Reference : Psychologists and neoliberal school reforms: Multi-faceted problems calling for multi... |
Scientific journals : Article | |||
Social & behavioral sciences, psychology : Education & instruction Social & behavioral sciences, psychology : Multidisciplinary, general & others | |||
Educational Sciences | |||
http://hdl.handle.net/10993/35207 | |||
Psychologists and neoliberal school reforms: Multi-faceted problems calling for multi-faceted interventions | |
English | |
Boll, Thomas ![]() | |
2018 | |
Integrative Psychological and Behavioral Science | |
Springer | |
52 | |
3 | |
425-437 | |
Yes (verified by ORBilu) | |
International | |
1932-4502 | |
1936-3567 | |
[en] school reforms ; neoliberalism ; ideology ; educational objectives ; educational quality ; school psychology ; self-regulated learning ; competence-oriented teaching ; PISA ; psychological development ; developmental tasks ; intentional self-development ; political participation ; interdisciplinary research ; critical psychology ; cultural psychology | |
[en] This paper extends on six aspects of an article on neoliberal school reforms,
their possible influences on schools and school psychologists, and options for dealing with these challenges (Szulevicz, Integrative Psychological and Behavioral Sciences 2018). First, the reductions implied in the neoliberal view of the student as homo economicus and of an ideal student as self-regulated learner are described and alternative views of the student as a person (e.g., homo moralis) and of the ideal student (e.g., as intentional self-developer) are presented. Secondly, several promoting and inhibiting influences on neoliberal school reforms are discussed: competence-based school education, output-oriented school governance, and standardized school performance testing on the one hand, and critical discourses about these phenomena on the other. Third, attention is directed towards impending disadvantages of the aforementioned reforms (e.g., insufficient preparation of students for the fullness of life). Fourth, goals for interventions are discussed (e.g., reducing neoliberal influences on schools, creating an awareness of the disadvantages of neoliberal reforms, forming coalitions to promote alternatives to these reforms). Fifth, some intervention approaches for reaching these goals are considered with special emphasis on different system levels and stakeholders at which these interventions may be targeted (e.g., education policy makers, teachers and parents associations). Sixth, evaluations of the interventions are called for to monitor their effects and to refine the guiding goals, problem analyses, and strategies. In closing, some transferable principles of the preceding approach are highlighted that could be used to better understand and manage other educational problems as well. | |
Integrative Research Unit: Social and Individual Development (INSIDE) > Institute for Research on Generations and Family: Research Group on Aging and Life Span Development | |
Researchers ; Professionals ; Students ; General public | |
http://hdl.handle.net/10993/35207 | |
10.1007/s12124-018-9419-9 | |
https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007%2Fs12124-018-9419-9 |
File(s) associated to this reference | ||||||||||||||
Fulltext file(s):
| ||||||||||||||
All documents in ORBilu are protected by a user license.