gents are engaged in an argumentation process; deciding how to contribute
Résumé :
[en] When several agents are engaged in an argumentation process, they are faced with the problem of deciding how to contribute to the current state of the debate in order to satisfy their own goal, ie. to make an argument under a given semantics accepted or not. In this paper, we study the minimal changes (or target sets) on the current state of the debate that are required to achieve such a goal, where changes are the addition and/or deletion of attacks among arguments. We study some properties of these target sets, and propose a Maude specification of rewriting rules which allow to compute all the target sets for some types of goals
Disciplines :
Sciences informatiques
Auteur, co-auteur :
Kontarinis, Dionysios
Bonzon, Elise
Maudet, Nicolas
Perotti, Alan
VAN DER TORRE, Leon ; University of Luxembourg > Faculty of Science, Technology and Communication (FSTC) > Computer Science and Communications Research Unit (CSC)
Villata, Serana
Co-auteurs externes :
yes
Langue du document :
Anglais
Titre :
Rewriting Rules for the Computation of Goal-Oriented Changes in an Argumentation System
Bonzon, E., Maudet, N.: On the outcomes of multiparty persuasion. In: Proc. of AAMAS 2011, pp. 47-54 (2011)
Kontarinis, D., Bonzon, E., Maudet, N., Moraitis, P.: Picking the right expert to make a debate uncontroversial. In: Proc. of COMMA 2012, pp. 486-497 (2012)
Egilmez, S., Martins, J., Leite, J.: Extending social abstract argumentation with votes on attacks. In: Proc. of TAFA 2013 (to appear, 2013)
Amgoud, L., Cayrol, C.: On the acceptability of arguments in preference-based argumentation. In: Proc. of UAI 1998, pp. 1-7 (1998)
Modgil, S.: Revisiting abstract argumentation frameworks. In: Proc. of TAFA 2013 (to appear, 2013)
Boella, G., Gabbay, D.M., Perotti, A., van der Torre, L., Villata, S.: Conditional labelling for abstract argumentation. In: Modgil, S., Oren, N., Toni, F. (eds.) TAFA 2011. LNCS, vol. 7132, pp. 232-248. Springer, Heidelberg (2012)
Clavel, M., Durán, F., Eker, S., Lincoln, P., Martí-Oliet, N., Meseguer, J., Quesada, J.F.: The maude system. In: Narendran, P., Rusinowitch, M. (eds.) RTA 1999. LNCS, vol. 1631, pp. 240-243. Springer, Heidelberg (1999)
Villata, S., Boella, G., van der Torre, L.: Attack semantics for abstract argumentation. In: Walsh, T. (ed.) Proc. of IJCAI 2011, IJCAI/AAAI, pp. 406-413 (2011)
Modgil, S., Caminada, M.: Proof theories and algorithms for abstract argumentation frameworks. In: Argumentation in Artificial Intelligence, pp. 105-129. Springer US (2009)
Cayrol, C., de Saint-Cyr, F.D., Lagasquie-Schiex, M.C.: Change in abstract argumentation frameworks: Adding an argument. J. Artificial Intelligence Research (JAIR) 38, 49-84 (2010)
Baumann, R., Brewka, G.: Expanding argumentation frameworks: Enforcing and monotonicity results. In: COMMA 2010, pp. 75-86 (2010)
Liao, B., Jin, L., Koons, R.C.:Dynamics of argumentation systems: A division-based method. Artificial Intelligence 175(11), 1790-1814 (2011)
Baumann, R.: What does it take to enforce an argument? minimal change in abstract argumentation. In: ECAI 2012, pp. 127-132 (2012)
Coste-Marquis, S., Konieczny, S., Mailly, J.G., Marquis, P.: On the revision of argumentation systems: Minimal change of arguments status. In: Proc. of TAFA 2013 (to appear, 2013)
Bisquert, P., Cayrol, C., de Saint-Cyr, F.D., Lagasquie-Schiex, M.C.: Characterizing change in abstract argumentation systems. Technical report, IRIT-UPS (2013)
Bisquert, P., Cayrol, C., de Saint-Cyr, F.D., Lagasquie-Schiex, M.C.: Changements guidés par les buts en argumentation: Cadre théorique et outil. In: MFI 2013 (2013)
Dung, P.M.: On the acceptability of arguments and its fundamental role in nonmonotonic reasoning, logic programming and n-persons games. Artificial Intelligence 77, 321-357 (1995)
Jakobovits, H., Vermeir, D.: Robust semantics for argumentation frameworks. J. Log. Comput. 9(2), 215-261 (1999)
Caminada, M.: On the issue of reinstatement in argumentation. In: Fisher, M., van der Hoek, W., Konev, B., Lisitsa, A. (eds.) JELIA 2006. LNCS (LNAI), vol. 4160, pp. 111-123. Springer, Heidelberg (2006)
