Gabbay, Dov M. ; University of Luxembourg > Faculty of Science, Technology and Communication (FSTC) > Computer Science and Communications Research Unit (CSC)
Horne, Ross James ; University of Luxembourg > Faculty of Science, Technology and Medicine (FSTM) > Department of Computer Science (DCS)
Mauw, Sjouke ; University of Luxembourg > Faculty of Science, Technology and Medicine (FSTM) > Department of Computer Science (DCS)
van der Torre, Leon ; University of Luxembourg > Faculty of Science, Technology and Medicine (FSTM) > Department of Computer Science (DCS)
External co-authors :
no
Language :
English
Title :
Attack-Defence Frameworks: Argumentation-Based Semantics for Attack-Defence Trees.
Publication date :
2020
Event name :
GraMSec 2020
Event place :
Boston, MA, United States
Event date :
June 22, 2020 Revised Selected Papers. Lecture Notes in Computer Science 12419, Springer 2020, ISBN 978-3-030-62229-9
Main work title :
Graphical Models for Security - 7th International Workshop
Bistarelli, S., Fioravanti, F., Peretti, P.: Defense trees for economic evaluation of security investments. In: First International Conference on Availability, Reliability and Security (ARES 2006), vol. 423 p. 8 (2006)
Cayrol, C., Lagasquie-Schiex, M.C.: On the acceptability of arguments in bipolar argumentation frameworks. In: Godo, L. (ed.) ECSQARU 2005. LNCS (LNAI), vol. 3571, pp. 378– 389. Springer, Heidelberg (2005). https://doi.org/10.1007/11518655 33
Boella, G., Gabbay, D.M., van der Torre, L.W.N., Villata, S.: Support in abstract argumentation. In: Baroni, P., Cerutti, F., Giacomin, M., Simari, G.R., (eds.): Computational Models of Argument: Proceedings of COMMA 2010 of Frontiers in Artificial Intelligence and Applications., Desenzano del Garda, Italy, 8–10 September 2010. vol. 216, IOS Press pp. 111–122 (2010)
Wideł, W.: Formal modeling and quantitative analysis of security using attack-defense trees. PhD thesis (2019)
Dung, P.M.: On the acceptability of arguments and its fundamental role in nonmonotonic reasoning, logic programming and n-person games. Artif. Intell. 77, 321–357 (1995)
Gabbay, D.M.: Semantics for higher level attacks in extended argumentation frames part 1: overview. Stud. Logica. 93, 355–379 (2009)
Nielsen, S.H., Parsons, S.: A generalization of dung’s abstract framework for argumentation: arguing with sets of attacking arguments. In: Maudet, N., Parsons, S., Rahwan, I. (eds.) ArgMAS 2006. LNCS (LNAI), vol. 4766, pp. 54–73. Springer, Heidelberg (2007). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-540-75526-5 4
Schneier, B.: Attack trees. Dr. Dobb’s J. 24, 21–29 (1999)
Mauw, S., Oostdijk, M.: Foundations of attack trees. In: Won, D.H., Kim, S. (eds.) ICISC 2005. LNCS, vol. 3935, pp. 186–198. Springer, Heidelberg (2006). https://doi.org/10.1007/11734727 17
Gabbay, D., Gabbay, M.: Theory of disjunctive attacks, part I. Logic J. IGPL 24, 186–218 (2016)
Armbrust, M., et al.: A view of cloud computing. Commun. ACM 53, 50–58 (2010)
Gabbay, D.: Logical foundations for bipolar argumentation networks. J. Logic Comput. 26, 247–292 (2016)
Filimonov, I., Horne, R., Mauw, S., Smith, Z.: Breaking unlinkability of the ICAO 9303 standard for e-Passports using bisimilarity. In: Sako, K., Schneider, S., Ryan, P.Y.A. (eds.) ESORICS 2019. LNCS, vol. 11735, pp. 577–594. Springer, Cham (2019). https://doi.org/10. 1007/978-3-030-29959-0 28
Horne, R., Mauw, S., Tiu, A.: Semantics for specialising attack trees based on linear logic. Fundam. Inform. 153, 57–86 (2017)
Eades III, H., Jiang, J., Bryant, A.: On linear logic, functional programming, and attack trees. In: Cybenko, G., Pym, D., Fila, B. (eds.) GraMSec 2018. LNCS, vol. 11086, pp. 71–89. Springer, Cham (2019). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-15465-3 5
Mantel, H., Probst, C.W.: On the meaning and purpose of attack trees. In: 2019 IEEE 32nd Computer Security Foundations Symposium (CSF), pp. 184–199 (2019)
Barringer, H., Gabbay, D.M., Woods, J.: Temporal, numerical and meta-level dynamics in argumentation networks. Argument Comput. 3, 143–202 (2012)
