| Reference : Arguing about Trust in Multiagent Systems |
| Scientific congresses, symposiums and conference proceedings : Paper published in a journal | |||
| Engineering, computing & technology : Computer science | |||
| http://hdl.handle.net/10993/24940 | |||
| Arguing about Trust in Multiagent Systems | |
| English | |
| Villata, Serena [] | |
| Boella, Guido [University of Luxembourg > Faculty of Science, Technology and Communication (FSTC) > Computer Science and Communications Research Unit (CSC) >] | |
| Gabbay, Dov M. [University of Luxembourg > Faculty of Science, Technology and Communication (FSTC) > Computer Science and Communications Research Unit (CSC) >] | |
van der Torre, Leon  [University of Luxembourg > Faculty of Science, Technology and Communication (FSTC) > Computer Science and Communications Research Unit (CSC) >] | |
| 2010 | |
| Proceedings of the 11th Symposium on Artificial Intelligence of the Italian Association for Artificial Intelligence (AIIA'10) | |
| 236–243 | |
| Yes | |
| Yes | |
| International | |
| Proceedings of the 11th Symposium on Artificial Intelligence of the Italian Association for Artificial Intelligence (AIIA'10) | |
| 2010 | |
| [en] trust ; Multiagent Systems | |
| [en] Trust in multiagent systems is used for seeking to minimize
the uncertainty in the interactions among the agents. In this paper, we discuss how to use argumentation to reason about trust. Using the methodology of meta-argumentation, first we represent the source of the information from which the argument is constructed in the abstract argumentation framework capturing the fact that b is attacked because b is from a particular source s. We show how a source of information can be attacked if it is not evaluated as trustworthy. Second, we provide a fine grained representation of the trust relationships between the information sources in which trust concerns not only the sources but also the single arguments and attack relations the sources propose. Moreover, we represent the evidences in support of the arguments which are put forward by the information sources and the agents can express arguments by referring to other agents’ arguments. Meta-argumentation allows us not to extend Dung’s abstract argumentation framework by introducing trust and to reuse those principles and properties defined for Dung’s framework. | |
| Researchers ; Professionals ; Students ; General public ; Others | |
| http://hdl.handle.net/10993/24940 | |
| http://www-sop.inria.fr/members/Serena.Villata/Resources/aiia10.pdf |
| File(s) associated to this reference | ||||||||||||||
|
Fulltext file(s):
| ||||||||||||||
All documents in ORBilu are protected by a user license.
