Article (Scientific journals)
Comparing creative profiles: Architects, social scientists and the general population
Kirsch, Christiane; Lubart, Todd; Houssemand, Claude
2016In Personality and Individual Differences, 94, p. 284–289
Peer Reviewed verified by ORBi
 

Files


Full Text
Comparing Creative Profiles PAID.pdf
Publisher postprint (254.76 kB)
Request a copy

All documents in ORBilu are protected by a user license.

Send to



Details



Keywords :
Creativity; Fluid intelligence; Openness; Ego-strength; Arts; Science; Everyday life
Abstract :
[en] The aim of this article is to investigate the hybrid approach of creativity, according to which some features are more domain-general whereas others are more domain-specific. The total sample consisted of 359 participants. The hybrid approach was confirmed. Whereas fluid intelligence had a domain-general importance, the role of ego-strength was very domain-specific. Ego-strength was positively involved in adaptive creativity among student architects but negatively in creativity with the social science students: whereas student architects tended to show a “scientific” creative profile, social science students showed an “artistic” creative profile. Finally, as anticipated, people from the general population demonstrated the expected profile for everyday creativity.
Disciplines :
Theoretical & cognitive psychology
Author, co-author :
Kirsch, Christiane ;  University of Luxembourg > Faculty of Language and Literature, Humanities, Arts and Education (FLSHASE) > Education, Culture, Cognition and Society (ECCS)
Lubart, Todd;  Université Paris Descartes
Houssemand, Claude ;  University of Luxembourg > Faculty of Language and Literature, Humanities, Arts and Education (FLSHASE) > Education, Culture, Cognition and Society (ECCS)
External co-authors :
yes
Language :
English
Title :
Comparing creative profiles: Architects, social scientists and the general population
Publication date :
2016
Journal title :
Personality and Individual Differences
ISSN :
0191-8869
eISSN :
1873-3549
Publisher :
Elsevier
Volume :
94
Pages :
284–289
Peer reviewed :
Peer Reviewed verified by ORBi
Available on ORBilu :
since 10 February 2016

Statistics


Number of views
93 (9 by Unilu)
Number of downloads
2 (1 by Unilu)

Scopus citations®
 
8
Scopus citations®
without self-citations
7
OpenCitations
 
7
WoS citations
 
6

Bibliography


Similar publications



Contact ORBilu