Which Properties has an Icon? A Critical Discussion on Evaluation Methods for Standardised Data Protection Iconography

Rossi, Arianna; Lenzini, Gabriele

Reference : Which Properties has an Icon? A Critical Discussion on Evaluation Methods for Standar...


	Document type :	Scientific congresses, symposiums and conference proceedings : Paper published in a book
	Discipline(s) :	Law, criminology & political science : Multidisciplinary, general & others Engineering, computing & technology : Computer science Engineering, computing & technology : Multidisciplinary, general & others Arts & humanities : Multidisciplinary, general & others
	Focus Areas :	Security, Reliability and Trust
	To cite this reference:	http://hdl.handle.net/10993/41862

Title :	Which Properties has an Icon? A Critical Discussion on Evaluation Methods for Standardised Data Protection Iconography
Language :	English
Author, co-author :	Rossi, Arianna [University of Luxembourg > Interdisciplinary Centre for Security, Reliability and Trust (SNT) > Computer Science and Communications Research Unit (CSC) >]
	Lenzini, Gabriele [University of Luxembourg > Interdisciplinary Centre for Security, Reliability and Trust (SNT) > >]
Publication date :	2021
Main document title :	Proceedings of the 8th Workshop on Socio-Technical Aspects in Security and Trust (STAST)
Publisher :	Springer
Peer reviewed :	Yes
On invitation :	No
Audience :	International
Event name :	8th Workshop on Socio-Technical Aspects in Security and Trust (STAST)
Event date :	26-09-2019
Event place (city) :	Luxembourg
Event country :	Luxembourg
Keywords :	[en] Icons ; Graphical symbols ; Pictograms ; Evaluation ; Data protection ; Privacy ; Transparency ; Security ; Standardization ; GDPR ; ISO ; Compliance
Abstract :	[en] Following GDPR's Article12.7's proposal to use standardized icons to inform data subject in "an easily visible, intelligible and clearly legible manner," several icon sets have been developed. In this paper, we firstly critically review some of those proposals. We then examine the properties that icons and icon sets should arguably fulfill according to Art.12's transparency provisions. Lastly, we discuss metrics and evaluation procedures to measure compliance with the Article.
Target :	Researchers ; Professionals ; Students ; General public
Permalink :	http://hdl.handle.net/10993/41862

File(s) associated to this reference

Fulltext file(s):

	File	Commentary	Version	Size	Access
Open access	STAST19_FINAL.pdf		Publisher postprint	686.29 kB	View/Open

All documents in ORBi^lu are protected by a user license.

University of Luxembourg Library | Feedback | Legal notices