Voy. W. Eyskens & N. Kaluma, « La “class action” et le droit belge. Un va-et-vient de part et d’autre de l’Atlantique», J.T. 2008/27, p. 481.
Voy. H. Koch, « Mass Damage in Europe: Aggregation of Claims, Effective Enforcement and Adequate Representation», in W.H. van Boom and G. Wagner (eds.), Mass Torts in Europe: Cases and Reflections, De Gruyter, 2014, 11.1.
BEUC, « Litigation Funding in Relation to the Establishment of a European Mechanism of Collective Redress», 2012.
C. kessedjian, « Préface», in Financement de contentieux par un tiers. Third Party Litigation Funding, Paris, EPA, 2012, p. 11.
PH. THÉRY, « Conclusions», in Financement de contentieux par un tiers. Third Party Litigation Funding, op. cit., p. 178.
Voy. S. Menétrey, « L’incidence du litigation funding devant les juridictions nationales», in Financement de contentieux par un tiers. Third Party Litigation Funding, op. cit., p. 75.
B.T. Fitzpatrick, « Can and Should the New Third-Party Litigation Financing Come to Class Actions?», Theoretical Inquiries in Law, 2018, p. 109;
Australian Law Reform Commission, Class Action Proceedings and Third-Party Litigation Funding, Discussion Paper No 85 (2018).
M. LEGG & L. TRAVERS, « Necessity is the Mother of Invention: the Adoption of TPLF and the Closed Class in Australian Class Actions», Comm. L. World Rev., 2009, vol. 48, p. 245.
http://www.imf.com.au
VOY. B. DEFFAINS & C. DESRIEUX, « Les enjeux économiques du financement des contentieux par des tiers», in Financement de contentieux par un tiers. Third Party Litigation Funding, op. cit., p. 27.
D.S. ABRAMS & D.L. CHEN, « A Market for Justice: A First Empirical Look at Third Party Litigation Funding», U. PA. J. BUS. L., 2013, vol. 15, p. 1075.
M. LEGG & L. TRAVERS, « Necessity is the Mother of Invention: the Adoption of TPLF and the Closed Class in Australian Class Actions», op. cit., p. 245.
VOY. D. HENSLER, « Third-Party Financing of Class Action Litigation in the United States: Will the Sky Fall ?», DePaul L.R., 2014, vol. 63, p. 1101, spéc. p. 1119.
Depuis Campbells Cash and Carry Pty Ltd. v. Fostif Pty Ltd. (2006) 229 CLR 386.
VOY. M. LEGG, « Institutional Investors and Shareholder Class Actions: The Law and Economics of Participation», Australian Law Journal, 2007, vol. 81, p. 478.
M. LEGG & L. TRAVERS, « Necessity is the Mother of Invention: the Adoption of TPLF and the Closed Class in Australian Class Actions», op. cit., p. 258.
V. MORABITO, « An Empirical Study of Australia’s Class Action Regimes. Fourth Report: Facts and Figures on Twenty-Four Years of Class Actions in Australia», op. cit., p. 3.
M. LEGG & L. TRAVERS, « Necessity is the Mother of Invention: the Adoption of TPLF and the Closed Class in Australian Class Actions», op. cit., p. 259.
Money Max Int Pty Ltd (Trustee) v. QBE Insurance Group Limited [2016] FCAFC 148, accessible en ligne .
V. Morabito, « An Empirical Study of Australia’s Class Action Regimes. Fourth Report: Facts and Figures on Twenty-Four Years of Class Actions in Australia», op. cit., p. 3.
Voy. IMF (Australia) Ltd. 2009, Annual Report (2009), accessible en ligne https://www.imf.com.au/docs/default-source/site-documents/annualreport2009.
J. P. ROSSOS, « Access to Justice: Using Third Party Financing to Fulfill the Promise of Class Action Litigation», Can. Class Action Rev., 2008, vol. 5, p. 77;
A. DANTOWITZ, « Commercial Third Party Funding of Class Actions in Ontario», 2012, http://www.stockwoods.ca/wp-content/ uploads/2012/01/Third_Party_Funding-Final.pdf;
C. Wright, « Third-Party Funding for Class Actions, and Control over the Litigation», Canadian Business Law Journal, 2014, vol. 55, p. 165;
M. TREBILCOCK, « Economic Assessment of Third-Party Litigation Funding of Ontario Class Actions», Canadian Business Law Journal, 2014, vol. 55, p. 54;
C. PICHÉ, « Le financement public et privé de l’action collective québécoise», Revue Concurrences, 2014, vol. 3, p. 17.
Gbarabe v. Chevron Corp., No. 14-CV-173, décision accessible en ligne http://www.workplaceclassaction.com/wp-content/uploads/sites/214/2016/08/Gbarabe-v-Chevron-Grant-Motion-to-Compel-2.pdf.
V. sahani, « Judging Third-Party Funding», UCLA L. Rev., 2016, vol. 63, p. 388.
Voy. M. steinitz, « Whose Claim Is This Anyway? Third-Party Litigation Funding», Minnesota L. Rev., 2011, p. 1330.
VOY. C. VELJANOVSKI, « Third Party Litigation Funding in Europe», J.L. Econ. & Pol’y, 2011-2012, vol. 8, p. 405;
O. COJO MANUEL, « Third-Party Litigation Funding: Current State of Affairs and Prospects for its Further Development in Spain», European Review of Private Law, 2014, p. 439;
G. MARCO SOLAS, « Alternative Litigation Funding and the Italian Perspective», European Review of Private Law, 2016, p. 253
; A. STADLER, « Funding of Mass Claims in Germany: “Caught Between a Rock and a Hard Place”», in Litigation, Costs, Funding and Behaviour. Implications for the Law, Routledge, 2017.
I. TZANKOVA, « Funding of Mass Disputes: Lessons from the Netherlands», J.L. Econ. & Pol’y, 2011-2012, vol. 8, p. 549.
VOY. I. TZANKOVA, « Funding of Mass Disputes: Lessons from the Netherlands», op. cit., pp . 577-579.
VOY. H. BIELESZ & P. KREPIL, « Austria», The Class Action Law Review, 2018, p. 12.
Voy. https://www.dieselklage.at/who-we-are.
D. BOSCO, « Le financement par les tiers de l’action collective: l’exemple de l’Union européenne», Bulletin de droit économique, 2015, 1/2, p. 4.
Voy. http://www.carteldamageclaims.com.
Voy. P.-H. Conac, « Vers des class actions en matière boursière en Europe et en France ?», Rev. sociétés, 2018, p. 472.
J. MUCCHIELLI, « Le financement participatif des actions en justice», Dalloz Actualité, 15 septembre 2014.
