Houssemand, Claude ; University of Luxembourg > Faculty of Humanities, Education and Social Sciences (FHSE) > Department of Education and Social Work (DESW)
External co-authors :
yes
Language :
English
Title :
Scientific Creativity in Psychology: A Cognitive-Conative Approach
Publication date :
2021
Main work title :
Research Anthology on Rehabilitation Practices and Therapy
Publisher :
Information Resources Management Association (USA)
P21. (2010). 21st century knowledge and skills in educator preparation. Washington, DC: Author.
Amabile, T. (1982). Social psychology of creativity: A consensual assessment technique. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 43(5), 997-1013. doi:10.1037/0022-3514.43.5.997
Amabile, T. (1983). The social psychology of creativity: A componential conceptualization. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 45(2), 357-376. doi:10.1037/0022-3514.45.2.357
Amabile, T. (2012). Componential theory of creativity. Boston, MA: Harvard Business School.
Batey, M., & Furnham, A. (2006). Creativity, intelligence, and personality: A critical review of the scat-tered literature. Genetic, Social, and General Psychology Monographs, 132(4), 355-429. doi:10.3200/M0N0.132.4.355-430 PMID:18341234
Becker, P. (1995). Seelische Gesundheit und Verhaltenskontrolle: Eine integrative Personlichkeitstheorie und ihre klinische Anwendung [Mental health and behavioral control: An integrative personality theory and its clinical application]. Gottingen: Hogrefe-Verlag fur Psychologie.
Becker, P. (2000). Die Big Two Seelische Gesundheit und Verhaltenskontrolle: Zwei orthogonale Superfaktoren hoherer Ordnung [The Big Two mental health and behavioral control: Two orthogonal higher order super factors]. Zeitschrift furDifferentielle undDiagnostischePsychologie, 21(2), 113-124. doi:10.1024//0170-1789.21.2.113
Becker, P., & Minsel, B. (1986). Psychologie der seelischen Gesundheit. Personlichkeitspsychologische Grundlagen, Bedingungsanalysen und Forderungsmoglichkeiten [Psychology of mental health. Basics of personality psychology, analyses of conditions and support possibilities] (Vol. 2). Gottingen: Hogrefe.
Benedek, M., Franz, F., Heene, M., & Neubauer, A. C. (2012). Differential effects of cognitive inhibition and intelligence on creativity. Personality and Individual Differences, 53(4), 480-485. doi:10.1016/j. paid.2012.04.014 PMID:22945970
Bonnardel, R. (1971). Batterie factorielle standard [Standard factor battery]. Issy-les-Moulineaux, France: Editions Scientifiques et Psychologiques.
Cain, S. (2013). Quiet: The power of introverts in a world that can’t stop talking. Crown Publishing Group.
Calaprice, A. (Ed.). (2011). The ultimate quotable Einstein. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
Caroff, X., & Besangon, M. (2008). Variability of creativity judgments. Learning and Individual Differences, 18(4), 367-371. doi:10.1016/j.lindif.2008.04.001
Cattell, R. B. (1963). The personality and motivation of the researcher from measurements of contem-poraries and from biography. In C. W. Taylor & F. Barron (Eds.), Scientific creativity. New York: Wiley.
Cattell, R. B., & Drevdahl, J. E. (1955). A comparison of the personality profile (16 P. F.) of eminent researchers with that of eminent teachers and administrators, and of the general populations. British Journal of Psychology, 46(4), 248-261. doi:10.1111/j.2044-8295.1955.tb00547.x PMID:13269755
Chambers, J. A. (1964). Relating personality and biographical factors to scientific creativity. Psychological Monographs, 78(7), 1-20. doi:10.1037/h0093862
Comte, A. (1855). The positive philosophy of Auguste Comte (H. Martineau, Trans.). New York: Calvin Blanchard. (Original work published 1839-1842).
Costa, P. T., & McCrae, R. R. (1985). NEO-PI: NEO personality inventory [Manual]. Odessa, FL: Psychological Assessment Resources.
Costa, P. T., & McCrae, R. R. (1989). NEO-PI/FFI: NEO personality inventory /five-factor inventory [Manual supplement]. Odessa, FL: Psychological Assessment Resources.
Costa, P. T. Jr, & McCrae, R. R. (1992). NEO-PI-R: Revised NEO personality inventory and NEO-FFI: NEO five-factor inventory [Professional manual]. Odessa, FL: Psychological Assessment Resources.
Cropley, A. J. (2001). Creativity in education & learning: A guide for teachers and educators. Psychology Press.
Cropley, D. H. (2015). Promoting creativity and innovation in engineering education. Psychology of Aesthetics, Creativity, and the Arts, 9(2), 161-171. doi:10.1037/aca0000008
Dewett, T. (2006). Exploring the role of risk in employee creativity. The Journal of Creative Behavior, 40(1), 27-45. doi:10.1002/j.2162-6057.2006.tb01265.x
DeYoung, C. G., Peterson, J. B., & Higgins, D. M. (2002). Higher-order factors of the Big Five predict conformity: Are there neuroses of health? Personality and Individual Differences, 33(4), 533-552. doi:10.1016/S0191-8869(01)00171-4
Eysenck, H. J. (1990). Genetic and environmental contributions to individual differences: The three major dimensions of personality. Journal of Personality, 58(1), 245-261. doi:10.1111/j.1467-6494.1990. tb00915.x PMID:23750379
Eysenck, H. J. (1993). Creativity and personality: Suggestions for a theory. Psychological Inquiry, 4(3), 147-178. doi:10.120715327965pli0403_1
Eysenck, H. J. (1995). Genius: The natural history of creativity. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press. doi:10.1017/CBO9780511752247
Eysenck, H. J., & Eysenck, S. B. G. (1992). EPS-A: Eysenck personality scales- adult [Manual]. London: Hodder & Stoughton.
Feist, G. J. (1993). A structural model of scientific eminence. Psychological Science, 4(6), 366-371. doi:10.1111/j.1467-9280.1993.tb00583.x
Feist, G. J. (1998). A meta-analysis of personality in scientific and artistic creativity. Personality and Social Psychology Review, 2(4), 290-309. doi:10.120715327957pspr0204_5 PMID:15647135
Feist, G. J. (1999). The influence of personality on artistic and scientific creativity. In R. J. Sternberg (Ed.), Handbook of creativity (pp. 273-296). New York: Cambridge University Press.
Feist, G. J. (2006). How development and personality influence scientific thought, interest, and achieve-ment. Review of General Psychology, 10(2), 163-182. doi:10.1037/1089-2680.10.2.163
Feist, G. J., & Gorman, M. E. (1998). The psychology of science: Review and integration of a nascent discipline. Review of General Psychology, 2(1), 3-47. doi:10.1037/1089-2680.2.1.3
Feldhusen, J. F., & Treffinger, D. J. (1975). Teachers’ attitudes and practices in teaching creativity and problem-solving to economically disadvantaged and minority children. Psychological Reports, 37(3f), 1161-1162. doi:10.2466/pr0.1975.37.3f.1161
Gardner, H. (1983). Frames of mind: The theory of multiple intelligences. New York, NY: Basics Books.
Gardner, H. (1993). Multiple intelligences: The theory in practice. New York, NY: Basic Books.
Gardner, M. K., & Sternberg, R. J. (1994). Novelty and intelligence. In R. J. Sternberg & R. Wagner (Eds.), Mind in context: Interactionistperspectives on human intelligence (pp. 38-71). Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
Glaveanu, V. P. (2014). The psychology of creativity: A critical reading. Creativity: Theory-Research-Applications., 1(1), 10-32. doi:10.15290/ctra.2014.01.01.02
Gorman, M. E., Gorman, M. E., Latta, R. M., & Cunningham, G. (1984). How disconfirmatory, con-firmatory and combined strategies affect group problem solving. British Journal of Psychology, 75(1), 65-79. doi:10.1111/j.2044-8295.1984.tb02790.x
Gregory, R. L. (1981). Mind in science: A history of explanations in psychology and physics. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Hathaway, S. R., & McKinley, J. C. (1996). MMPI-2: Inventaire multiphasique depersonnalité du Min-nesota-2 [Manuel]. Paris: Editions du Centre de Psychologie Appliquée.
Hathaway, S. R., & McKinley, J. C. (2000). MMPI-2: Minnesota multiphasic personality inventory-2 [Manual]. (R. Engel, Trans. & Ed.). Bern: Hans Huber.
Hennessey, B. A. (2015). If I were Secretary of Education: A focus on intrinsic motivation and creativity in the classroom. Psychology of Aesthetics, Creativity, and the Arts, 9(2), 187-192. doi:10.1037/aca0000012
Holton, G. (1971-1972). On trying to understand scientific genius. The American Scholar, 41, 95-110.
Ibarra, H., & Andrews, S. B. (1993). Power, social influence, and sense making: Effects of network centrality and proximity on employee perceptions. Administrative Science Quarterly, 38(2), 277-303. doi:10.2307/2393414
Jarvela, S., & Hakkinen, P. (2002). Web-based cases in teaching and learning-the quality of discussions and a stage of perspective taking in asynchronous communication. Interactive Learning Environments, 10(1), 1-22. doi:10.1076/ilee.10.1.1.3613
Johnson, D. W., & Johnson, R. T. (1989). Cooperation and competition: Theory and research. Edina, MN: Interaction Book.
Kaufman, J. C., & Baer, J. (2006). Creativity research in English-speaking countries. In J. C. Kaufman & R. J. Sternberg (Eds.), The international handbook of creativity (pp. 10-38). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. doi:10.1017/CBO9780511818240
Kwang, N. A., Ang, R. P., Ooi, L. B., Shin, W. S., Oei, T. P. S., & Leng, V. (2005). Do adaptors and innovators subscribe to opposing values? Creativity Research Journal, 17(2-3), 273-281. doi:10.1080 /10400419.2005.9651485
Lindenberger, U., & Baltes, P. B. (1997). Intellectual functioning in old and very old age: Cross-sec-tional results from the Berlin Aging Study. Psychology and Aging, 12(3), 410-432. doi:10.1037/0882-7974.12.3.410 PMID:9308090
Lubart, T., Mouchiroud, C., Tordjman, S., & Zenasni, F. (2003). Psychologie de la créativité [Psychology of creativity]. Paris: Armand Colin.
Lubart, T., Pacteau, C., Jacquet, A.-Y., & Caroff, X. (2010). Children’s creative potential: An empiri-cal study of measurement issues. Learning and Individual Differences, 20(4), 388-392. doi:10.1016/j. lindif.2010.02.006
Lubart, T. I., Besangon, M., & Barbot, B. (2011). Evaluation du potentiel créatif (EPoC). Paris: Edi-tions Hogrefe.
Lubart, T. I., & Sternberg, R. J. (1995). An investment approach to creativity: Theory and data. In S. M. Smith, T. B. Ward, & R. A. Finke (Eds.), The creative cognition approach (pp. 271-30). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
Ludwig, A. M. (1995). The price of greatness: Resolving the creativity and madness controversy. New-York. Guilford Press.
MacDonald, R., Miell, D., & Morgan, L. (2000). Social processes and creative collaboration in children. European Journal of Psychology of Education, 15(4), 405-415. doi:10.1007/BF03172984
McCrae, R. R. (1987). Creativity, divergent thinking, and openness to experience. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 52(6), 1258-1265. doi:10.1037/0022-3514.52.6.1258
Mednick, S. (1962). The associative basis of the creative process. Psychological Review, 69(3), 220-232. doi:10.1037/h0048850 PMID:14472013
Miell, D., & Littleton, K. (2004). Collaborative creativity: Contemporary perspectives. London: Free Association Books.
Nolan, F. (1978). The sound of music: The story of Hammerstein. New York: Walter Company.
Oztunc, G. (2011). Personality: Autonomy and independence. In M. A. Runco & S. R. Pritzker (Eds.), Encyclopedia of creativity (Vol. 2, pp. 224-227). San Diego, CA: Academic Press. doi:10.1016/B978-0-12-375038-9.00019-4
Peterson, J. B., & Carson, S. (2000). Latent inhibition and openness to experience in a high-achieving student population. Personality and Individual Differences, 28(2), 323-332. doi:10.1016/S0191-8869(99)00101-4
Peterson, J. B., Smith, K. W., & Carson, S. (2002). Openness and extraversion are associated with reduced latent inhibition: Replication and commentary. Personality and Individual Differences, 33(7), 1137-1147. doi:10.1016/S0191-8869(02)00004-1
Piirto, J. (1998). Understanding those who create (2nd ed.). Scottsdale, AZ: Gifted Psychology Press.
Post, F. (1994). Creativity and psychopathology: A study of 291 world famous men. The British Journal of Psychiatry, 165(1), 22-34. doi:10.1192/bjp.165.1.22 PMID:7953036
Pritzker, S. R., & Runco, M. A. (1997). The creative decision-making process in group situation comedy writing. In R. K. Sawyer (Ed.), Creativity in performance (pp. 115-142). Norwood, NJ: Ablex.
Rammstedt, B., & John, O. P. (2007). Measuring personality in one minute or less: A 10-item short version of the Big Five inventory in English and German. Journal of Research in Personality, 41(1), 203-212. doi:10.1016/j.jrp.2006.02.001
Roe, A. (1953). The making of a scientist. New York: Dodd Mead.
Runco, M. A., Dow, G., & Smith, W. R. (2006). Information, experience, and divergent thinking: An empirical test. Creativity Research Journal, 18(3), 269-277. doi:10.120715326934crj1803_4
Rushton, J. P. (1990). Creativity, intelligence, and psychoticism. Personality and Individual Differences, 11(12), 1291-1298. doi:10.1016/0191-8869(90)90156-L
Sak, U. (2010). Assessment of creativity: Focus on math and science. In 12th European Council for High Ability-ECHA Congress.
Sak, U., & Ayas, M. B. (2013). Creative Scientific Ability Test C-SAT: A new measure of scientific creativity. Psychological Test and Assessment Modeling, 55(3), 316-329.
Salthouse, T. A. (1993). Speed and knowledge as determinants of adult age differences in verbal tasks. Journal of Gerontology, 48(1), 29-36. doi:10.1093/geronj/48.1.P29 PMID:8418147
Sawyer, R. K. (2012). The science of human innovation: Explaining creativity. New York: Oxford University Press.
Schoppe, K. J. (1975). Verbaler Kreativitats-Test-VKT: Ein Verfahren zur Erfassung verbal-produktiver Kreativitatsmerkmale [Verbal creativity test]. Gottingen: Hogrefe.
Simonton, D. K. (1985). Quality, quantity, and age: The careers of ten distinguished psychologists. International Journal of Aging & Human Development, 21(4), 241-254. doi:10.2190/KB7E-A45M-X8X7-DQJ4 PMID:3830907
Simonton, D. K. (1988). Scientific genius: A psychology of science. Cambridge, MA: Cambridge University Press.
Simonton, D. K. (1994). Greatness: Who makes history and why. New York, NY: Guilford Press.
Simonton, D. K. (1999). Significant samples: The psychological study of eminent individuals. Psychological Methods, 4(4), 425-451. doi:10.1037/1082-989X.4.4.425
Simonton, D. K. (2002). Great psychologists and their times: Scientific insights into psychology’s history. Washington, DC: American Psychological Association. doi:10.1037/10466-000
Simonton, D. K. (2003). Scientific creativity as constrained stochastic behavior: The integration of product, person, and process perspectives. Psychological Bulletin, 129(4), 475-494. doi:10.1037/0033-2909.129.4.475 PMID:12848217
Simonton, D. K. (2004). Creativity in science: Chance, logic, genius, andzeitgeist. New York: Cambridge University Press; doi:10.1017/CBO9781139165358
Simonton, D. K. (2009). Varieties of (scientific) creativity: A hierarchical model of domain-specific disposition, development, and achievement. Perspectives on Psychological Science, 4(5), 441-452. doi:10.1111/j.1745-6924.2009.01152.x PMID:26162214
Simonton, D. K. (2013). Creativity in psychology: On becoming and being a great psychologist. In J. C. Kaufman & J. Baer (Eds.), Creativity across domains: Face of the muse (pp. 139-151). New York: Psychology Press.
Spearman, C. (1927). The abilities of man: Their nature and measurement. London: Macmillan.
Sternberg, R. J. (1985). Beyond IQ: A triarchic theory of human intelligence. Cambridge, MA: Cambridge University Press.
Sternberg, R. J. (2003). What is an “expert student”? Educational Researcher, 32(8), 5-9. doi:10.3102/0013189X032008005
Sternberg, R. J. (2005). The theory of successful intelligence. Interamerican Journal of Psychology, 39(2), 189-202.
Sternberg, R. J. (2015). Teaching for creativity: The sounds of silence. Psychology of Aesthetics, Creativity, and the Arts, 9(2), 115-121. doi:10.1037/aca0000007
Taggar, S. (2002). Individual creativity and group ability to utilize individual creative resources: A multilevel model. Academy of Management Journal, 45(2), 315-330. doi:10.2307/3069349
Terman, L. M. (1955). Are scientists different? Scientific American, 192(1), 25-29. doi:10.1038cienti ficamerican0155-25
Urban, K. K. (2005). Assessing creativity: The test of creative thinking-drawing production (TCT-DP). International Education Journal, 6(2), 272-280.
Urban, K. K., & Jellen, H. G. (1995). TSD-Z: Testzum Schopferischen Denken - Zeichenerisch [Manual]. Frankfurt: Swets Test Services.
