Pas de texte intégral
Article (Périodiques scientifiques)
Attentional bias towards pain-related information diminishes the efficacy of distraction.
VAN RYCKEGHEM, Dimitri; Crombez, Geert; Van Hulle, Lore et al.
2012In Pain, 153 (12), p. 2345-51
Peer reviewed vérifié par ORBi
 

Documents


Texte intégral
Aucun document disponible.

Envoyer vers



Détails



Mots-clés :
Adolescent; Attention; Cues; Female; Humans; Male; Pain/physiopathology; Perceptual Masking
Résumé :
[en] Distraction is a strategy that is commonly used to cope with pain. Results concerning the efficacy of distraction from both experimental and clinical studies are variable, however, and indicate that its efficacy may depend on particular circumstances. Several models propose that distraction may be less effective for people who display a large attentional bias towards pain-related information. This hypothesis was tested in an experimental context with 53 pain-free volunteers. First, attentional bias towards cues signalling the occurrence of pain (electrocutaneous stimuli) and towards words describing the sensory experience of this painful stimulus was independently assessed by means of 2 behavioural paradigms (respectively, spatial cueing task and dot-probe task). This was followed by a subsequent distraction task during which the efficacy of distraction, by directing attention away from the electrocutaneous stimuli, was tested. In addition, state-trait anxiety, catastrophic thinking, and initial pain intensity were measured. Results indicated that people who display a large attentional bias towards predictive cues of pain or who initially experience the pain as more painful benefit less from distraction on a subsequent test. No effects were found between attentional bias towards pain words, state-trait anxiety, catastrophic thinking, and the efficacy of distraction. Current findings suggest that distraction should not be used as a 'one size fits all' method to control pain, but only under more specific conditions.
Disciplines :
Psychologie cognitive & théorique
Auteur, co-auteur :
VAN RYCKEGHEM, Dimitri ;  Ghent University > Experimental-Clinical and Health psychology
Crombez, Geert
Van Hulle, Lore
Van Damme, Stefaan
Co-auteurs externes :
yes
Langue du document :
Anglais
Titre :
Attentional bias towards pain-related information diminishes the efficacy of distraction.
Date de publication/diffusion :
2012
Titre du périodique :
Pain
ISSN :
0304-3959
eISSN :
1872-6623
Maison d'édition :
Elsevier, Pays-Bas
Volume/Tome :
153
Fascicule/Saison :
12
Pagination :
2345-51
Peer reviewed :
Peer reviewed vérifié par ORBi
Commentaire :
Copyright (c) 2012 International Association for the Study of Pain. Published by Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.
Disponible sur ORBilu :
depuis le 25 juin 2017

Statistiques


Nombre de vues
102 (dont 1 Unilu)
Nombre de téléchargements
0 (dont 0 Unilu)

citations Scopus®
 
45
citations Scopus®
sans auto-citations
27
OpenCitations
 
40
citations OpenAlex
 
55
citations WoS
 
41

Bibliographie


Publications similaires



Contacter ORBilu