Paper published in a book (Scientific congresses, symposiums and conference proceedings)
Representation Equivalences among Argumentation Frameworks
Liao, Beishui; van der Torre, Leon
2018In Computational Models of Argument
Peer reviewed
 

Files


Full Text
main.pdf
Author preprint (117.25 kB)
Download

All documents in ORBilu are protected by a user license.

Send to



Details



Keywords :
Formal argumentation; abstract argumentation semantics; representation equivalence
Abstract :
[en] In Dung’s abstract argumentation theory, an extension can be represented by subsets of it in the sense that from each of these subsets, the extension can be obtained again by iteratively applying the characteristic function. Such so-called regular representations can be used to differentiate argumentation frameworks having the same extensions. In this paper we provide a full characterization of relations between seven different types of representation equivalence.
Disciplines :
Computer science
Author, co-author :
Liao, Beishui;  Zhejiang University
van der Torre, Leon ;  University of Luxembourg > Faculty of Science, Technology and Communication (FSTC) > Computer Science and Communications Research Unit (CSC)
External co-authors :
yes
Language :
English
Title :
Representation Equivalences among Argumentation Frameworks
Publication date :
2018
Event name :
Seventh International Conference on Computational Models of Argument
Event date :
12-14/09/2018
Main work title :
Computational Models of Argument
Publisher :
IOS Press
Peer reviewed :
Peer reviewed
Available on ORBilu :
since 20 August 2018

Statistics


Number of views
67 (3 by Unilu)
Number of downloads
43 (5 by Unilu)

Scopus citations®
 
2
Scopus citations®
without self-citations
1

Bibliography


Similar publications



Contact ORBilu