Reference : The compatibility of ISDS provisions in bilateral investment treaties and the Energy ...
Dissertations and theses : Doctoral thesis
Law, criminology & political science : European & international law
Law / European Law
http://hdl.handle.net/10993/44447
The compatibility of ISDS provisions in bilateral investment treaties and the Energy Charter Treaty with EU law
English
[fr] La compatibilité des dispositions ISDS des traités bilatéraux d'investissement et du Traité sur la Charte de l'Energie avec le droit de l'UE
[nl] De compatibiliteit van ISDS provisies in bilaterale investeringsakkoorden en het Energiehandvest verdrag met EU recht
de Boeck, Michael Karel Marc mailto [University of Luxembourg > Faculty of Law, Economics and Finance (FDEF) > >]
14-Jul-2020
Université Luxembourg, ​Luxembourg, ​​Luxembourg
Ghent University, ​Ghent, ​​Belgium
Docteur en Droit
xii, 442
Happold, Matthew mailto
Piers, Maud mailto
Tison, Michel mailto
Hess, Burkhard mailto
Menetrey, Séverine mailto
Ruys, Tom mailto
[en] ISDS ; international investment arbitration ; Achmea ; opinion 1/17 ; autonomy ; Energy Charter Treaty ; BIT ; bilateral investment treaties ; foreign direct investment ; FDI ; treaty conflict ; common commercial policy ; 207 TFEU
[en] Since the 1960’s, EU Member States concluded a vast network of international investment agreements (IIA’s). Such treaties typically offer substantive investment protection standards and investor-state arbitration provisions (ISDS). It is disputed whether those treaties conflict with EU law and whether they can still be relied on against EU Member States and by whom. It is submitted that the relationship between international investment law and EU law can only be understood by clearly separating the issues of international validity and applicability of those treaties from their effects in the EU legal order. The first is determined by international conflict norms, while the second is determined only by reference to EU law itself. The thesis therefore adopts three parts. The first approaches the interaction between EU law and the IIA’s through the lens of the conflict norms of international law. After considering the framework of “harmonious interpretation” and “successive treaty” conflicts, the thesis concludes that despite the existence of a certain overlap or conflict between the EU treaties and IIA’s, the ISDS provisions of IIA’s remain valid and applicable under international law. Investors can therefore continue to rely on them against EU Member States. In a second part, the thesis considers the status and legal value of IIA’s in the EU legal order in light of the internal developments of EU law. The post-Lisbon transfer of competence on Foreign Direct Investment to the EU raised many questions with few answers. The second part therefore sets out the framework of EU law conflict norms and the legal effect of the ECT and BITs in the EU legal order. It is concluded that the BITs enjoy only limited recognition in the EU legal order through article 351 TFEU, which is however bounded by the notion of the autonomy of EU law. In the third part, the thesis examines whether the ISDS provisions of the BITs and the ECT are compatible with the autonomy of EU law. After constructing the role, meaning and requirements of autonomy in relation to international dispute resolution, the thesis concludes that the ISDS provisions in the ECT and BITs are incompatible with the autonomy of EU law. Thus, the ISDS provisions cannot be applied in the EU legal order, but remain valid internationally.
Max Planck Institute Luxembourg for International, European and Regulatory Procedural Law
Max Planck Institute Luxembourg for International, European and Regulatory Procedural Law
http://hdl.handle.net/10993/44447

File(s) associated to this reference

Fulltext file(s):

FileCommentaryVersionSizeAccess
Limited access
20200930 PhD Michael De Boeck - UNILU v2.pdfAuthor preprint3.56 MBRequest a copy

Bookmark and Share SFX Query

All documents in ORBilu are protected by a user license.