| Reference : Sustainable Spatial Development: Discourse Yes, Implementation Maybe |
| Scientific Presentations in Universities or Research Centers : Scientific presentation in universities or research centers | |||
| Social & behavioral sciences, psychology : Human geography & demography | |||
| http://hdl.handle.net/10993/2717 | |||
| Sustainable Spatial Development: Discourse Yes, Implementation Maybe | |
| English | |
Carr, Constance  [University of Luxembourg > Faculty of Language and Literature, Humanities, Arts and Education (FLSHASE) > Identités, Politiques, Sociétés, Espaces (IPSE) >] | |
| Jun-2012 | |
| International | |
| Regional Studies Association Research Network Ecological Regional Development | |
| June 2012 | |
| University of Luxembourg, Institute of Ecological and Regional Development, University of Hull | |
| LU | |
| [en] This paper presents progress achieved within the context of SUSTAINLUX (a research project funded by the Fonds National de la Recherche Luxembourg) and collaborative studies with the Worcester Polytechnic Institute.The research has aimed at critically examining the approach of sustainable development, in the context of Luxembourg’s urban and regional governance structures (Carr, Hesse, and Schulz 2010), that have transformed and rescaled (Brenner 1999) against tertiarization of the economy, and Europeanization of the political arena (Schulz 2009; Becker forthcoming) – processes that have had significant impact on the affordability of housing and infrastructure for mobility. To date, the research methods have included mapping the literature and actors relevant to the sustainable integrated development discourse in Luxembourg, performing interviews with practitioners in the field and exploring the role and limitations of this normative discourse in Luxembourg’s social spatial transformation (Carr 2011). Particular attention was paid to structures of decision-making and its relationship to the prevailing real estate market. In addition, comparative research was performed in collaboration with Prof. Krueger. This presentation will talk about the results and conceptualize them within the framework of policy mobility, as has been discussed in recent literature such as Ward (2006), Temenos and McCann (forthcoming), and González (2010). In this way, clear barriers to implementation to sustainable development goals can be identified.
References Becker, Tom. forthcoming. “Europäisierung der Städtepolitik ? Das Beispiel ‚CIPU’ in Luxemburg.” Europa Regional. Brenner, Neil. 1999. “Global as Reterritorialisation: The Re-Scaling of Urban Governance in the European Union.” Urban Studies 36(3):431-451. Carr, Constance. 2011. “Luxembourg Sustainable Spatial Development Policy: General Milestones and Circuits.” Laboratoire de Géographie et Aménagement du Territoire. Carr, Constance, Markus Hesse, and Christian Schulz. 2010. “Sustainable Spatial Development in Luxembourg (SUSTAINLUX).” Laboratoire de Géographie et Aménagement du Territoire. Retrieved (http://wwwen.uni.lu/research/flshase/laboratoire_de_geographie_et_amenagement_du_territoire/research/ongoing_projects). González, Sara. 2010. “Bilbao and Barcelona ‘in Motion’. How Urban Regeneration ‘Models’ Travel and Mutate in the Global Flows of Policy Tourism.” Urban Studies 1-22. Schulz, Christian. 2009. “Luxemburgs Wirtschaft.” Pp. 116-117 in Der Luxemburg Atlas du Luxembourg, edited by Patrick Bousch et al. Calbe: Hermann-Josef Emons Verlag. Temenos, Christina, and Eugene McCann. forthcoming. “The local politics of policy mobility: Learning, persuasion, and the production of a municipal sustainability fix.” Environment and Planning A. Ward, Kevin. 2006. “‘Policies in Motion’, Urban Management and State Restructuring: The Trans-Local Expansion of Business Improvement Districts.” International Journal of Urban and Regional Research 30(1):54-75. | |
| http://hdl.handle.net/10993/2717 |
There is no file associated with this reference.
All documents in ORBilu are protected by a user license.
