Reference : Responsibility for Property and Assets Frozen or Seized by States Upon Request by the...
Scientific congresses, symposiums and conference proceedings : Unpublished conference
Law, criminology & political science : European & international law
Law / European Law
http://hdl.handle.net/10993/48316
Responsibility for Property and Assets Frozen or Seized by States Upon Request by the International Criminal Court
English
Owiso, Owiso mailto [University of Luxembourg > Faculty of Law, Economics and Finance (FDEF) > Department of Law (DL) >]
10-Jun-2021
No
International
VIII International Association of Penal Law (AIDP) Symposium for Young Penalists
10-06-2021 to 11-06-2021
Maastricht University
[en] Article 57(3)(e) of the Rome Statute of the International Criminal Court empowers the International Criminal Court to ‘seek the cooperation of States pursuant to article 93, paragraph 1 (k), to take protective measures for the purpose of forfeiture, in particular for the ultimate benefit of victims’ while Article 93(1)(k) imposes an obligation on state parties to the statute to provide assistance to the Court in the ‘identification, tracing and freezing or seizure of proceeds, property and assets and instrumentalities of crimes for the purpose of eventual forfeiture’. However, the Court does not yet have sufficient jurisprudence to flesh out the conceptual and practical boundaries of these provisions, including the question of responsibility for the management of the frozen or seized property and assets. If the Court’s very limited relevant jurisprudence is anything to go by, it is urgently necessary to interrogate these provisions and their practical application, as these questions lie at the very core of the Court’s integrity and credibility. This is especially so as the Court seeks to expand its practical reach beyond (mainly indigent) non-state actors to state actors, a situation that is likely to call more attention to the Court’s powers and responsibilities specifically relating to Articles 57(3)(e) and 93(1)(k). This article interrogates the Court’s powers under Article 57(3)(e) and the extent of obligations of the Court and state parties arising from Article 93(1)(k), and the possible implications for the rights of accused persons, the rights and expectations of victims and for state cooperation.
Researchers ; Professionals ; Students ; General public
http://hdl.handle.net/10993/48316

File(s) associated to this reference

Fulltext file(s):

FileCommentaryVersionSizeAccess
Open access
OWISO OWISO (31.08.2021).pdfAuthor preprint449.96 kBView/Open

Bookmark and Share SFX Query

All documents in ORBilu are protected by a user license.