Common European Asylum System; Depoliticisation; Harmonisation; Implementation; Reception Conditions; Teleology; Utopia
Abstract :
[en] This article explores the temporal dimension of the Common European Asylum System (CEAS) by exposing its teleological character and the effects of the latter on the governance of asylum in the European Union. Drawing on EU policy documents, the article shows how the CEAS has been presented since its inception as a teleology, that is, a process that is inexorably unfolding towards a specific outcome to be reached in an indefinite time in the future. The outcome consists in the establishment of a common area of protection constituted by a level playing field in which asylum seekers and beneficiaries of international protection will be treated alike regardless of the place of residence. Such a teleological narrative informing the CEAS paves the way to overly optimistic expectations on the possibilities of implementation, which in turn result in an overestimation of the potential of harmonisation. By discussing the limitations of harmonisation in relation to the reception of asylum seekers, this article calls into question the possibility of a homogeneous area of protection where equivalent conditions are offered to all asylum seekers across the EU. Such a homogeneous space is utopian because harmonisation does not aim to eradicate differences but rather to mitigate them, thus tolerating diverse arrangements. The article, therefore, argues that the level playing field projected by the CEAS constitutes a promise that has two key effects: First, it depoliticises the CEAS itself by framing problems as technical issues, requiring technical solutions; second, it paves the way to further EU intervention in this field.
Disciplines :
Political science, public administration & international relations Sociology & social sciences
Author, co-author :
Vianelli, Lorenzo ; University of Luxembourg > Faculty of Humanities, Education and Social Sciences (FHSE) > Department of Geography and Spatial Planning (DGEO)
External co-authors :
no
Language :
English
Title :
The Never‐Ending Road Towards the CEAS: Utopia, Teleology, and Depoliticisation in EU Asylum Policies
Publication date :
2022
Journal title :
Social Inclusion
ISSN :
2183-2803
Publisher :
Cogitatio, Portugal
Special issue title :
A Common European Asylum System: Utopian or Dystopian Expectations?
H2020 - 838722 - CONDISOBS - Contain, Distribute, Obstruct. Governing the Mobility of Asylum Seekers in the European Union
Name of the research project :
Contain, Distribute, Obstruct. Governing the Mobility of Asylum Seekers in the European Union (CONDISOBS)
Funders :
European Union’s Horizon 2020 research and innovation programme under the Marie Skłodowska-Curie grant agreement No 838722 CE - Commission Européenne [BE]
Abram, S., & Weszkalnys, G. (2011). Introduction: Anthro-pologies of planning—Temporality, imagination, and ethnography. Focaal—Journal of Global and Histori-cal Anthropology, 61, 3–18.
AIDA. (2018). Access to protection in Europe: The reg-istration of asylum applications. https://asylumin europe.org/wp-content/uploads/2020/11/aida_ accessii_registration.pdf
AIDA. (2019). Housing out of reach? The reception of refugees and asylum seekers in Europe. https://asylumineurope.org/wp-content/uploads/2020/11/aida_housing_out_of_reach.pdf
Barry, A. (1993). The European community and European government: Harmonization, mobility and space. Economy and Society, 22(3), 314–326.
Barry, A. (1994). Harmonization and the art of European government. In C. Rootes & H. Devis (Eds.), Social change and political transformation (pp. 39–54). UCL Press.
Barry, A. (2001). Political machines: Governing a techno-logical society. Athlone.
Bauböck, R. (2018). Refugee protection and burden-sharing in the European Union. Journal of Common Market Studies, 56, 141–156.
Baumgartner, P., & Wagner, M. (2018). Sharing respon-sibilities in the Common European Asylum System (CEASEVAL Research on the Common European Asylum System No. 4). CEASEVAL. http://ceaseval. eu/publications/04_BaumgartnerWagner_ SharingResponsibilties.pdf
Beirens, H. (2018). Cracked foundations, uncertain future: Structural weaknesses in the Common European Asylum System. Migration Policy Institute Europe. https://www.migrationpolicy.org/sites/default/files/publications/CEAS-Structural Weaknesses_Final.pdf
Caponio, T., Ponzo, I., & Giannetto, L. (2019). Comparative report on the multilevel governance of the national asylum seekers’ reception systems (CEASEVAL Research on the Common European Asylum System No. 24). CEASEVAL. http://ceaseval. eu/publications/24_WP3_Comparative Report.pdf
Chamlian, L. (2016). The colonisation of the future: Power, knowledge and preparedness in CSDP. Global Society, 30(3), 391–411.
Chetail, V. (2016). The Common European Asylum Sys-tem: Bric-à-brac or system? In V. Chetail, P. De Bruy-cker, & F. Maiani (Eds.), Reforming the Common European Asylum System: The new European refugee law (pp. 3–38). Brill Nijhoff.
Chetail, V., De Bruycker, P., & Maiani, F. (Eds.). (2016). Reforming the Common European Asylum System: The new European refugee law. Brill Nijhoff.
Commission of the European Communities. (2008). Communication from the Commission to the European Parliament, the Council, the European Economic and Social Committee and the Committee of Regions. Policy plan on asylum: An integrated approach to protection across the EU. https://eur-lex.europa. eu/LexUriServ/LexUriServ.do?uri=COM:2008:0360: FIN:EN:PDF
Den Heijer, M., Rijpma, J., & Spijkerboer, T. (2016). Coer-cion, prohibition, and great expectations: The contin-uing failure of the Common European Asylum System. Common Market Law Review, 53, 607–642.
EASO. (2013). EASO annual activity report 2012—Part I. https://www.easo.europa.eu/sites/default/files/public/EASO-Annual-Activity-Report-Part-1.pdf
European Commission. (2014a). A Common European Asylum System. http://ec.europa.eu/dgs/home-affairs/e-library/docs/ceas-factsheets/ceas_ factsheet_en.pdf
European Commission. (2014b). Communication from the Commission to the European Parliament, the Council, the European Economic and Social Committee and the Committee of the Regions. An open and secure Europe: Making it happen. https://ec.europa. eu/home-affairs/sites/homeaffairs/files/elibrary/documents/basic-documents/docs/an_open_and_ secure_europe_-_making_it_happen_en.pdf
European Commission. (2015a). Communication from the Commission to the European Parliament, the Council, the European Economic and Social Committee and the Committee of the Regions. A European agenda on migration. https://ec.europa.eu/home-affairs/system/files/2020-09/communication_on_ the_european_agenda_on_migration_en.pdf
European Commission. (2015b). Explanatory note on the hotspot approach. https://www.statewatch.org/media/documents/news/2015/jul/eu-com-hotsposts.pdf
European Commission. (2016). Communication from the Commission to the European Parliament and the Council. Towards a reform of the Common Euro- pean Asylum System and enhancing legal avenues to Europe. https://eur-lex.europa.eu/legal-content/ EN/TXT/PDF/?uri=CELEX:52016DC0197
European Commission. (2020). Communication from the Commission to the European Parliament, the Council, the European Economic and Social Committee and the Committee of the Regions on a new pact on migration and asylum. https://eur-lex.europa.eu/resource.html?uri=cellar:85ff8b4f-ff13-11ea-b44f- 01aa75ed71a1.0002.02/DOC_3&format=PDF
European Commission. (2021, June 29). New pact on migration and asylum: Agreement reached on the new European Union Agency for Asylum [Press Release]. https://ec.europa.eu/commission/presscorner/detail/en/IP_21_3241
European Council. (1999). Presidency conclusions of the Tampere European Council. http://www.europarl. europa.eu/summits/tam_en.htm
European Council. (2014). European Council 26/27 June 2014. Conclusions. https://www.consilium. europa.eu/uedocs/cms_Data/docs/pressdata/en/ec/143478.pdf
Ferguson, J. (1994). The anti-politics machine: “Devel-opment,” depoliticization, and bureaucratic power in Lesotho. University of Minnesota Press.
Fratzke, S. (2015). Not adding up: The fading promises of Europe’s Dublin system. Migration Policy Institute Europe. https://www.migrationpolicy.org/sites/default/files/publications/MPIe-Asylum- DublinReg.pdf
Gill, N., Allsopp, J., Burridge, A., Fisher, D., Griffiths, M., Hambly, J., Hoellerer, N., Paszkiewicz, N., & Rotter, R. (2020). What’s missing from legal geography and materialist studies of law? Absence and the assem-bling of asylum appeal hearings in Europe. Trans-actions of the Institute of British Geographers, 45, 937–951.
Gill, N., & Good, A. (Eds.). (2018a). Asylum determination in Europe. Ethnographic perspectives. Palgrave Macmillan. https://link.springer.com/content/pdf/10.1007%2F978-3-319-94749-5.pdf
Gill, N., & Good, A. (2018b). Introduction. In N. Gill & A. Good (Eds.), Asylum determination in Europe. Ethnographic perspectives (pp. 1–26). Palgrave Macmillan. https://link.springer.com/content/pdf/10.1007%2F978-3-319-94749-5.pdf
Glorius, B., & Doomernik, J. (Eds.). (2020). Geographies of asylum in Europe and the role of European localities. Springer. https://link.springer.com/content/pdf/10.1007%2F978-3-030-25666-1.pdf
Gomes, V., & Doomernik, J. (2019a). Report contain-ing the detailed models for a sustainable CEAS (CEASEVAL Research on the Common European Asylum System No. 40). CEASEVAL. https://ec.europa. eu/research/participants/documents/download Public?documentIds=080166e5c7d71d7b&appId= PPGMS
Gomes, V., & Doomernik, J. (2019b). Report on a vari- ety of ideal-typical common European asylum sys-tems (CEASEVAL Research on the Common European Asylum System No. 38). CEASEVAL. https://ec. europa.eu/research/participants/documents/ downloadPublic?documentIds=080166e5c4876 c30&appId=PPGMS
Kaunert, C., & Léonard, S. (2012). The European Union asylum policy after the Treaty of Lisbon and the Stockholm Programme: Towards supranational governance in a common area of protection? Refugee Survey Quarterly, 31(4), 1–20.
Li, T. M. (2007). Will to improve: Governmentality, devel-opment, and the practice of politics. Duke University Press.
Maiani, F. (2017). The reform of the Dublin system and the dystopia of “sharing people.” Maastricht Journal of European and Comparative Law, 24(5), 622–645.
Niemann, A., & Schmitter, P. C. (2009). Neofunctionalism. In A. Wiener & T. Diez (Eds.), European integration theory (pp. 45–66). Oxford University Press.
Schweitzer, R., Consterdine, E., & Collyer, M. (2018). A review and analysis of the recent literature on the Common European Asylum System (CEASEVAL Research on the Common European Asylum System No. 03). CEASEVAL. http://ceaseval.eu/publications/03_Schweitzer_et_al_review_and_analysis_of_the_ recent_%2520literature.pdf
Scipioni, M. (2018). De novo bodies and EU integration: What is the story behind EU agencies’ expansion. Journal of Common Market Studies, 56(4), 768–784.
Thielemann, E. (2018). Why refugee burden-sharing ini-tiatives fail: Public goods, free-riding and symbolic solidarity in the EU. Journal of Common Market Stud-ies, 56(1), 63–82.
Thym, D., & Tsourdi, E. L. (2017). Searching for solidarity in the EU asylum and border policies: Constitutional and operational dimensions. Maastricht Journal of European and Comparative Law, 24(5), 605–621.
Tranholm-Mikkelsen, J. (1991). Neo-functionalism: Obsti-nate or obsolete? A reappraisal in the light of the new dynamism of the EU. Millennium: Journal of International Studies, 20(1), 1–22.
Tsourdi, E. L. (2017). Solidarity at work? The prevalence of emergency-driven solidarity in the administrative governance of the Common European Asylum Sys-tem. Maastricht Journal of European and Comparative Law, 24(5), 667–686.
UNHCR. (2017). Italy sea arrivals dashboard. January– December 2016. https://data2.unhcr.org/en/documents/download/53356
UNHCR. (2018). Greece sea arrivals dashboard. December 2017. https://data2.unhcr.org/en/documents/download/61492
UNHCR. (2022a). Greece sea arrivals dashboard. December 2021. https://reliefweb.int/sites/reliefweb.int/files/resources/GRC_SeaArrivals_Dashboard Monthly_2021231.pdf
Velluti, S. (2014). Reforming the Common European Asylum System: Legislative developments and judicial activism of the European Courts. Springer.
Vianelli, L. (2017). EUrope’s uneven geographies of recep-tion. Excess, differentiation, and struggles in the government of asylum seekers. Etnografia e Ricerca Qualitativa, 3, 363–392.
Vianelli, L., Oesch, L., & Nienaber, B. (2019). National report on the governance of the asylum reception system in Luxembourg (CEASEVAL Research on the Common European Asylum System No. 22). CEASE- VAL. http://ceaseval.eu/publications/WP3_ Luxembourg.pdf
Walker, R. B. J. (2000). Europe is not where it is supposed to be. In M. Kelstrup & M. C. Williams (Eds.), International relations theory and the politics of European integration (pp. 14–32). Routledge.
Walters, W. (2004). The political rationality of European integration. In W. Larner & W. Walters (Eds.), Global governmentality: Governing international spaces (pp. 155–173). Routledge.
Walters, W., & Haahr, J. H. (2005). Governing Europe: Dis-course, governmentality and European integration. Routledge.
