Article (Scientific journals)
Parental (non-)pain attending verbalizations moderate the relationship between child attention and memory bias for pain
Wauters, Aline; Noel, Melanie; VAN RYCKEGHEM, Dimitri et al.
2020In EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF PAIN, 24 (9), p. 1797--1811
Peer reviewed
 

Files


Full Text
ejp.1627.pdf
Publisher postprint (173.28 kB)
Request a copy

All documents in ORBilu are protected by a user license.

Send to



Details



Keywords :
Anesthesiology and Pain Medicine; COLD PRESSOR TASK; EXPERIENTIAL AVOIDANCE; ANXIETY; BEHAVIOR; IMPACT; SCALE; INTENSITY; TOLERANCE; DISTRESS; THREAT
Abstract :
[en] Background: Children's negatively biased pain‐related memories (i.e. recalling pain as being more intense or fearful than initially reported) have been recognized as a key factor in explaining child pain development. While mechanisms underlying children's pain memory development remain poorly understood, attention biases and parent language have been implicated in conceptual models. This study examined the association between child pain‐related attention and memory biases and the moderating role of parental pain and non‐pain attending verbalizations. Methods: Participants were 51 school children and one of their parents. Probability of initial fixation and gaze duration to pain were assessed using eye tracking methodology. Children performed a cold pressor task (CPT) and reported on experienced pain intensity and pain‐related fear. A 3‐minute parent–child interaction upon CPT completion allowed measurement of parental pain and non‐pain attending verbalizations. Children's pain‐related memories were elicited 2 weeks later. Results: Findings indicated that the relationship between maintained attention to pain and fear memory bias was moderated by parental non‐pain attending verbalizations such that higher gaze duration bias was positively associated with fear memory bias but only among children whose parents demonstrated low levels of non‐pain attending verbalizations. The opposite pattern was observed for children whose parents showed high levels of non‐pain attending verbalizations. No such effects were observed for child initial attention bias to pain, memory bias for pain and parental pain attending verbalizations. Conclusions: Findings highlight the importance of parental and child pain‐related variables as well as their interaction in understanding negatively biased pain‐related memories. Significance: This study on child pain memories is the first to highlight that characteristics of the social context, such as parental (non‐)pain‐related verbalizations, as well as factors related to the intra‐individual experience of pain, such as child attention bias to pain, should be studied jointly, as they interact with each other in their effect on the emergence of negatively biased memories of painful events.
Disciplines :
Theoretical & cognitive psychology
Author, co-author :
Wauters, Aline
Noel, Melanie
VAN RYCKEGHEM, Dimitri ;  University of Luxembourg > Faculty of Humanities, Education and Social Sciences (FHSE) > Department of Behavioural and Cognitive Sciences (DBCS)
Sanchez Lopez, Alvaro
Vervoort, Tine
External co-authors :
yes
Language :
English
Title :
Parental (non-)pain attending verbalizations moderate the relationship between child attention and memory bias for pain
Publication date :
2020
Journal title :
EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF PAIN
ISSN :
1090-3801
Volume :
24
Issue :
9
Pages :
1797--1811
Peer reviewed :
Peer reviewed
Available on ORBilu :
since 03 March 2021

Statistics


Number of views
28 (2 by Unilu)
Number of downloads
1 (1 by Unilu)

Scopus citations®
 
12
Scopus citations®
without self-citations
2
OpenCitations
 
8
OpenAlex citations
 
12
WoS citations
 
12

Bibliography


Similar publications



Contact ORBilu