Reference : Ultrafast scanning calorimetry of newly developed Au-Ga bulk metallic glasses
Scientific journals : Article
Physical, chemical, mathematical & earth Sciences : Physics
Physics and Materials Science
http://hdl.handle.net/10993/43498
Ultrafast scanning calorimetry of newly developed Au-Ga bulk metallic glasses
English
Baller, Jörg* mailto [University of Luxembourg > Faculty of Science, Technology and Communication (FSTC) > Physics and Materials Science Research Unit >]
Neuber, Nico* [Saarland University - UdS]
Frey, Maximilian [Saarland University - UdS]
Cross, Oliver [Saarland University - UdS]
Gallino, Isabella [Saarland University - UdS]
Busch, Ralf []
* These authors have contributed equally to this work.
2020
Journal of Physics: Condensed Matter
Institute of Physics Publishing
32
32
Special Issue on Liquid and Amorphous Metals
324001
Yes (verified by ORBilu)
International
0953-8984
1361-648X
Bristol
United Kingdom
[en] The isothermal crystallization times and critical cooling rates of the liquid phase are determined for the two bulk metallic glass forming alloys Au49Ag5.5Pd2.3Cu26.9Si16.3 and Au51.6Ag5.8Pd2.4Cu20.2Ga6.7Si13.3 by using fast differential scanning calorimetry, covering the whole timescale of the crystallization event of the metallic melt. In the case of Au49Ag5.5Pd2.3Cu26.9Si16.3, a typical crystallization nose was observed, whereas for the Au51.6Ag5.8Pd2.4Cu20.2Ga6.7Si13.3, a more complex crystallization behavior with two distinct crystallization noses was found. Even for the complex crystallization behavior of the Au51.6Ag5.8Pd2.4Cu20.2Ga6.7Si13.3 alloy it is shown that the minimal isothermal nose time ${{\tau}}_{x}^{{\ast}}$ does allow for a quantification of the macroscopic critical thickness. It is discussed in contrast to the critical cooling rate, which is found to allow less exact calculations of the critical thickness and thus does not correlate well with the critical cooling rate from macroscopic experiments. Additionally the crystallization data of Au49Ag5.5Pd2.3Cu26.9Si16.3 was modeled using classical nucleation theory with the Johnson–Mehl–Avrami–Kolmogorov (JMAK) equation, enabling a determination of the interfacial energy.
Researchers ; Professionals
http://hdl.handle.net/10993/43498
10.1088/1361-648X/ab8252
https://iopscience.iop.org/article/10.1088/1361-648X/ab8252#artAbst

File(s) associated to this reference

Fulltext file(s):

FileCommentaryVersionSizeAccess
Open access
Neuber_2020_J._Phys. _Condens._Matter_32_324001.pdfPublisher postprint1.88 MBView/Open

Bookmark and Share SFX Query

All documents in ORBilu are protected by a user license.