argumentation and belief revision; argument on the beliefs of the addressee
Résumé :
[en] We study the interplay between argumentation and belief revision within the MAS framework. When an agent uses an argument to persuade another one, he must consider not only the proposition supported by the argument, but also the overall impact of the argument on the beliefs of the addressee. Different arguments lead to different belief revisions by the addressee. We propose an approach whereby the best argument is defined as the one which is both rational and the most appealing to the addressee.
Disciplines :
Sciences informatiques
Identifiants :
UNILU:UL-CONFERENCE-2009-213
Auteur, co-auteur :
Boella, Guido
Pereira, Célia Da Costa
Tettamanzi, Andrea
VAN DER TORRE, Leon ; University of Luxembourg > Faculty of Science, Technology and Communication (FSTC) > Computer Science and Communications Research Unit (CSC)
Co-auteurs externes :
yes
Langue du document :
Anglais
Titre :
Making Others Believe What They Want
Date de publication/diffusion :
2008
Nom de la manifestation :
Artificial Intelligence in Theory and Practice II, IFIP 20th World Computer Congress, TC 12: IFIP AI 2008 Stream
Date de la manifestation :
September 7-10 2008
Manifestation à portée :
International
Titre de l'ouvrage principal :
Artificial Intelligence in Theory and Practice II, IFIP 20th World Computer Congress, TC 12: IFIP AI 2008 Stream
G. Boella, C. da Costa Pereira, A. Tettamanzi, G. Pigozzi, and L. van del Torre. What you should believe: Obligations and beliefs. In Proceedings of KI07-Workshop on Dynamics of Knowledge and Belief, 2007.
G. Boella, C. D. C. Pereira, G. Pigozzi, A. Tettamanzi, and L. van der Torre. Choosing your beliefs. In G. Boella, L. W. N. van der Torre, and H. Verhagen, editors, Normative Multi-agent Systems, volume 07122 of Dagstuhl Seminar Proceedings. Internationales Begegnungs- und Forschungszentrum für Informatik (IBFI), Schloss Dagstuhl, Germany, 2007.
C. da Costa Pereira and A. Tettamanzi. Towards a framework for goal revision. In BNAIC 2006, pages 99-106. University of Namur, 2006.
P. M. Dung. On the acceptability of arguments and its fundamental role in nonmonotonic reasoning, logic programming, and n-person games. Artificial Intelligence, 77(2):321-358, 1995.
J. K. Galbraith. The Affluent Society. Houghton Mif.in, Boston, 1958.
S. O. Hansson. Logic of belief revision. In E. N. Zalta, editor, The Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy. Summer 2006.
A. Hunter. Making argumentation more believable. In AAAI 2004, pages 269-274, 2004.
F. Paglieri and C. Castelfranchi. Revising beliefs through arguments: Bridging the gap between argumentation and belief revision in MAS. In I. Rahwan, P. Moraitis, and C. Reed, editors, ArgMAS 2004, volume 3366 of Lecture Notes in Computer Science, pages 78-94. Springer, 2005.
N. D. Rotstein, A. J. Garcia, and G. R. Simari. From desires to intentions through dialectical analysis. In AAMAS '07, pages 1-3, New York, NY, USA, 2007. ACM.
