Refugee status determination; Asylum appeals; Common European Asylum System; Legal geographies; Commonality
Résumé :
[en] The Common European Asylum System aims to establish common standards for refugee status determination among EU Member States. Combining insights from legal and political geography we bring the depth and scale of this challenge into sharp relief. Drawing on interviews and a detailed ethnography of asylum adjudication involving over 850 in-person asylum appeal observations, we point towards practical differences in the spatio-temporality, materiality and logistics of asylum appeal processes as they are operationalised in seven European countries. Our analysis achieves three things. Firstly, we identify a key zone of differences at the level of concrete, everyday implementation that has largely escaped academic attention, which allows us to critically assess the notion of harmonisation of asylum policies in new ways. Secondly, drawing on legal- and political-geographical concepts, we offer a way to conceptualise this zone by paying attention to the spatio-temporality, materiality and logistics it involves. Thirdly, we offer critical legal logistics as a new direction for scholarship in legal geography and beyond that promises to prise open the previously obscured mechanics of contemporary legal systems.
VIANELLI, Lorenzo ; University of Luxembourg > Faculty of Humanities, Education and Social Sciences (FHSE) > Department of Geography and Spatial Planning (DGEO)
Co-auteurs externes :
yes
Langue du document :
Anglais
Titre :
Rethinking commonality in refugee status determination in Europe: Legal geographies of asylum appeals
Date de publication/diffusion :
octobre 2022
Titre du périodique :
Political Geography
ISSN :
0962-6298
eISSN :
1873-5096
Maison d'édition :
Elsevier, Royaume-Uni
Titre particulier du numéro :
The grey area of government: Ambiguity, inconsistency and opacity in the management of forced migration and borders
Volume/Tome :
98
Peer reviewed :
Peer reviewed vérifié par ORBi
Focus Area :
Migration and Inclusive Societies Law / European Law
H2020 - 677917 - ASYFAIR - Fair and Consistent Border Controls? A Critical, Multi-methodological and Interdisciplinary Study of Asylum Adjudication in Europe
Organisme subsidiant :
European Research Council - grant number StG-2015_677917 Economic and Social Research Council - grant number ES/J023426/1 CE - Commission Européenne
Anleu, S.R., Mack, K., Performing judicial authority in the lower courts. 2017, Palgrave, London.
Avdan, N., Do asylum recognition rates in Europe respond to transnational terrorism? The migration-security nexus revisited. European Union Politics 15:4 (2014), 445–471, 10.1177/1465116514534908.
Bartel, R., Carter, J., (eds.) Handbook on space, place and law, 2021, Edward Elgar Publishing, Cheltenham.
Bartel, R., Graham, N., Jackson, S., Prior, J.H., Robinson, D.F., Sherval, M., et al. Legal geography: An Australian perspective. Geographical Research 51:4 (2013), 339–353, 10.1111/1745-5871.12035.
Beirens, H., Cracked foundation, uncertain future: Structural weakness in the common European asylum system. 2018, Migration Policy Institute, Brussels.
Bergman Blix, S., Wettergren, Å., Professional emotions in court: A sociological perspective. 2018, Routledge, Abingdon.
Blomley, N., Law, space, and the geographies of power. 1994, Guilford Press, New York.
Braverman, I., Hidden in plain view: Legal geography from a visual perspective. Law, Culture and the Humanities 7:2 (2011), 173–186, 10.1177/1743872109355579.
Braverman, I., Blomley, N., Delaney, D., Kedar, A., (eds.) The expanding spaces of law: A timely legal geography, 2014, Stanford University Press, Stanford.
Byrne, R., Noll, G., Vedsted-Hansen, J., Understanding the crisis of refugee law: Legal scholarship and the EU asylum system. Leiden Journal of International Law 33:4 (2020), 871–892, 10.1017/S0922156520000382.
Campbell, J.R., Bureaucracy, law and dystopia in the United Kingdom's asylum system. 2016, Routledge, London.
Chetail, V., The common European asylum system: Bric-a-brac or system?. Chetail, V., De Bruycker, P., Maiani, F., (eds.) Reforming the common European asylum system: The new European refugee law, 2016, Brill, Leuven, 3–38.
Chua, C., Danyluk, M., Cowen, D., Khalili, L., Introduction: Turbulent circulation: Building a critical engagement with logistics. Environment and Planning D: Society and Space 36:4 (2018), 617–629, 10.1177/0263775818783101.
Costello, C., Hancox, E., The Recast Asylum Procedures Directive 2013/32/EU: Caught between the stereotypes of the abusive asylum seeker and the vulnerable refugee. Chetail, V., De Bruycker, P., Maiani, F., (eds.) Reforming the common European asylum system: The new European refugee law, 2016, Brill, Leuven, 377–445.
Cowen, D., The deadly life of logistics: Mapping violence in global trade. 2014, University of Minnesota Press, Minneapolis.
Dahlberg, L., Emotional tropes in the courtroom: On representation of affect and emotion in legal court proceedings. Law and Humanities 3:2 (2009), 175–205, 10.1080/17521483.2009.11423767.
Dahlvik, J., Asylum as construction work: Theorizing administrative practices. Migration Studies 5:3 (2017), 369–388, 10.1093/migration/mnx043.
Darian-Smith, E., Ethnography and law. 2017, Routledge, Abingdon.
Davies, M., Law unlimited: Materialism, pluralism and legal theory. 2017, Routledge, London.
Delaney, D., The spatial, the legal and the pragmatics of world-making: Nomospheric investigations. 2010, Routledge-Cavendish, London.
Delaney, D., Legal geography I: Constitutivities, complexities, and contingencies. Progress in Human Geography 39:1 (2015), 96–102, 10.1177/0309132514527035.
Directorate-General for Internal Policies. The implementation of the common European asylum policy, 2016, The European Parliament, Brussels Retreived from https://www.europarl.europa.eu/thinktank/en/document.html?reference=IPOL_STU%282016%29556953.
Ehrkamp, P., Geographies of migration I: Refugees. Progress in Human Geography 41:6 (2017), 813–822, 10.1177/0309132516663061.
Eule, T.G., Borrelli, L.M., Lindberg, A., Wyss, A., Migrants before the law: Contested migration control in Europe. 2019, Springer International Publishing, Cham.
Fassin, D., Kobelinsky, C., Comment on juge l'asile: L'institution comme agent. Revue Française de Sociologie 53:4 (2012), 657–688, 10.3917/rfs.534.0657.
Geddes, A., Hadj-Abdou, L., Brumat, L., Migration and mobility in the European union. 2nd ed., 2020, Red Globe Press, London.
Gest, J., Boucher, A., Challen, S., Burgoon, B., Thielemann, E., Beine, M., et al. Measuring and comparing immigration, asylum and naturalization policies across countries: Challenges and solutions. Global Policy 5:3 (2014), 261–274, 10.1111/1758-5899.12132.
Gill, N., Allsopp, J., Burridge, A., Fisher, D., Griffiths, M., Hambly, J., Rotter, R., What's missing from legal geography and materialist studies of law? Absence and the assembling of asylum appeal hearings in Europe. Transactions of the Institute of British Geographers 45:4 (2020), 937–951, 10.1111/tran.12399.
Gill, N., Allsopp, J., Burridge, A., Fisher, D., Griffiths, M., Paszkiewicz, N., Rotter, R., The tribunal atmosphere: On qualitative barriers to access to justice. Geoforum 119 (2021), 61–71, 10.1016/j.geoforum.2020.11.002.
Gill, N., Hynes, J., Courtwatching: Visibility, publicness, witnessing, and embodiment in legal activism. Area 53:4 (2021), 569–576, 10.1111/area.12690.
Gill, N., Rotter, R., Burridge, A., Allsopp, J., The limits of procedural discretion: Unequal treatment and vulnerability in Britain's asylum appeals. Social & Legal Studies 27:1 (2018), 49–78, 10.1177/0964663917703178.
Good, A., Anthropology and expertise in the asylum courts. 2007, Routledge-Cavendish, London.
Grappi, G., Europe and the contested politics of migration: Between logistification and global justice. GLOBUS Research Paper 7/2020, 2020 Retrieved from https://www.ssrn.com/abstract=3557952.
Häkli, J., Kallio, K.P., Bodies and persons: The politics of embodied encounters in asylum seeking. Progress in Human Geography 45:4 (2021), 682–703, 10.1177/0309132520938449.
Hambly, J., Gill, N., Law and speed: Asylum appeals and the techniques and consequences of legal quickening. Journal of law and society 47:1 (2020), 2–28, 10.1111/jols.12220.
Hamlin, R., Let me be a refugee: Administrative justice and the politics of asylum in the United States, Canada, and Australia. 2014, Oxford University Press, New York.
Hatton, T.J., Seeking asylum in Europe. Economic Policy 19:38 (2004), 6–62, 10.1111/j.1468-0327.2004.00118.x.
Hughes, R., Ordinary theatre and extraordinary law at the Khmer Rouge Tribunal. Environment and Planning D: Society and Space 33:4 (2015), 714–731, 10.1177/0263775815598081.
Hughes, R., Elander, M., Scales of justice: ‘International standards’ and ‘local ownership’ at a hybrid tribunal. Antipode 54:2 (2022), 462–481, 10.1111/anti.12789.
Hynes, J., Gill, N., Tomlinson, J., In defence of the hearing? Emerging geographies of publicness, materiality, access and communication in court hearings. Geography Compass, 14(9), 2020, e12499, 10.1111/gec3.12499.
International Association of Refugee Law Judges European Chapter. An introduction to the common European asylum system for courts and tribunals: A judicial analysis. 2016, European Asylum Support Office, Brussels.
Jeffrey, A., Legal geography 1: Court materiality. Progress in Human Geography 43:3 (2019), 565–573, 10.1177/0309132517747746.
Jeffrey, A., Legal geography II: Bodies and law. Progress in Human Geography 44:5 (2020), 1004–1016, 10.1177/0309132519888681.
Jeffrey, A., Legal geography III: Evidence. Progress in Human Geography 45:4 (2021), 902–913, 10.1177/0309132520973756.
Jones, R., Johnson, C., Placing the border in everyday life. 2016, Routledge, Abingdon.
Khalili, L., Sinews of war and trade: Shipping and capitalism in the Arabian Peninsula. 2021, Verso Books, London.
Lavenex, S., ‘Failing forward’ towards which Europe? Organized hypocrisy in the common European asylum system. Journal of Communication and Media Studies: Journal of Common Market Studies 56:5 (2018), 1195–1212, 10.1111/jcms.12739.
Lawrance, B.N., Ruffers, G., (eds.) Adjudicating refugee and asylum status: The role of witness, expertise, and testimony, 2015, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.
Lecavalier, J., The rule of logistics: Walmart and the architecture of fulfilment. 2016, University of Minnesota Press, Minneapolis.
Liodden, T.M., Making the right decision: Justice in the asylum bureaucracy in Norway. Gill, N., Good, A., (eds.) Asylum determination in Europe: Ethnographic perspectives, 2019, Springer Nature, Cham, Switzerland 2019.
Mitchell, K., Jones, R., Fluri, J.L., (eds.) Handbook on critical geographies of migration, 2019, Edward Elgar Publishing, Cheltenham.
Neilson, B., Five theses on understanding logistics as power. Distinktion: Journal of Social Theory 13:3 (2012), 322–339, 10.1080/1600910X.2012.728533.
Netten, N., van den Braak, S.W., Bargh, M.S., Choenni, S., Leeuw, F.L., Asylum recognition rates in Western Europe: Their determinants, variation, and lack of convergence. Journal of Conflict Resolution 49:1 (2018), 43–66, 10.1177/0022002704271057.
Neumayer, E., Bogus refugees? The determinants of asylum migration to Western Europe. International Studies Quarterly 49:3 (2005), 389–410, 10.1111/j.1468-2478.2005.00370.x.
Papada, E., Papoutsi, A., Painter, J., Vradis, A., Pop-up governance: Transforming the management of migrant populations through humanitarian and security practices in Lesbos, Greece, 2015–2017. Environment and Planning D: Society and Space 38:6 (2020), 1028–1045, 10.1177/0263775819891167.
Plümper, T., Neumayer, E., Human rights violations and the gender gap in asylum recognition rates. Journal of European Public Policy 28:11 (2021), 1807–1826, 10.1080/13501763.2020.1787488.
Pöllabauer, S., Interpreting in asylum hearings: Issues of role, responsibility and power. Interpreting 6:2 (2004), 143–180, 10.1075/intp.6.2.03pol.
Pollozek, S., Passoth, J.H., Infrastructuring European migration and border control: The logistics of registration and identification at Moria hotspot. Environment and Planning D: Society and Space 37:4 (2019), 606–624, 10.1177/0263775819835819.
Pörtner, E., Re-cording lives: Governing asylum in Switzerland and the need to resolve. 2021, transcript Verlag, Bielefeld.
Ramji-Nogales, J., Schoenholtz, A.I., Schrag, P.G., Refugee roulette: Disparities in asylum adjudication. Stanford Law Review 60:2 (2007), 295–412.
Sumption, J., Trials of the state: Law and the decline of politics. 2019, Profile Books, London.
Tazzioli, M., The temporal borders of asylum: Temporality of control in the EU border regime. Political Geography 64 (2018), 13–22, 10.1016/j.polgeo.2018.02.002.
Teitgen-Colly, C., The European Union and asylum: An illusion of protection. Common Market Law Review 43:6 (2006), 1503–1566.
Thielemann, E.R., Does policy matter? On governments' attempts to control unwanted migration., 2003, IIIS Discussion Paper, 10.2139/ssrn.495631 No. 9.
Tomkinson, S., Who are you afraid of and why? Inside the black box of refugee tribunals. Canadian Public Administration 61:2 (2018), 184–204, 10.1111/capa.12275.
Toshkov, D.D., The dynamic relationship between asylum applications and recognition rates in Europe (1987–2010). European Union Politics 15:2 (2014), 192–214, 10.1177/1465116513511710.
Trauner, F., Asylum policy: The EU's ‘crises’ and the looming policy regime failure. Journal of European Integration 38:3 (2016), 311–325, 10.1080/07036337.2016.1140756.
Tsourdi, L., Holding the European Asylum Support Office accountable for its role in asylum decision-making: Mission impossible?. German Law Journal 21:3 (2020), 506–531, 10.1017/glj.2020.21.
Valverde, M., Chronotopes of Law: Jurisdiction, Scale and Governance, 2015, Routledge, Abingdon.
Zhukov, Y.M., Roads and the diffusion of insurgent violence: The logistics of conflict in Russia's North Caucasus. Political Geography 31:3 (2012), 144–156, 10.1016/j.polgeo.2011.12.002.
