[en] The level of industry-academia collaboration (IAC) in software engineering in general and in software testing in particular is quite low. Many researchers and practitioners are not collaborating with the “other side” to solve industrial problems. To shed light on the above issue and to characterize precisely what industry wants from academia in software testing, we solicited practitioners’ opinions on their challenges in different testing activities and also the particularly relevant topics that they want the research community to work on. This short paper aims to draw the community’s attention to the important issue of strengthening IAC with the hope of more IAC in software testing in the areas of most importance to the industry.
Centre de recherche :
Interdisciplinary Centre for Security, Reliability and Trust (SnT) > Software Verification and Validation Lab (SVV Lab)
Disciplines :
Sciences informatiques
Auteur, co-auteur :
GAROUSI, Vahid ; University of Luxembourg > Interdisciplinary Centre for Security, Reliability and Trust (SNT)
Felderer, Michael
Kuhrmann, Marco
Herkiloğlu, Kadir
Co-auteurs externes :
yes
Langue du document :
Anglais
Titre :
What industry wants from academia in software testing? Hearing practitioners’ opinions
Date de publication/diffusion :
15 juin 2017
Nom de la manifestation :
International Conference on Evaluation and Assessment in Software Engineering (EASE)
Lieu de la manifestation :
Karlskrona, Suède
Date de la manifestation :
15-06-2017 to 16-06-2017
Sur invitation :
Oui
Manifestation à portée :
International
Titre de l'ouvrage principal :
Proceedings of International Conference on Evaluation and Assessment in Software Engineering (EASE)
P. Ammann and J. Ofutt. 2016. Introduction to Software Testing (2 ed.). Cambridge University Press.
S. Beecham, P. O'Leary, S. Baker, I. Richardson, and J. Noll. 2014. Making Software Engineering Research Relevant. Computer 47, 4 (Apr 2014), 80-83. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1109/MC.2014.92
L. Briand. 2012. Embracing the Engineering Side of Software Engineering. IEEE Software 29, 4 (July 2012), 96-96. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1109/MS.2012.86
V. Garousi, A. Coşkunçay, A. Betin-Can, and O. Demirörs. 2015. A survey of software engineering practices in Turkey. Journal of Systems and Software 108 (2015), 148-177. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jss.2015.06.036
V. Garousi, M. M. Eskandar, and K. Herkiloǧlu. 2016. Industry-academia collaborations in software testing: experience and success stories from Canada and Turkey. Software Quality Journal (2016), 1-53. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11219-016-9319-5
V. Garousi and M. Felderer. 2017. Living in two diferent worlds: A comparison of industry and academic focus areas in software testing. IEEE Software (in press) (2017).
V. Garousi, A. Mesbah, A. Betin-Can, and S. Mirshokraie. 2013. A systematic mapping study of web application testing. Information and Software Technology 55, 8 (2013), 1374-1396. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.infsof.2013.02.006
V. Garousi, K. Petersen, and B. Özkan. 2016. Challenges and Best Practices in Industry-academia Collaborations in Software Engineering. Information and Software Technology 79, C (Nov. 2016), 106-127. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.infsof.2016.07.006
V. Garousi and J. Zhi. 2013. A Survey of Software Testing Practices in Canada. Journal of Systems and Software 86, 5 (May 2013), 1354-1376. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jss.2012.12.051
R. L. Glass. 2006. Software Creativity 2.0. developer.∗ Books.
D. Graham, E. V. Veenendaal, and I. Evans. 2008. Cengage Learning. Cengage.
D. Lo, N. Nagappan, and T Zimmermann. 2015. How Practitioners Perceive the Relevance of Software Engineering Research. In 10th Joint Meeting on Foundations of Software Engineering (ESEC/FSE 2015). ACM, New York, NY, USA, 415-425. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1145/2786805.2786809
J. S. Molléri, K. Petersen, and E. Mendes. 2016. Survey Guidelines in Software Engineering: An Annotated Review. In 10th International Symposium on Empirical Software Engineering and Measurement (ESEM). ACM, New York, NY, USA, Article 58, 6 pages. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1145/2961111.2962619
D. M. Shaw and B. S. Elger. 2013. The relevance of relevance in research. Swiss Medical Weekly 143: w13792 (May 2013), 1-4.
D. I. K. Sjoeberg, J. E. Hannay, O. Hansen, V. B. Kampenes, A. Karahasanovic, N. K. Liborg, and A. C. Rekdal. 2005. A survey of controlled experiments in software engineering. IEEE Transactions on Software Engineering 31, 9 (Sept 2005), 733-753. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1109/TSE.2005.97
G. J. Smith, M. M. Schmidt, P. J. Edelen-Smith, and B. G. Cook. 2013. Pasteur's Quadrant as the Bridge Linking Rigor with Relevance. Exceptional Children 79, 2 (2013), 147-161.
A. Tang and R. Kazman. 2017. On the Worthiness of Software Engineering Research. Online: http://shidler.hawaii.edu/sites/shidler.hawaii.edu/fles/users/kazman/se-research-worthiness.pdf. (March 2017).
M. W. Tofel. 2016. Enhancing the Practical Relevance of Research. Production and Operations Management 25, 9 (2016), 1493-1505. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/poms.12558
R. v. Solingen and E. Berghout. 1999. The Goal/Question/Metric Method: A Practical Guide for Quality Improvement of Software Development. Mcgraw-Hill Professional.
C. Wohlin. 2013. Software Engineering Research under the Lamppost. In ICSOFT. SciTePress, IS-11.
C. Wohlin, P. Runeson, M. Höst, M. C. Ohlsson, B. Regnell, and A. Wesslén. 2012. Experimentation in Software Engineering. Springer.
