Article (Scientific journals)
Multiple standards of aging: gender-specific age stereotypes in different life domains
KORNADT, Anna Elena; Voss, Peggy; Rothermund, Klaus
2013In European Journal of Ageing, 10 (4), p. 335-344
Peer Reviewed verified by ORBi
 

Files


Full Text
Kornadt, Voss, & Rothermund_2013_Gender specific age stereotypes in different life domains.pdf
Publisher postprint (540.85 kB)
Request a copy

All documents in ORBilu are protected by a user license.

Send to



Details



Abstract :
[en] Whereas it is often stated that aging might have more negative consequences for the evaluation of women compared to men, evidence for this assumption is mixed. We took a differentiated look at age stereotypes of men and women, assuming that the life domain in which older persons are rated moderates gender differences in age stereotypes. A sample of 298 participants aged 20-92 rated 65-year-old men and women on evaluative statements in eight different life domains. Furthermore, perceptions of gender-and domain-specific age-related changes were assessed by comparing the older targets to 45-year-old men and women, respectively. The results speak in favor of the domain specificity of evaluative asymmetries in age stereotypes for men and women, and imply that an understanding of gendered perceptions of aging requires taking into account the complexities of domain-specific views on aging.
Disciplines :
Social & behavioral sciences, psychology: Multidisciplinary, general & others
Author, co-author :
KORNADT, Anna Elena  ;  University of Luxembourg > Faculty of Language and Literature, Humanities, Arts and Education (FLSHASE) > Integrative Research Unit: Social and Individual Development (INSIDE)
Voss, Peggy
Rothermund, Klaus
External co-authors :
yes
Language :
English
Title :
Multiple standards of aging: gender-specific age stereotypes in different life domains
Publication date :
2013
Journal title :
European Journal of Ageing
ISSN :
1613-9372
eISSN :
1613-9380
Volume :
10
Issue :
4
Pages :
335-344
Peer reviewed :
Peer Reviewed verified by ORBi
Available on ORBilu :
since 02 December 2019

Statistics


Number of views
47 (2 by Unilu)
Number of downloads
2 (0 by Unilu)

Scopus citations®
 
60
Scopus citations®
without self-citations
52
OpenCitations
 
42
OpenAlex citations
 
66
WoS citations
 
53

publications
0
supporting
0
mentioning
0
contrasting
0
Smart Citations
0
0
0
0
Citing PublicationsSupportingMentioningContrasting
View Citations

See how this article has been cited at scite.ai

scite shows how a scientific paper has been cited by providing the context of the citation, a classification describing whether it supports, mentions, or contrasts the cited claim, and a label indicating in which section the citation was made.

Bibliography


Similar publications



Sorry the service is unavailable at the moment. Please try again later.
Contact ORBilu