: A structural equation modeling approach. Psychological Methods, 19(2), 211–229. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0032968
• Cheung M. W. L. (2015). metaSEM: An R package for meta-analysis using structural equation modeling. Frontiers in Psychology, 5, 1521. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2014.01521.
• Cheung M. W. L. Chan W. (2005). Meta-analytic structural equation modeling: a two-stage approach. Psychological Methods, 10(1), 40. https://doi.org/10.1037/1082-989X.10.1.40
• Cheung M. W. L. Cheung S. F. (2016). Random-effects models for meta-analytic structural equation modeling: review, issues, and illustrations. Research Synthesis Methods, 7(2), 140–155. https://doi.org/10.1002/jrsm.1166
• Chrisman J. J. Chua J. H. De Massis A. Frattini F. Wright M. (2015). The ability and willingness paradox in family firm innovation. Journal of Product Innovation Management, 32(3), 310–318. https://doi.org/10.1111/jpim.12207
• Chrisman J. J. Patel P. C. (2012). Variations in R&D investments of family and nonfamily firms: Behavioral agency and myopic loss aversion perspectives. Academy of Management Journal, 55(4), 976–997. https://doi.org/10.5465/amj.2011.0211
• Coad A. (2018). Firm age: A survey. Journal of Evolutionary Economics, 28(1), 13–43.10.1007/s00191-016-0486-0
• Coad A. Segarra A. Teruel M. (2016). Innovation and firm growth: does firm age play a role? Research Policy, 45(2), 387–400. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.respol.2015.10.015
• Combs J. G. Crook T. R. Rauch A. (2019). Meta-analytic research in management: Contemporary approaches, unresolved controversies, and rising standards. Journal of Management Studies, 56(1), 1–18. https://doi.org/10.1111/joms.12427
• Crawford G. C. Skorodziyevskiy V. Frid C. J. Nelson T. E. Booyavi Z. Hechavarria D. M. Li X Reynolds P. Teymourian E. (2022). Advancing entrepreneurship theory through replication: A case study on contemporary methodological challenges, future best practices, and an entreaty for communality. Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice. https://doi.org/10.1177/10422587211057422.
• Croci E. Doukas J. A. Gonenc H. (2011). Family control and financing decisions. European Financial Management, 17(5), 860–897. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-036x.2011.00631.x
• Cucculelli M. Peruzzi V. (2020). Innovation over the industry life-cycle. Does ownership matter? Research Policy, 49(1), 103878. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.respol.2019.103878
• Czarnitzki D. Delanote J. (2013). Young innovative companies: the new high-growth firms? Industrial and Corporate Change, 22(5), 1315–1340. https://doi.org/10.1093/icc/dts039
• Czarnitzki D. Kraft K. (2004). An empirical test of the asymmetric models on innovative activity: who invests more into R&D, the incumbent or the challenger? Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization, 54(2), 153–173. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jebo.2003.01.008
• Daspit J. J. Chrisman J. J. Ashton T. Evangelopoulos N. (2021). Family firm heterogeneity: A definition, common themes, scholarly progress, and directions forward. Family Business Review, 34(3), 296-322. https://doi.org/10.1177/08944865211008350.
• De Massis A. Audretsch D. Uhlaner L. Kammerlander N. (2018a). Innovation with limited resources: Management lessons from the German Mittelstand. Journal of Production Innovation Management, 35(1), 125-146. https://doi.org/10.1111/jpim.12373.
• De Massis A. Di Minin A. Frattini F. (2015). Family-driven innovation: resolving the paradox in family firms. California Management Review, 58(1), 5–19. https://doi.org/10.1525/cmr.2015.58.1.5
• De Massis A. Ding S. Kotlar J. Wu Z. (2018b). Family involvement and R&D expenses in the context of weak property rights protection: an examination of non-state-owned listed companies in China. The European Journal of Finance, 24(16), 1506–1527. https://doi.org/10.1080/1351847x.2016.1200994
• De Saá-Pérez P. Díaz-Díaz N. L. Luis Ballesteros-Rodriguez J. (2012). The role of training to innovate in SMEs. Innovation: Organization & Management, 14(2), 218–230. https://doi.org/10.5172/impp.2012.14.2.218
• Decker C. Günther C. (2017). The impact of family ownership on innovation: evidence from the German machine tool industry. Small Business Economics, 48(1), 199–212. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11187-016-9775-0
• Diéguez-Soto J. Manzaneque M. Rojo-Ramírez A. A. (2016). Technological innovation inputs, outputs and performance: the moderating role of family involvement in management. Family Business Review, 29(3), 327–346. https://doi.org/10.1177/0894486516646917
• Diéguez-Soto J. Garrido-Moreno A. Manzaneque M.(2018). Unravelling the link between process innovation inputs and outputs: the moderating role of family management. Journal of Family Business Strategy, 9(2), 114–127. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jfbs.2017.11.007
• Duran P. Kammerlander N. Van Essen M. Zellweger T. (2016). Doing more with less: Innovation input and output in family firms. Academy of Management Journal, 59(4), 1224–1264. https://doi.org/10.5465/amj.2014.0424
• Dyer W. G. (2018). Are family firms really better? Reexamining “examining the ‘family effect’ on firm performance”. Family Business Review, 31(2), 240–248. https://doi.org/10.1177/0894486518776516
• Ellis P. D. (2010). Effect sizes and the interpretation of research results in international business. Journal of International Business Studies, 41(9), 1581–1588. https://doi.org/10.1057/jibs.2010.39
• Eisend M. (2015). Have we progressed marketing knowledge? A meta-meta-analysis of effect sizes in marketing research. Journal of Marketing, 79(3), 23-40. https://doi.org/10.1509/jm.14.0288.
• Elliott J. H. Synnot A. Turner T. Simmonds M. Akl E. A. McDonald S. Pearson L. (2017). Living systematic review: 1. Introduction—the why, what, when, and how. Journal of Clinical Epidemiology, 91, 23–30. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclinepi.2017.08.010
• Feranita F. Kotlar J. De Massis A. (2017). Collaborative innovation in family firms: Past research, current debates and agenda for future research. Journal of Family Business Strategy, 8(3), 137–156. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jfbs.2017.07.001
• Geyer-Klingeberg J. Hang M. Rathgeber A. (2020). Meta-analysis in finance research: Opportunities, challenges, and contemporary applications. International Review of Financial Analysis, 71, 101524. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.irfa.2020.101524.
• Gigerenzer G. (2004). Mindless statistics. The Journal of Socio-Economics, 33(5), 587–606. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.socec.2004.09.033
• Gómez-Mejía L. R. Haynes K. T. Núñez-Nickel M. Jacobson K. J. Moyano-Fuentes J. (2007). Socioemotional wealth and business risks in family-controlled firms: Evidence from Spanish olive oil mills. Administrative Science Quarterly, 52(1), 106–137. https://doi.org/10.2189/asqu.52.1.106
• Gómez-Mejía L. R. Campbell J. T. Martin G. Hoskisson R. E. Makri M. Sirmon D. G. (2014). Socioemotional wealth as a mixed gamble: Revisiting family firm R&D investments with the behavioral agency model. Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, 38(6), 1351–1374. https://doi.org/10.1002/sej.1397
• Grace J. B. J. Bollen K. A. (2005). Interpreting the results from multiple regression and structural equation models. Bulletin of the Ecological Society of America, 86(October), 283–295. https://doi.org/10.1890/0012-9623(2005)86[283:itrfmr]2.0.co;2
• Greenland S. Schlesselman J. J. Criqui M. H. (1986). The fallacy of employing standardized regression coefficients and correlations as measures of effect. American Journal of Epidemiology, 123(2), 203–208. https://doi.org/10.1093/oxfordjournals.aje.a114229
• Haltiwanger J. Jarmin R. S. Miranda J. (2013). Who creates jobs? Small versus large versus young. Review of Economics and Statistics, 95(2), 347–361. https://doi.org/10.1162/rest_a_00288
• Hansen J. A. (1992). Innovation, firm size, and firm age. Small Business Economics, 4(1), 37-44. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00402214.
• Hansen C. Block J. (2020). Exploring the relation between family involvement and firms’ financial performance: A replication and extension meta-analysis. Journal of Business Venturing Insights, 13, e00158. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbvi.2020.e00158.
• Hansen C. Block J. (2021). Public family firms and capital structure: A meta-analysis. Corporate Governance: An International Review, 29(3), 297-319. https://doi.org/10.1111/corg.12354.
• Hedges L. V. Olkin I. (1985). Statistical methods for meta-analysis. Academic Press.
• Heider A. Hülsbeck M. von Schlenk-Barnsdorf L. (2022). The role of family firm specific resources in innovation: an integrative literature review and framework. Management Review Quarterly. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11301-021-00256-3.
• Henderson R. Cockburn I. (1996). Scale, scope, and spillovers: The determinants of research productivity in drug discovery. The Rand Journal of Economics, 27(1), 32–59. https://doi.org/10.2307/2555791
• Higón D. A. (2012). The impact of ICT on innovation activities: Evidence for UK SMEs. International Small Business Journal, 30(6), 684-699. https://doi.org/10.1177/0266242610374484.
• Hsieh T.-J. Yeh R.-S. Chen Y.-J. (2010). Business group characteristics and affiliated firm innovation: The case of Taiwan. Industrial Marketing Management, 39(4), 560–570. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.indmarman.2008.12.018
• Huergo E. Jaumandreu J. (2004). How does probability of innovation change with firm age? Small Business Economics, 22(3), 193–207. https://doi.org/10.1023/b:sbej.0000022220.07366.b5
• Hussinger K. Issah A.-B. (2019). Firm acquisitions by family firms: A mixed gamble approach. Family Business Review, 32(4), 354–377. https://doi.org/10.1177/0894486519885544
• Ingram A. E. Lewis M. W. Barton S. Gartner W. B. (2016). Paradoxes and innovation in family firms: The role of paradoxical thinking. Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, 40(1), 161–176. https://doi.org/10.1111/etap.12113
• Jaskiewicz P. Dyer W. G. (2017). Addressing the elephant in the room: Disentangling heterogeneity to advance family business research. Family Business Review, 30(2), 73–96. https://doi.org/10.1177/0894486517700469
• Kotlar J. De Massis A. Frattini F. Bianchi M. Fang H. (2013). Technology acquisition in family and nonfamily firms: A longitudinal analysis of Spanish manufacturing firms. Journal of Product Innovation Management, 30(6), 1073–1088. https://doi.org/10.1111/jpim.12046
• Kosmidou V. Ahuja M. K. (2019). A configurational approach to family firm innovation. Family Business Review, 32(2), 154–173. https://doi.org/10.1177/0894486519827738
• Kubota K. Takehara H. (2019). Firm-level innovation by Japanese family firms: Empirical analysis using multidimensional innovation measures. Pacific-Basin Finance Journal, 57, 101030. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pacfin.2018.05.012.
• Lakens D Hilgard J Staaks J (2016). On the reproducibility of meta-analyses: Six practical recommendations. BMC psychology, 4, 24. https://doi.org/10.1186/s40359-016-0126-3.
• Le H. Oh I.-S. Shaffer J. Schmidt F. (2007). Implications of methodological advances for the practice of personnel selection: How practitioners benefit from meta-analysis. Academy of Management Perspectives, 21(3), 6–15. https://doi.org/10.5465/amp.2007.26421233
• Lipsey M. W. Wilson D. B (2001). Practical meta-analysis. SAGE.
• Loignon A. C. Woehr D. J. (2018). Social class in the organizational sciences: A conceptual integration and meta-analytic review. Journal of Management, 44(1), 61–88. https://doi.org/10.1177/0149206317728106
• López-Cózar-Navarro C. Priede-Bergamini T. Benito-Hernández S. (2020). The role of family character in cooperation agreements. Revista Brasileira de Gestão de Negócios, 22, 2, 290–309. https://doi.org/10.7819/rbgn.v22i2.4047
• Lorenzo D. Núñez-Cacho P. Akhter N. Chirico F. (2022). Why are some family firms not innovative? Innovation barriers and path dependence in family firms. Scandinavian Journal of Management, 38(1), 101182. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scaman.2021.101182
• Luo X. R. Jeong Y.-C. Chung C.-N. (2019). In the eye of the beholder: Global analysts’ coverage of family firms in an emerging market. Journal of Management, 45(5), 1830–1857. https://doi.org/10.1177/0149206317734899
• Lynskey M. J. (2004). Determinants of innovative activity in Japanese technology-based start-up firms. International Small Business Journal, 22(2), 159–196. https://doi.org/10.1177/0266242604041312
• Manzaneque M. Ramírez Y. Diéguez-Soto J. (2017). Intellectual capital efficiency, technological innovation and family management. Innovation Organization & Management, 19(2), 167–188. https://doi.org/10.1080/14479338.2016.1272828
• Martínez-Alonso R. Martínez-Romero M. J. Rojo-Ramírez A. A. (2020). The impact of technological innovation efficiency on firm growth: The moderating role of family involvement in management. European Journal of Innovation Management, 23(1), 134-155. https://doi.org/10.1108/EJIM-09-2018-0210.
• Matzler K. Veider V. Hautz J. Stadler C. (2015). The impact of family ownership, management, and governance on innovation. Journal of Product Innovation Management, 32(3), 319–333. https://doi.org/10.1111/jpim.12202
• Maxwell S. E. Lau M. Y. Howard G. S. (2015). Is psychology suffering from a replication crisis? What does “failure to replicate” really mean? American Psychologist, 70(6), 487, 98. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0039400
• McNeish D. Stapleton L. M. Silverman R. D. (2017). On the unnecessary ubiquity of hierarchical linear modeling. Psychological Methods, 22(1), 114–140. https://doi.org/10.1037/met0000078
• Miller D. Le Breton-Miller I. (2021) Family firms: a breed of extremes? Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, 45(4), 663–681. https://doi.org/10.1177/1042258720964186
• Miller D. Wright M. Breton-Miller I. L. Scholes L. (2015). Resources and innovation in family businesses: The Janus-face of socioemotional preferences. California Management Review, 58(1), 20–40. https://doi.org/10.1525/cmr.2015.58.1.20
• Miller K. D. Folta T. B. (2002) Option value and entry timing. Strategic Management Journal, 23(7): 655–665. https://doi.org/10.1002/smj.244
• Munari F. Oriani R. Sobrero M. (2010). The effects of owner identity and external governance systems on R&D investments: A study of Western European firms. Research Policy, 39(8), 1093–1104. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.respol.2010.05.004
• Muñoz-Bullón F. Sanchez-Bueno M. J. (2011) The impact of family involvement on the R&D intensity of publicly traded firms. Family Business Review, 24(1), 62–70. https://doi.org/10.1177/0894486510396870
• Obeng B. A. Robson P. Haugh H. (2014). Strategic entrepreneurship and small firm growth in Ghana. International Small Business Journal, 32(5), 501–524. https://doi.org/10.1177/0266242612463946
• Ortega-Argilés R. Moreno R. Caralt J. S. (2005). Ownership structure and innovation: Is there a real link? The Annals of Regional Science, 39(4), 637–662. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00168-005-0026-6
• Patel P. C. Chrisman J. J. (2014). Risk abatement as a strategy for R&D investments in family firms. Strategic Management Journal, 35(4), 617–627. https://doi.org/10.1002/smj.2119
• Paterson T. A. Harms P. D. Steel P. Credé M. (2016). An assessment of the magnitude of effect sizes: Evidence from 30 years of meta-analysis in management. Journal of Leadership & Organizational Studies, 23(1), 66-81. https://doi.org/10.1177/1548051815614321.
• Patsopoulos N. A. Analatos A. A. Ioannidis J. P. (2005). Relative citation impact of various study designs in the health sciences. JAMA, 293(19), 2362–2366. https://doi.org/10.1001/jama.293.19.2362
• Polanin J. R. Hennessy E. A. Tsuji S. (2020). Transparency and reproducibility of meta-analyses in psychology: A meta-review. Perspectives on Psychological Science, 15(4), 1026–1041. https://doi.org/10.1177/1745691620906416
• Pucci T. Brumana M. Minola T. Zanni L. (2020). Social capital and innovation in a life science cluster: The role of proximity and family involvement. The Journal of Technology Transfer, 45(1), 205–227. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10961-017-9591-y
• Röd I. (2016). Disentangling the family firm’s innovation process: A systematic review. Journal of Family Business Strategy, 7(3), 185–201. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jfbs.2016.08.004
• Rondi E. De Massis A. Kotlar J. (2019). Unlocking innovation potential: A typology of family business innovation postures and the critical role of the family system. Journal of Family Business Strategy, 10(4), 100236. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jfbs.2017.12.001
• Rosseel Y. (2012). Lavaan: An R package for structural equation modeling. Journal of Statistical Software, 48(2), 1–36. https://doi.org/10.18637/jss.v048.i02
• Schmid T. Achleitner A.-K. Ampenberger M. Kaserer C. (2014). Family firms and R&D behavior–New evidence from a large-scale survey. Research Policy, 43(1), 233–244. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.respol.2013.08.006
• Shojania KG Sampson M Ansari MT Ji J Doucette S Moher D. (2007). How quickly do systematic reviews go out of date? A survival analysis. Annals of Internal Medicine, 147(4), 224-233. https://doi.org/10.7326/0003-4819-147-4-200708210-00179.
• Sirmon D. G. Arregle J. L. Hitt M. A. Webb J. W. (2008). The role of family influence in firms’ strategic responses to threat of imitation. Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, 32(6), 979–998. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-6520.2008.00267.x
• Sirmon D. G. Hitt M. A. 2003. Managing resources: Linking unique resources, management, and wealth creation in family firms. Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, 27(4), 339–358. https://doi.org/10.1111/1540-8520.t01-1-00013
• Soluk J. Miroshnychenko I. Kammerlander N. De Massis A. (2021). Family influence and digital business model innovation: the enabling role of dynamic capabilities. Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, 45(4), 867–905. https://doi.org/10.1177/1042258721998946
• Sørensen J. B. Stuart T. E. (2000). Aging, obsolescence, and organizational innovation. Administrative Science Quarterly, 45(1), 81–112. https://doi.org/10.2307/2666980
• Schwab A. (2015). Why all researchers should report effect sizes and their confidence intervals: Paving the way for meta–analysis and evidence–based management practices. Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, 39(4), 719–725. https://doi.org/10.1111/etap.12158
• Stanley T. D. Doucouliagos H. (2012). Meta-regression analysis in economics and business. London, New York: Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203111710.
• Steel P. Beugelsdijk S. Aguinis H. (2021). The anatomy of an award-winning meta-analysis: Recommendations for authors, reviewers, and readers of meta-analytic reviews. Journal of International Business Studies, 52(1), 23–44. https://doi.org/10.1057/s41267-020-00385-z
• Tsao S.-M. Lien W.-H. (2013). Family management and internationalization: The impact on firm performance and innovation. Management International Review, 53(2), 189–213. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11575-011-0125-9
• Van den Noortgate W López-López JA Marín-Martínez F Sánchez-Meca J. (2013). Three-level meta-analysis of dependent effect sizes. Behavior Research Methods, 45(2), 576–94. https://doi.org/10.3758/s13428-012-0261-6
• Van Witteloostuijn A. Dejardin M. Pollack J. M. (2021). Replication in entrepreneurship. Journal of Business Venturing Insights, 16, e00271. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbvi.2021.e00271.
• Viechtbauer W. (2010). Conducting meta-analyses in R with the metafor package. Journal of Statistical Software, 36(3), 1–48. https://doi.org/10.18637/jss.v036.i03
• Viswesvaran C. Ones D. S. (1995). Theory testing: Combining psychometric meta-analysis and structural equations modeling. Personnel Psychology, 48(4), 865–885. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1744-6570.1995.tb01784.x
• Wagner D. Block J. H. Miller D. Schwens C. Xi G. (2015). A meta-analysis of the financial performance of family firms: Another attempt. Journal of Family Business Strategy, 6(1), 3–13. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jfbs.2015.01.001
• Werner A. Schröder C. Chlosta S. (2018). Driving factors of innovation in family and non-family SMEs. Small Business Economics, 50(1), 201–218. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11187-017-9884-4
• Wilson N. Wright M. Scholes L. (2013). Family business survival and the role of boards. Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, 37(6), 1369–1389. https://doi.org/10.1111/etap.12071
• Wilson S. J. Polanin J. R. Lipsey M. W. (2016). Fitting meta-analytic structural equation models with complex datasets. Research Synthesis Methods, 7(2), 121-139. https://doi.org/10.1002/jrsm.1199.
• Wu H.-L. (2008). When does internal governance make firms innovative? Journal of Business Research, 61(2), 141–153. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusres.2007.06.010
• Wu S. Levitas E. Priem R. L. (2005). CEO tenure and company invention under differing levels of technological dynamism. Academy of Management Journal, 48(5), 859–873. https://doi.org/10.5465/amj.2005.18803927
• Yang J. Ma J. Zhao H. Cater J. Arnold M. (2019). Family involvement, environmental turbulence, and R&D investment: evidence from Listed Chinese SMEs. Small Business Economics, 53(4), 1017–1032. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11187-018-0113-6
• Yoo T. (2017). The performance dimension in symbolic management revisited: the functional role of traditional mechanisms in large Korean firms. Asia Pacific Business Review, 23(1), 116–134. https://doi.org/10.1080/13602381.2015.1120418