Abstract :
[en] There are two main traditions in defining a semantics for agent com-
munication languages, based either on mental attitudes or on social commitments.
In this paper, we translate both traditions in a different approach in which the di-
alogue state is represented by the beliefs and goals publicly attributed to the roles
played by the dialogue participants. On the one hand, this approach avoids the
problems of mentalistic semantics, such as the unverifiability of private mental
states. On the other hand, it allows use to reuse the logics and implementations
developed for FIPA compliant approaches.
Scopus citations®
without self-citations
0