Response: Commentary: “The Sexualized-Body-Inversion Hypothesis Revisited: Valid Indicator of Sexual Objectification or Methodological Artifact?”

Reference : Response: Commentary: “The Sexualized-Body-Inversion Hypothesis Revisited: Valid Indi...


	Document type :	Scientific journals : Article
	Discipline(s) :	Social & behavioral sciences, psychology : Social, industrial & organizational psychology
	To cite this reference:	http://hdl.handle.net/10993/21807

Title :	Response: Commentary: “The Sexualized-Body-Inversion Hypothesis Revisited: Valid Indicator of Sexual Objectification or Methodological Artifact?”
Language :	English
Author, co-author :	Schmidt, Alexander F. [University of Luxembourg > Faculty of Language and Literature, Humanities, Arts and Education (FLSHASE) > Integrative Research Unit: Social and Individual Development (INSIDE) >]
Publication date :	8-Sep-2015
Journal title :	Frontiers in Psychology
Publisher :	Switzerland Frontiers Research Foundation
Volume :	6
Pages :	1360
Peer reviewed :	Yes (verified by ORBi^lu)
e-ISSN :	1664-1078
City :	Pully
Country :	Switzerland
Permalink :	http://hdl.handle.net/10993/21807
DOI :	10.3389/fpsyg.2015.01360

File(s) associated to this reference

Fulltext file(s):

	File	Commentary	Version	Size	Access
Open access	Schmidt.2015.Response Commentary Sexualized Body Inversion Hypothesis.pdf		Publisher postprint	78.42 kB	View/Open

All documents in ORBi^lu are protected by a user license.