| Reference : Judicial Independence & National Judges in the Recent Case law of the Court of Justice |
| Scientific journals : Article | |||
| Law, criminology & political science : European & international law | |||
| Law / European Law | |||
| http://hdl.handle.net/10993/39534 | |||
| Judicial Independence & National Judges in the Recent Case law of the Court of Justice | |
| English | |
Zinonos, Panagiotis  [University of Luxembourg > Faculty of Law, Economics and Finance (FDEF) > Law Research Unit >] | |
| 2019 | |
| European Public Law | |
| Kluwer | |
| 25 | |
| 4 | |
| 615–636 | |
| Yes | |
| International | |
| [en] Judicial independence did not only become more visible in the recent case law of the Court of
justice but has also been analysed as a systemic parameter of the Union. This article discusses a sample of three cases, Associação Sindical dos Juízes Portugueses, Achmea, and L.M., to assess the notion of judicial independence as applying regarding the national judges in the judicial system of the Union. Judicial independence, as a notion of EU law, is primarily a constitutional requirement presumably deferent to Member States’ standards and pursuing the proper functioning of the Union’s judicial system, namely its effectiveness. However, the recent case law testifies the emergence of a common EU standard of judicial independence, which does not only apply as a minimum standard throughout the Union but also affects the national legal orders. Ultimately, the analyses of the paper point out a curious harmony regarding judicial independence between the principles of effectiveness of Union law and of effective judicial protection under that law without clarifying their articulation. | |
| Researchers ; Professionals ; Students | |
| http://hdl.handle.net/10993/39534 |
| File(s) associated to this reference | ||||||||||||||
|
Fulltext file(s):
| ||||||||||||||
All documents in ORBilu are protected by a user license.
