Immunity Defences and the Enforcement of Awards in Investor-State Disputes

Reference : Immunity Defences and the Enforcement of Awards in Investor-State Disputes


	Document type :	Parts of books : Contribution to collective works
	Discipline(s) :	Law, criminology & political science : European & international law
	To cite this reference:	http://hdl.handle.net/10993/52200

Title :	Immunity Defences and the Enforcement of Awards in Investor-State Disputes
Language :	English
Author, co-author :	Garcia Olmedo, Javier [University of Luxembourg > Faculty of Law, Economics and Finance (FDEF) > Department of Law (DL) >]
Publication date :	14-Dec-2022
Main document title :	Investment Law & Arbitration in Central Asia: Emerging Issues
Author, co-author :	Nasir Gore, Kiran
	Duggal, Kabir
	Putilin, Elijah
	Baltag, Crina
Publisher :	Kluwer International
Peer reviewed :	Yes
Abstract :	[en] This chapter critically examines the claim that investment treaty awards have a final and binding character. It finds that, despite providing different mechanisms of collection, the ICSID and New York Conventions provide states with a tool to avoid compliance with investment treaty awards based on sovereign immunity rules. These rules have been invoked by states in an increasing number of cases, creating a hurdle for investors to obtain payment of the award. This chapter concludes with some potential remedies to the immunity bar.
Permalink :	http://hdl.handle.net/10993/52200
Other URL :	https://law-store.wolterskluwer.com/s/product/international-investment-law-and-arbitration-in-central-asia/01t4R00000P3c2dQAB

File(s) associated to this reference

Fulltext file(s):

	File	Commentary	Version	Size	Access
Open access	Ch.12_Javier García Olmedo.pdf		Publisher postprint	276.65 kB	View/Open

All documents in ORBi^lu are protected by a user license.