| Reference : PCD 2.0? Normative Policy Coherence for Development across Generations |
| Scientific congresses, symposiums and conference proceedings : Unpublished conference | |||
| Law, criminology & political science : Political science, public administration & international relations | |||
| http://hdl.handle.net/10993/38647 | |||
| PCD 2.0? Normative Policy Coherence for Development across Generations | |
| English | |
Häbel, Sandra  [University of Luxembourg > Faculty of Language and Literature, Humanities, Arts and Education (FLSHASE) > >] | |
| 2017 | |
| No | |
| International | |
| EADI-NORDIC Conference 2017 | |
| from 21-08-2017 to 23-08-2017 | |
| EADI | |
| Bergen | |
| Norway | |
| [en] Policy Coherence for Development (PCD) ; norms ; EU External Policies ; normative commitment | |
| [en] Policy coherence for development (PCD) has developed into an important approach towards
development in the international arena. The recent commitment to the UN Sustainable Development Goals (SGDs) have simultaneously added a normative dimension to the global development debate. This paper assesses the EU’s commitment to norms by applying normative policy coherence for development (NPCD) to the EU’s policies towards Vietnam. The question of normative commitment across a post-Maastricht and a post-Lisbon time frame is assessed using content analysis of policy documents. The results indicate that the commitment to norms is varied. While the commitment to human rights, sustainable development and gender equality is quite evident, do the norms solidarity, liberty and peace receive show less prominence. Overall, the commitment seems to remain at the policy formulation level but is not represented in short-term implementing programs. | |
| http://hdl.handle.net/10993/38647 |
There is no file associated with this reference.
All documents in ORBilu are protected by a user license.
