Reference : Which Properties has an Icon? A Critical Discussion on Evaluation Methods for Standar... |
Scientific congresses, symposiums and conference proceedings : Paper published in a book | |||
Law, criminology & political science : Multidisciplinary, general & others Engineering, computing & technology : Computer science Engineering, computing & technology : Multidisciplinary, general & others Arts & humanities : Multidisciplinary, general & others | |||
Security, Reliability and Trust | |||
http://hdl.handle.net/10993/41862 | |||
Which Properties has an Icon? A Critical Discussion on Evaluation Methods for Standardised Data Protection Iconography | |
English | |
Rossi, Arianna ![]() | |
Lenzini, Gabriele ![]() | |
2021 | |
Proceedings of the 8th Workshop on Socio-Technical Aspects in Security and Trust (STAST) | |
Springer | |
Yes | |
No | |
International | |
8th Workshop on Socio-Technical Aspects in Security and Trust (STAST) | |
26-09-2019 | |
Luxembourg | |
Luxembourg | |
[en] Icons ; Graphical symbols ; Pictograms ; Evaluation ; Data protection ; Privacy ; Transparency ; Security ; Standardization ; GDPR ; ISO ; Compliance | |
[en] Following GDPR's Article12.7's proposal to use standardized
icons to inform data subject in "an easily visible, intelligible and clearly legible manner," several icon sets have been developed. In this paper, we firstly critically review some of those proposals. We then examine the properties that icons and icon sets should arguably fulfill according to Art.12's transparency provisions. Lastly, we discuss metrics and evaluation procedures to measure compliance with the Article. | |
Researchers ; Professionals ; Students ; General public | |
http://hdl.handle.net/10993/41862 |
File(s) associated to this reference | ||||||||||||||
Fulltext file(s):
| ||||||||||||||
All documents in ORBilu are protected by a user license.