Reference : A Systematic Literature Review of Empirical Methods and Risk Representation in Usable...
Scientific journals : Article
Social & behavioral sciences, psychology : Multidisciplinary, general & others
http://hdl.handle.net/10993/49488
A Systematic Literature Review of Empirical Methods and Risk Representation in Usable Privacy and Security Research
English
Distler, Verena mailto [University of Luxembourg > Faculty of Humanities, Education and Social Sciences (FHSE) > Department of Behavioural and Cognitive Sciences (DBCS) >]
Fassl, Matthias [CISPA Helmholtz Center for Information Security]
Habib, Hana [Carnegie Mellon University]
Krombholz, Katharina [CISPA Helmholtz Center for Information Security]
Lenzini, Gabriele mailto [University of Luxembourg > Interdisciplinary Centre for Security, Reliability and Trust (SNT) > IRiSC >]
Lallemand, Carine mailto [University of Luxembourg > Faculty of Humanities, Education and Social Sciences (FHSE) > Department of Behavioural and Cognitive Sciences (DBCS) >]
Cranor, Lorrie Faith [Carnegie Mellon University]
Koenig, Vincent mailto [University of Luxembourg > Faculty of Humanities, Education and Social Sciences (FHSE) > Department of Behavioural and Cognitive Sciences (DBCS) >]
Dec-2021
ACM Transactions on Computer-Human Interaction
Association for Computing Machinery (ACM)
28
6
50
Yes (verified by ORBilu)
International
1073-0516
1557-7325
New-York
NY
[en] Human-Computer Interaction (HCI) ; user experience ; Usable privacy and security
[en] Usable privacy and security researchers have developed a variety of approaches to represent risk to research participants. To understand how these approaches are used and when each might be most appropriate, we conducted a systematic literature review of methods used in security and privacy studies with human participants. From a sample of 633 papers published at five top conferences between 2014 and 2018 that included keywords related to both security/privacy and usability, we systematically selected and analyzed 284 full-length papers that included human subjects studies. Our analysis focused on study methods; risk representation; the use of prototypes, scenarios, and educational intervention; the use of deception to simulate risk; and types of participants. We discuss benefits and shortcomings of the methods, and identify key methodological, ethical, and research challenges when representing and assessing security and privacy risk. We also provide guidelines for the reporting of user studies in security and privacy.
Fonds National de la Recherche - FnR
Researchers ; Professionals ; Students
http://hdl.handle.net/10993/49488
10.1145/3469845
FnR ; FNR10621687 > Sjouke Mauw > SPsquared > Security And Privacy For System Protection > 01/01/2017 > 30/06/2023 > 2015

File(s) associated to this reference

Fulltext file(s):

FileCommentaryVersionSizeAccess
Open access
Distler_Systematic_Literature_Review_Empirical_Methods_Risk_Representation_Usable_Privacy_Security.pdfPublisher postprint977.95 kBView/Open

Additional material(s):

File Commentary Size Access
Open access
Included_Papers.pdfIncluded Papers163.72 kBView/Open
Open access
UPS_Reporting_Guidelines_Word.docxReporting Guidelines18.28 kBView/Open

Bookmark and Share SFX Query

All documents in ORBilu are protected by a user license.