Economic and Monetary Union; Single Market; Banking Union; financial regulation; banking supervision; European Central Bank; Single Supervisory Mechanism
Résumé :
[en] This contribution combines neo-functionalism and historical institutionalism to understand the implications of differentiated integration in Economic and Monetary Union (EMU) and Banking Union (BU) for the single market in financial services in the European Union (EU). From the 1980s, the relaunch of the Single Market and monetary integration in the EU were presented by the supporters of EMU as mutually reinforcing, as in the logic of the Commission’s Report ‘One Market, One Money’. Initially, EMU appeared to reinforce financial integration, especially in the Euro Area banking sector, even though EMU was a case of differentiated integration in the EU. Subsequently, the incomplete EMU triggered the sovereign debt crisis, which undermined financial market integration and was addressed through the establishment of BU, which reinforced differentiated integration. Both EMU and BU have negative implications for the ‘singleness’ of the single market in financial services, potentially resulting in ‘One Money, Two Markets’.
HOWARTH, David ; University of Luxembourg > Faculty of Language and Literature, Humanities, Arts and Education (FLSHASE) > Identités, Politiques, Sociétés, Espaces (IPSE)
Quaglia, Lucia; University of Bologna
Co-auteurs externes :
yes
Langue du document :
Anglais
Titre :
One money, two markets? EMU at twenty and European financial market integration
Date de publication/diffusion :
mars 2020
Titre du périodique :
Journal of European Integration
ISSN :
0703-6337
eISSN :
1477-2280
Maison d'édition :
Routledge, Royaume-Uni
Titre particulier du numéro :
Economic and Monetary Union at Twenty: A Stocktaking of a Tumultuous Second decade