Article (Périodiques scientifiques)
Intersectional Inequalities in Science
KOZLOWSKI, Diego; Larivière, Vincent; Sugimoto, Cassidy R. et al.
2022In Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 119 (2), p. 2113067119
Peer reviewed vérifié par ORBi
 

Documents


Texte intégral
e2113067119.full.pdf
Postprint Éditeur (1.6 MB)
Télécharger

Tous les documents dans ORBilu sont protégés par une licence d'utilisation.

Envoyer vers



Détails



Mots-clés :
intersectionality; science of science; bibliometrics
Résumé :
[en] The US scientific workforce is primarily composed of White men. Studies have demonstrated the systemic barriers preventing women and other minoritized populations from gaining entry to science; few, however, have taken an intersectional perspective and examined the consequences of these inequalities on scientific knowledge. We provide a large-scale bibliometric analysis of the relationship between intersectional identities, topics, and scientific impact. We find homophily between identities and topic, suggesting a relationship between diversity in the scientific workforce and expansion of the knowledge base. However, topic selection comes at a cost to minoritized individuals for whom we observe both between- and within-topic citation disadvantages. To enhance the robustness of science, research organizations should provide adequate resources to historically underfunded research areas while simultaneously providing access for minoritized individuals into high-prestige networks and topics.
Disciplines :
Bibliothéconomie & sciences de l’information
Auteur, co-auteur :
KOZLOWSKI, Diego ;  University of Luxembourg > Faculty of Science, Technology and Medicine (FSTM) > Department of Engineering (DoE)
Larivière, Vincent;  Université de Montréal - UdeM > EBSI
Sugimoto, Cassidy R.;  Georgia Institute of Technology > SPP
Monroe-White, Thema;  Berry College > Campbell School of Business
Co-auteurs externes :
yes
Langue du document :
Anglais
Titre :
Intersectional Inequalities in Science
Date de publication/diffusion :
11 janvier 2022
Titre du périodique :
Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America
ISSN :
0027-8424
eISSN :
1091-6490
Maison d'édition :
National Academy of Sciences, Washington DC, Etats-Unis - District de Columbia
Volume/Tome :
119
Fascicule/Saison :
2
Pagination :
e2113067119
Peer reviewed :
Peer reviewed vérifié par ORBi
Focus Area :
Computational Sciences
Projet FnR :
FNR12252781 - Data-driven Computational Modelling And Applications, 2017 (01/09/2018-28/02/2025) - Andreas Zilian
Organisme subsidiant :
FNR - Fonds National de la Recherche
Commentaire :
Significance The US scientific workforce is not representative of the population. Barriers to entry and participation have been well-studied; however, few have examined the effect of these disparities on the advancement of science. Furthermore, most studies have looked at either race or gender, failing to account for the intersection of these variables. Our analysis utilizes millions of scientific papers to study the relationship between scientists and the science they produce. We find a strong relationship between the characteristics of scientists and their research topics, suggesting that diversity changes the scientific portfolio with consequences for career advancement for minoritized individuals. Science policies should consider this relationship to increase equitable participation in the scientific workforce and thereby improve the robustness of science.
Disponible sur ORBilu :
depuis le 07 janvier 2022

Statistiques


Nombre de vues
226 (dont 10 Unilu)
Nombre de téléchargements
277 (dont 3 Unilu)

citations Scopus®
 
222
citations Scopus®
sans auto-citations
213
OpenCitations
 
47
citations OpenAlex
 
277
citations WoS
 
202

Bibliographie


Publications similaires



Contacter ORBilu