Reference : Converging Terroir Typicity for Political Usage and Didactic Normativity. The Metonym...
Parts of books : Contribution to collective works
Social & behavioral sciences, psychology : Sociology & social sciences
Social & behavioral sciences, psychology : Anthropology
Arts & humanities : Multidisciplinary, general & others
Sustainable Development
http://hdl.handle.net/10993/33924
Converging Terroir Typicity for Political Usage and Didactic Normativity. The Metonymical Institutionalization of Wine in Luxembourg
English
Reckinger, Rachel mailto [University of Luxembourg > Faculty of Language and Literature, Humanities, Arts and Education (FLSHASE) > Identités, Politiques, Sociétés, Espaces (IPSE) >]
2019
A History of Wine in Europe, 19th to 20th Century: Volume II: Markets, Trade and the Regulation of Quality
Conca Messina, Silvia A.
Le Bras, Stéphane
Tedeschi, Paolo
Vaquero Piñeiro, Manuel
Palgrave Macmilan
213-232
Yes
London
[en] geographic origin of wines ; political usage ; didactic normativity ; wine production ; wine consumption ; terroir typicity ; political symbolism ; political regulations ; scientific knowledge ; media dissemination
[en] The current aestheticization and hyper-differentiation of wines in terms of their region of origin is part of a broader historical process of rationalization. Three vectors have since the 19th century played a key role in the forming of oenophilia: these are regulation by the state, scientific consolidation and dissemination via the media – whose convergent effects have contributed in constructing an object with particular characteristics. This seemingly homogenous object – whose plural even conflictual construction is hardly visible – requires specific consideration also in terms of its consumption: the oenophile gesture, i.e. a reflective, contemplative and comparative attitude, mixing aesthetic and analytical registers, in order to rationalize the pleasure of wine. This cultural figure draws on the normativity of these three vectors, all of which have underscored the importance of the geographical provenance of wine in order to use it depending on their respective positions.

What political usage and didactic normativity regarding the subject of wine have in common is the reference to its 'origin'. In the economic-juridical and political-symbolic manifestations of the vector of state regulation, this 'origin' refers to a cultural region of national sovereignty which is constructed in a metonymic way as the native region of national specificity. In the didactic realizations of oenophile normativity, emerging from the vector of scientific consolidation, this 'origin' refers in an epistemic way to parcellated vineyard regions which are constructed as terroirs by the interaction of traditional, man-made viticultural techniques and the natural conditions, holding sensory potentials whose sub-text is of a moral order. Wine’s 'origin' is the argument necessary to convey an impression of absoluteness: in the case of politics it is the symbolic uniqueness of the nationality in question, in the case of oenophile normativity, what is aimed for is the sensory and moral uniqueness of every wine whose intention of production was an "expression of the terroir".
Researchers ; Professionals ; Students ; General public
http://hdl.handle.net/10993/33924
10.1007/978-3-030-27794-9
https://www.palgrave.com/gp/book/9783030277932

There is no file associated with this reference.

Bookmark and Share SFX Query

All documents in ORBilu are protected by a user license.