2016 • In Principles of Knowledge Representation and Reasoning: Proceedings of the Fifteenth International Conference, KR 2016, Cape Town, South Africa, April 25-29, 2016.
Doder, Dragan ; University of Luxembourg > Faculty of Science, Technology and Communication (FSTC) > Computer Science and Communications Research Unit (CSC)
Vesic, Srdjan
External co-authors :
yes
Language :
English
Title :
Ranking Arguments With Compensation-Based Semantics
Publication date :
2016
Event name :
15th International Conference on Principles of Knowledge Representation and Reasoning
Event date :
April 25-29, 2016
Main work title :
Principles of Knowledge Representation and Reasoning: Proceedings of the Fifteenth International Conference, KR 2016, Cape Town, South Africa, April 25-29, 2016.
Amgoud, L., and Ben-Naim, J. 2013. Ranking-based semantics for argumentation frameworks. In Proceedings of the 7th International Conference on Scalable Uncertainty Management (SUM'13), 134-147.
Baroni, P., and Giacomin, M. 2007. On principle-based evaluation of extension-based argumentation semantics. Artificial Intelligence 171(10-15):675-700.
Baroni, P.; Giacomin, M.; and Guida, G. 2005. Sccrecursiveness: a general schema for argumentation semantics. Artificial Intelligence Journal 168:162-210.
Besnard, P., and Hunter, A. 2001. A logic-based theory of deductive arguments. Artificial Intelligence 128(1-2):203-235.
Bonzon, E.; Maudet, N.; and Moretti, S. 2014. Coalitional games for abstract argumentation. In Computational Models of Argument - Proceedings of COMMA 2014, 161-172.
Brewka, G. 1989. Preferred subtheories: An extended logical framework for default reasoning. In Proc. of IJCAI-89, 1043-1048.
Burden, R., and Faires, J. 2001. Numerical analysis. USA: Brooks/Cole.
Cayrol, C., and Lagasquie-Schiex, M.-C. 2005. Graduality in Argumentation. Journal of Artificial Intelligence Research (JAIR) 23:245-297.
da Costa Pereira, C.; Tettamanzi, A.; and Villata, S. 2011. Changing one's mind: Erase or rewind? In IJCAI 2011, Proceedings of the 22nd International Joint Conference on Artificial Intelligence, 164-171.
Dubois, D.; Fargier, H.; and Bonnefon, J. 2008. On the qualitative comparison of decisions having positive and negative features. Journal of Artificial Intelligence Research 32:385-417.
Dung, P. M. 1995. On the Acceptability of Arguments and its Fundamental Role in Non-Monotonic Reasoning, Logic Programming and n-Person Games. AIJ 77:321-357.
Grossi, D., and Modgil, S. 2015. On the graded acceptability of arguments. In Proceedings of the 24th International Joint Conference on Artificial Intelligence, IJCAI'15, 868-874.
Leite, J., and Martins, J. 2011. Social abstract argumentation. In IJCAI 2011, Proceedings of the 22nd International Joint Conference on Artificial Intelligence, 2287-2292.
Li, K.; Liang, J.; and Xiao, T. 2005. Positive fixed points for nonlinear operators. Computers & Mathematics with Applications 50(1012):1569-1578.
Lucero, M. J. G.; Chesñevar, C. I.; and Simari, G. R. 2009. On the accrual of arguments in defeasible logic programming. In Proceedings of the 21st International Joint Conference on Artificial Intelligence IJCAI 2009, 804-809.
Matt, P., and Toni, F. 2008. A game-theoretic measure of argument strength for abstract argumentation. In Proceedings of 11th European Conference on Logics in Artificial Intelligence, JELIA'08, volume 5293 of Lecture Notes in Computer Science, 285-297. Springer.
Pu, F.; Luo, J.; Zhang, Y.; and Luo, G. 2014. Argument ranking with categoriser function. In Knowledge Science, Engineering and Management - 7th International Conference, KSEM 2014, Proceedings, 290-301.
Thimm, M., and Kern-Isberner, G. 2014. On controversiality of arguments and stratified labelings. In Computational Models of Argument - Proceedings of COMMA 2014, 413-420.
Thimm, M. 2012. A probabilistic semantics for abstract argumentation. In ECAI 2012 - 20th European Conference on Artificial Intelligence., 750-755.
