Achilleas, P., French remote sensing law, The Journal of Space Law, 34 (2008) 1.
Agreement on the Rescue of Astronauts, the Return of Astronauts and the Return of Objects Launched into Outer Space (the “Rescue Agreement”) (entered into force on December 3, 1968).
Alvarado, S.C., The analysis of existing international space cooperation initiatives for UNESCO’s World Heritage Sites, IAC-10.E3.1A.14 (2010).
Aoki, S., Japanese law and regulations concerning remote sensing activities, The Journal of Space Law, 36 (2010) 335.
Beets, J., The international charter on space and major disasters and international disaster law: The need for collaboration and coordination, Air & Space Lawyer, 22/4 (2010) 12-15.
Birisbe, T., Outer space activities and intellectual property protection in Nigeria, The Journal of Space Law, 32 (2006) 229.
Bissonette v. Haig, 776 F.2d 1384 (1985).
Blount, P.J., Limits on space weapons: Incorporating the law of war into the Corpus Juris Spatialis, in Proceedings of the 51st Colloquium on the Law of Outer Space (AIAA 2009).
Blount, P.J., Developments in space security and their legal implications, Law/Technology, 44/2 (2011) 18.
Blount, P.J., Renovating space: The future of international space law, Denver Journal of International Law and Policy 40(2012) 515-686.
Blount, PJ. and J. Fussell, Musical counter narratives: Space, skepticism, and religion in American music, in AIAA 52nd Aerospace Sciences Meeting (January 2014), National Harbor, MD.
Brocklesby v. U.S. 767 F.2d 1288 (9th Cir. 1985).
Carpanelli, E. and B. Cohen, A legal assessment of the 1996 declaration on space benefits on the occasion of its fifteenth anniversary, The Journal of Space Law, 38 (2012) 1.
Carpanelli, E. and M.K. Force, The protection of the earth natural environment through space activities: A general overview of some legal issues, in Proceedings of the International Institute of Space Law, The Hague, the Netherlands: Eleven (2011), p. 31.
Carter, J., Remarks at the congressional space medal of honor awards ceremony, Kennedy space Center, FL, Weekly Compilation of Presidential Documents, 14(40) (October 8, 1978) 1684.
CBERS Data Policy, The Journal of Space Law, 31 (2005) 281.
Charter on Cooperation to Achieve the Coordinated Use of Space Facilities in the Event of Natural or Technological Disasters Rev. 3 (April 25, 2000), http://www.disasterscharter.org/web/charter/charter. Accessed February 22, 2014.
Chen, B.X., iPhone tracks your every move, and there’s a map for that, WIred (April 20, 2011), http://www.wired.com/gadget-lab/2011/04/iphone-tracks/. Accessed February 22, 2014.
Chinese Law: Registration, launching and licensing space objects, The Journal of Space Law, 33 (2007) 437.
Cho, G., Privacy and EO: An overview of legal issues, in R. Purdy and D. Leung (eds.), Evidence from Earth Observation Satellites, Leiden, the Netherlands: Martinus Nijhoff Publishers (2013), p. 259.
Clark, D.C. and S. Landau, Untangling attribution, in Committee on Deterring Cyberattacks, Proceedings of a Workshop on Deterring Cyberattacks: Informing Strategies and Developing Options for U.S. Policy, Washington, DC: National Academies Press (2010), p. 25.
Convention on International Liability for Damage Caused by Space Objects (the “Liability Convention”) (entered into force on September 1, 1972).
Convention on Registration of Objects Launched into Outer Space (the “Registration Convention”) (entered into force on September 15, 1976).
Croi, W., F.-M. Foeteler, and H. Linke, Introducing digital signatures and time-stamps in the EO data processing chain, in R. Purdy and D. Leung (eds.), Evidence from Earth Observation Satellites, Leiden, the Netherlands: Martinus Nijhoff Publishers (2013), p. 379.
Cromer, J.D., How on earth terrestrial laws can protect geospatial data, The Journal of Space Law, 32 (2006) 253.
Crook, J., Corporate Sovereign symbiosis: Wilson v. ImageSat International, Shareholders’ actions, and the dualistic nature of state-owned corporations, The Journal of Space Law, 33 (2007) 411.
Dembling, P.G. and D.M. Arons, The evolution of the outer space treaty, Journal of Air Law & Commerce, 33 (1967) 419-456.
Diederiks-Verschoor, I.H.Ph., An Introduction to Space Law, The Hague, the Netherlands: Kluwer (1999).
Dighe, K., T. Mikolop, R.W. Mushal, and D. O’Connell, The use of satellite imagery in environmental crimes prosecutions in the United States: A developing area, in R. Purdy and D. Leung (eds.), Evidence from Earth Observation Satellites, Leiden, the Netherlands: Martinus Nijhoff Publishers (2013), p. 65.
Doldirina, C., The impact of copyright protection and public sector information regulations on the availability of remote sensing data, in R. Purdy and D. Leung (eds.), Evidence from Earth Observation Satellites, Leiden, the Netherlands: Martinus Nijhoff Publishers (2013), p. 293.
Escolar, G.G., The use of EO data as evidence in the courts of Singapore, in R. Purdy and D. Leung (eds.), Evidence from Earth Observation Satellites, Leiden, the Netherlands: Martinus Nijhoff Publishers (2013), p. 93.
EU Directive 2003/4/EC, On public access to environmental information and repealing Council Directive 90/313/EEC (January 28, 2003).
Eyes on Darfur, http://www.eyesondarfur.org/ (last visited February 22, 2014).
Ferguson, Y.H. and R.W. Mansbach, Globalization: The Return of Borders to a Borderless World?, London, U.K.: Routledge (2012).
Ferreira, H.S. and G. Camara, Current status and recent developments in Brazilian remote sensing law, The Journal of Space Law, 34 (2008) 11.
Filho, J.M. and A.F. dos Santos, Chinese-Brazilian accord on distribution of CBERS products, The Journal of Space Law, 31 (2005) 271.
Foresman, S., Google faces 50 million lawsuit over Android location tracking, Ars Technica (April 30, 2011), http://arstechnica.com/tech-policy/2011/04/google-faces-50-million-lawsuit-over-android-location-tracking/. Accessed February 22, 2014.
Frizell, S., Tinder security flaw exposed users’ locations, Time (February 19, 2014), http://techland.time.com/2014/02/19/tinder-app-user-location-security-flaw/. Accessed February 22, 2014.
Froehlich, A., Space related data: From justice to development, in Proceedings of the International Institute of Space Law, The Hague, the Netherlands: Eleven (2011), p. 221.
Gabrynowicz, J.I., Earth observation: The view from the ground up, Space Policy (August 1997), 229.
Gabrynowicz, J.I., Defining data availability for commercial remote sensing systems under United States federal law, Annals of Air and Space Law, 23 (1999) 93.
Gabrynowicz, J.I. (ed.), The UN Principles Relating to Remote Sensing of the Earth from Space: A Legislative History— Interviews of Members of the United States Delegation, University, MS: National Center for Remote Sensing and Space Law (2002).
Gabrynowicz, J.I., Space law: Its cold war origins and challenges in the era of globalization, Suffolk University Law Review, 37 (2004) 1043.
Gabrynowicz, J.I., The perils of Landsat from grassroots to globalization: A comprehensive review of US remote sensing law with a few thoughts for the future, Chicago Journal of International Law, 6/1 (2005) 45.
Gabrynowicz, J.I., The International space treaty regime in the era of globalization, Ad Astra (Fall 2005), 30.
Gabrynowicz, J.I., The Land Remote Sensing Laws and Policies of National Governments: A Global Survey, University, MS: National Center for Remote Sensing, Air, and Space Law(2007).
Gannes, L., GPS App Strava sued over cyclist’s death, All Things D (June 19, 2012), http://allthingsd.com/20120619/gps-app-strava-sued-over-cyclists-death/.
Gillon, T., Regulating remote sensing space systems in Canada— New Legislation for a New Era, The Journal of Space Law, 34 (2008) 19.
Google Faces Lawsuits over Gmail, Street View privacy, CBC News (October 2, 2013), http://www.cbc.ca/news/busi-ness/google-faces-lawsuits-over-gmail-street-view-pri-vacy-1.1876594.
Goulevitch, B., Ten years of using earth observation data in support of Queensland’s vegetation management framework, in R. Purdy and D. Leung (eds.), Evidence from Earth Observation Satellites, Leiden, the Netherlands: Martinus Nijhoff Publishers (2013), p. 113.
Graham, J.F. and J.I. Gabrynowicz (eds.), Landsat 7: Past Present and Future, University, MS: National Remote Sensing and Space Law Center (2002a).
Graham, J.F. and J.I. Gabrynowicz, The Remote Sensing Industry: A CEO Forum, University, MS: National Remote Sensing and Space Law Center (2002b).
Gunasekara, S.G., The March of science: Fourth Amendment implications on remote sensing in criminal law, The Journal of Space Law, 36 (2010) 115.
Hadhazy, A., Bad directions from Google maps lead to lawsuit, Tech News Daily (June 3, 2010), http://www.technewsdaily.com/556-bad-directions-from-google-maps-lead-to-law-suit.html. Accessed February 22, 2014.
Harris, R., Current status and recent development in UK and European remote sensing law and policy, The Journal of Space Law, 34 (2008) 33.
Harris, R., Science, policy, and evidence in EO, in R. Purdy and D. Leung (eds.), Evidence from Earth Observation Satellites, Leiden, the Netherlands: Martinus Nijhoff Publishers(2013), p. 43.
Harrison, R.G., Space and Verification, Vol. 1: Policy Implications, USAFA, CO: Eisenhower Center for Space and Defense Studies (2011).
Harvey, D., A Brief History of Neoliberalism, Oxford, U.K.: Oxford University Press (2005).
International Law Commission, Draft articles on Responsibility of States for Internationally Wrongful Acts, with commentaries (2001).
Ito, A., Improvement to the legal regime for the effective use of satellite remote sensing data for disaster management and protection of the environment, The Journal of Space Law, 34 (2008) 45.
Jackson, S.M., Cultural lag and the international law of remote sensing, Brooklyn Journal of International Law, 23 (1997) 853.
Jahku, R., International law governing the acquisition and dissemination of satellite imagery, Journal of Space Law, 29 (2003) 65.
John, O.N., E. Ezekiel, and S.O. Mohammed, Legal regime of remote sensing and geographic information systems in Nigeria, in Proceedings of the International Institute of Space Law, The Hague, the Netherlands: Eleven (2011), p. 260.
Kopal, V., The role of United Nations declarations of principles in the progressive development of space law, The Journal of Space Law, 16 (1988) 5.
Kuriyama, I., Environmental monitoring cooperation paves the way for common rules on remote sensing, The Journal of Space Law, 36 (2010) 567.
Lachs, M., The Law of Outer Space: An Experience in Contemporary Law-Making, Leiden, the Netherlands: Martinus Nijhoff (1972, 2010).
Lee, J.G., Remote sensing issues as they relate to Korea, The Journal of Space Law, 36 (2010) 415.
Licensing of Private Remote Sensing Systems, 15 CFR 960 (2013).
Ling, Y., Remote sensing data distribution and application in the environmental protection, disaster prevention, and urban planning in China, The Journal of Space Law, 36(2010) 435.
Listner, M., Iridium 33 and Cosmos 2251 three years later: Where are we now? The Space Review (February 13, 2012), http://www.thespacereview.com/article/2023/!. Accessed February 22, 2014.
Lyall, F. and P.B Larsen, Space Law: A Treatise, Aldershot, U.K.: Ashgate (2013).
Macauley, E.D., The use of EO technologies in court by the office of the prosecutor of the international criminal court, in R. Purdy and D. Leung (eds.), Evidence from Earth Observation Satellites, Leiden, the Netherlands: Martinus Nijhoff Publishers (2013), p. 217.
Mann, B., First license issued under Canada’s remote sensing satellite legislation, The Journal of Space Law, 34 (2008) 67.
Marchisio, S., The evolutionary stages of the legal subcommittee of the United Nations Committee on the peaceful uses of outer space (COPUOS), The Journal of Space Law, 31 (2005) 219.
Mayence, J.-F., Belgian legal framework for earth observation activities, The Journal of Space Law, 34 (2008) 89.
Mejia-Kaiser, M., Copyright claims for Meteosat and Landsat images under court challenge, The Journal of Space Law, 32(2006) 293.
Mosteshar, S., EO in the European Union: Legal considerations, in R. Purdy and D. Leung (eds.), Evidence from Earth Observation Satellites, Leiden, the Netherlands: Martinus Nijhoff Publishers (2013), p. 147.
NASA Landsat Science, The numbers behind Landsat, http://landsat.gsfc.nasa.gov/?page_id=9 (last visited February 22, 2014).
Onoda, M., Satellite Earth Observation As ‘Systematic Observation’ in multilateral environmental treaties, The Journal of Space Law, 31 (2005) 339.
Oprong, A.A. and V. Rwehumbiza, A glance at the earth observation policies and regulations and the impact on developing countries: Focusing on the African continent, in Proceedings of the International Institute of Space Law (2011), p. 251.
Petras, C.M., ‘Eyes’ on freedom—A view of the law governing military uses of satellite reconnaissance in U.S. Homeland defense, The Journal of Space Law, 31 (2005) 81.
Remote Sensing Space Systems Act (S.C. 2005, c. 45).
Reynolds, G.H. and R.P. Merges, Outer Space: Problems of Law and Policy, Boulder, CO: Westview Press (1997).
Richelson, J.T., America’s Space Sentinels: DSP Satellites and National Security, Lawrence, KA: University Press of Kansas(1999).
Rychlak, R.J., J.I. Gabrynowicz, and R. Crowsey, Legal certification of digital data: The earth resources observation and science data center project, The Journal of Space Law, 33 (2007) 195.
Satellite Data Security Act, The Journal of Space Law, 34 (2008) 115.
Satellite Sentinel Project, http://www.satsentinel.org/ (last visited February 22, 2014).
Schmidt-Tedd, B. and M. Kroyman, Current status and recent developments in German remote sensing law, The Journal of Space Law, 34 (2008) 97.
Schrogl, K.-U. and N. Hedman, The U.N. General Assembly Resolution 62/102 of 17 December 2007 on ‘Recommendations on Enhancing the Practice of States and International Intergovernmental Organizations in Registering Space Objects,’ The Journal of Space Law, 34(2008) 141.
Secunda, P.M., A mosquito in the ointment: Adverse HIPPAA implications for health-related remote sensing research and a ‘Reasonable’ Solution, The Journal of Space Law, 30(2004) 251.
Sekhula, P.P., The right to remote sense data: Impact of multilateral cooperation on international space law [sic], in Proceedings of the International Institute of Space Law, The Hague, the Netherlands: Eleven (2011), p. 228.
Sentinel Asia, Sentinel Asia: Disaster management support system in the Asia-Pacific Region, http://www.aprsaf.org/initiatives/sentinel_asia/pdf/Sentinel-Asia.pdf (last visited February 22, 2014).
Shipman, A., Authentification of images, in R. Purdy and D. Leung (eds.), Evidence from Earth Observation Satellites, Leiden, the Netherlands: Martinus Nijhoff Publishers(2013), p. 359.
Tarikhi, P., Mahdasht satellite receiving station verging into a space center, Res Communis (October 13, 2008), http://rescommunis.olemiss.edu/2008/10/13/guest-blogger-par-viz-tarikhi-mahdasht-satellite-receiving-station-verging-into-a-space-center/. Accessed February 22, 2014.
Terekov, A., UN general assembly resolutions and outer space law, in Proceedings of the International Institute of Space Law(1997), p. 97.
Treaty between the United States of America and the Russian Federation on Measures for the Further Reduction and Limitation of Strategic Offensive Arms (signed April 10, 2010).
Treaty on Principles Governing the Activities of States in the Exploration and Use of Outer Space, including the Moon and Other Celestial Bodies (the “Outer Space Treaty”) (entered into force on October 10, 1967).
Uhlir, P.F., R.S. Chen, J.I. Gabrynowicz, and K. Janssen, Toward implementation of the global earth observation system of systems data sharing principles, The Journal of Space Law, 35 (2009) 201.
UN Charter (1945).
UNGA Meeting Record no. A/41/PV.95 (December 3, 1986).
UNGA Res. 41/65, Principles relating to remote sensing of the earth from outer space (December 3, 1986).
UNGA Res. 51/122, The Declaration on International Cooperation in the Exploration and Use of Outer Space for the Benefit and in the Interest of All States, Taking into Particular Account the Needs of Developing Countries (December 13, 1996).
UNGA Res. 60/1,2005 World Summit Outcome (October 24, 2005).
UNGA Res. 62/102, Recommendations on Enhancing the Practice of States and International Intergovernmental Organizations in Registering Space Objects (December 17, 2007).
UNOOSA, About UN-SPIDER, http://www.unoosa.org/oosa/en/unspider/index.html (last visited February 22, 2014).
United Nations High Commission on Human RIghts, Report of the commission of inquiry on human rights in the Democratic People’s Republic of Korea, A/HRC/25/63 (February 17, 2014).
U.S. Constitution.
U.S. v. Jones, No. 10-1259, Concurring Opinion of Justice Sotomayor (January 23, 2012).
U.S. v. Kahn, 35 F.3d 426 (1994).
U.S. v. Rasheed, 802 F.Supp. 312 (1992).
U.S. v. Red Feather, 392 F.Supp. (1975)
U.S. v. Yunis, 924 F.2d 1086 (1991).
Vasquez, F.R. and S.C. Lara, What lawyers need to know about science to effectively make and address laws for remote sensing and environmental monitoring, The Journal of Space Law, 36 (2010) 365.
Vasquez, M.S., Cosmic International Law, Detroit, MI: Wayne State University Press (1965), p. 164.
Vereschetin, V.S. and G.M. Danilenko, Custom as a source of international law of outer space, The Journal of Space Law, 13 (1985) 22.
von der Dunk, F.G., Outer space law principles and privacy, in R. Purdy and D. Leung (eds.), Evidence from Earth Observation Satellites, Leiden, the Netherlands: Martinus Nijhoff Publishers (2013), p. 243.
Williams, M., Satellite evidence in international institutions, in R. Purdy and D. Leung (eds.), Evidence from Earth Observation Satellites, Leiden, the Netherlands: Martinus Nijhoff Publishers (2013), p. 195.
Wright, M., The use of remote sensing evidence at trial in the United States—One State Court Judge’s observations, in R. Purdy and D. Leung (eds.), Evidence from Earth Observation Satellites, Leiden, the Netherlands: Martinus Nijhoff Publishers (2013), p. 313.
Wrynn v. U.S., 200 F.Supp. 457 (1961).
Zhao, Y., Regulation of remote sensing activities in Hong Kong: Privacy, access, security, copyright and the case of Google, The Journal of Space Law, 36 (2010) 547.
