[en] When adjudicating on controversial cases, the European Court of Human Rights needs to navigate between the pitfalls of irrelevance and overreach. The concept of the European consensus is the Court's most reliable tool for finding the right direction.
Disciplines :
Droit européen & international
Auteur, co-auteur :
FAHNER, Johannes Hendrik ; University of Luxembourg > Faculty of Law, Economics and Finance (FDEF) > Law Research Unit
Langue du document :
Anglais
Titre :
Caught Between Irrelevance and Overreach: The Catch-22 of the Strasbourg Court
Date de publication/diffusion :
21 janvier 2015
Nom de la manifestation :
Interaction between Legal Systems Conference "Room for reflection"
