Reference : Towards a computer-assisted aesthetics of user response
Scientific journals : Article
Arts & humanities : Languages & linguistics
Computational Sciences
http://hdl.handle.net/10993/47850
Towards a computer-assisted aesthetics of user response
English
Armaselu, Florentina mailto [University of Luxembourg > Luxembourg Centre for Contemporary and Digital History (C2DH) > Digital History and Historiography >]
18-Aug-2021
Digital Scholarship in the Humanities
Oxford University Press
Yes (verified by ORBilu)
International
2055-7671
2055-768X
Oxford
United Kingdom
[en] text analysis ; user response ; humanistic HCI
[en] The article focuses on the analysis of the user as an aesthetic category and proposes a methodology for evaluating user response within a framework that combines theoretical background from different areas, the theory of aesthetic response, psycholinguistics, appraisal theory, dialogism, and affective stylistics, with the application of digital tools for corpus linguistics and sentiment analysis. Four user types were derived from the corpus linguistics analysis referred to as immersed, distant, sceptical, and enthusiastic users. Each type may encompass a certain degree of intentionality and convey an attitude, implying features such as commitment and honesty, objectivity and engagement with the audience, critical reflection and circumspection, openness to technological novelty, and enjoyment. This assumes that the users involved in usability testing are not neutral or undifferentiated informational entities placed in an experimental context but individuals that respond to the same stimuli and express themselves differently in light of psycholinguistic factors and rules of social interaction. On the other hand, the results of sentiment analysis showed that an experiential analysis, centred not only on the artefact but also on the response and the experience it generates, may enable understanding the user as involved in a hermeneutic process of interpretation during his/her interaction with the studied artefact. Given the small scale of the analysed data, the study does not intend to provide evidence for general or definitive statements but formulates and illustrates a set of interpretative hypotheses and methodological directions for further enquiry aiming at developing an ‘aesthetics’ of user response.
Luxembourg Centre for Contemporary and Digital History (C2DH) > Digital History & Historiography (DHI)
University of Luxembourg - UL
Researchers ; Professionals ; Students
http://hdl.handle.net/10993/47850
10.1093/llc/fqab069
https://academic.oup.com/dsh/advance-article/doi/10.1093/llc/fqab069/6353938?guestAccessKey=abfaa9d2-11cd-40ec-ab28-ffd07caf6e8f
© The Author(s) 2021. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of EADH.
This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/), which permits non-commercial re-use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. For commercial re-use, please contact journals.permissions@oup.com

File(s) associated to this reference

Fulltext file(s):

FileCommentaryVersionSizeAccess
Limited access
FAR-OA_fqab069_article.pdfBoth the HTML and PDF versions of the article are available in Open Access on the publisher website.Publisher postprint662.31 kBRequest a copy

Bookmark and Share SFX Query

All documents in ORBilu are protected by a user license.