[en] As an integrated signal of mass transition and distribution, the Earth's gravity senses the inner and outer mass balance of the Earth. However gravity cannot be measured directly in space but can be derived from other measurements obtained by space vehicles. The dedicated gravity field satellite missions CHAMP, GRACE, and GOCE serve as spaceborne gravimeters by utilizing satellite-to-satellite tracking (SST) and satellite gravity gradiometry (SGG) techniques. In this decade of the geopotentials, these missions will serve different purposes with particular spatial and spectral resolutions. This paper introduces the usefulness of these missions, their impacts on the geosciences the measurement principles, and their implementations. These space sensors will provide a significant number of observations during their mission lifespans. Therefore, global gravity field recovery is a computationally demanding task. Several approaches aimed at this goal are discussed, namely the brute-force approach, the space-wise approach, the time-wise approach, and the proposed torus-based semi-analytical approach. The paper addresses the characteristics of each approach and focuses mainly on the torus-based semi-analytical approach, which can be used to derive the gravity field from any geopotential functional. In this approach, the structure of the normal matrix becomes block-diagonal which leads to a powerful and efficient recovery tool through the use of the fast Fourier transform (FFT). Important issues such as downward continuation, interpolation methods, and regularization approaches are also discussed. To demonstrate the feasibility and efficiency of the torus-based semi-analytical approach of gravity field determination in spaceborne gravimetry, disturbing potential data from CHAMP and GRACE and simulated GOCE gravity gradient tensor data are processed.
Ameele, J. 2004. GRACE data processing and orbit and ground track analysis. University of Calgary, Calgary, Alta., and Delft University of Technology, Delft, Netherlands. Technical Report.
Burrough, P.A., and McDonnell, R.A. 1998. Principles of geographical information systems- spatial information systems and geostatistics. Oxford University Press, New York.
Colombo, O.L. 1986. Notes on the mapping of the gravity field using satellite data. In lecture notes in earth sciences, mathematical and numerical techniques in physical geodesy. Edited by H. Sünkel. Springer, Berlin. Vol. 7, pp. 264-315.
European Space Agency. 1999. Gravity field and steady-state ocean circulation mission. European Space Agency (ESA) Publications Division, Noordwijk, Netherlands. SP-1233. 217 pp.
Földvary, L., Svehla, D., Gerlach, D., Wermuth, M., Gruber, T., Rummel, L., Rothacher, M., Frommknecht, B., Peters, T., and Steigenberger, P. 2005. Gravity model TUM-2sp based on the energy balance approach and kinematic CHAMP orbits. In Earth observation with CHAMP - results from three years in orbit. Edited by Ch. Reigber, H. Luhr, P. Schwintzer, and J. Wickert. Springer, Berlin, pp. 13-18.
Heiskancn, W.A., and Moritz, H. 1.967. Physical geodesy. Freeman, San Francisco, Calif.
Jekeli, C. 1999. The determination of gravitational potential differences from satellite-to-satellite tracking. Celestial Mechanics and Dynamical Astronomy, Vol. 75, pp. 85-101.
Kaula, W.M. 1966. Theory of satellite geodesy. Blaisdell Publishing Company, Waltham, Mass.
Keller, W., and Sharifi, M.A. 2005. Satellite gradiometry using a satellite pair. Journal of Geodesy, Vol. 78, pp. 544-557.
Khan, I., and Ohba, R. 1999. Closed form expression for the finite difference approximations of first and higher derivatives based on Taylor series. Journal of Computational and Applied Mathematics, Vol. 107, pp. 179-193.
Klees, R.A.P., Koop, R.J.J., Visser, P.N.A.M., and van den Ijssel, J. 2000. Efficient gravity field recovery from GOCE gravity gradient observations. Journal of Geodesy, Vol. 74, pp. 561-571.
Koop, R. 1993. Global gravity field modelling using satellite gravity gradiometry. Ph.D. dissertation, Technische Universiteit Delft, Delft, Netherlands.
Lemoine, F.G., Kenyon, S.C., Factor, J.K., Trimmer, R.G., Pavlis, N.K., Chinu, D.S., Cox, C.M., Klosko, S.M., Luthcke, S.B., Torrence, M.H., Wang, W.M., Williamson, R.G., Pavlis, E.C., Rapp, R.H., and Olson, T.R. 1.998. The development of the joint NASA, GSFC, and NIMA geopotential model EGM96. Goddard Space Flight Center, National Aeronautics and Space Administration (NASA), Greenbelt, Md. NASA-TP-1998-206861. 575 pp.
Moritz, H. 1980. Advanced physical geodesy. 2nd ed. Herbert Wichmann, Karlsrahe, Germany.
National Research Council. 1997. Satellite gravity and the geo-sphere: contributions to the study of the solid Earth and its fluid envelopes. National Academy Press, Washington, D.C.
Pail, R., Schuh, W.-D., and Wermuth, M. 2005. GOCE gravity field processing. In Gravity, Geoid and Space: GGSM 2004, Proceedings of the IAG International Symposium, 30 August - 3 September 2004, Porto, Portugal. Edited by C. Jekeli, L. Bastos, and J. Fernandes. Springer, Heidelberg, Germany. Vol. 129, pp. 36-41.
Pail, R., Schuh, W.-D., and Wermuth, M. 2007. GOCE gravity field analysis in the framework of HPF: operational software system and simulation results. In Proceedings of the 3rd International GOCE User Workshop, 6-8 November 2006, Frascati, Italy. Edited by K. Fletcher. European Space Agency (ESA) Publications Division, Noordwijk, Netherlands. ESA SP-627, pp. 249-256.
Reigber, C., Schwintzer, P., Neumayer, K.H., Barthelmes, F., Konig, R., Forste, C., Balmino, G., Biancale, R., Lemoine, J.-M., Loyer, S., Bruinsma, S., Perosanz, F., and Fayard, T. 2003. The CHAMP-only Earth gravity field model EIGEN-2. Advances in Space Research, Vol. 31, No. 8, pp. 1883-1888.
Reigber, C., Jochmann, H., Wunsch, J., Petrovic, S., Schwintzer, P., Barthelmes, F., Neumayer, K.-H., Konig, R., Forste, C., Balmino, G., Biancale, R., Lemoine, J.-M., Loyer, S., and Perosanz, E 2005a. Earth gravity field and seasonal variability from CHAMP. In Earth observation with CHAMP -results from three years in orbit. Edited by Ch. Reigber, H. Lühr, P. Schwintzer, and J. Wickert. Springer, Heidelberg, Germany, pp. 25-30.
Reigber, C., Schmidt, R., Flechtner, F., Konig, R., Meyer, U., Neumayer, K.-H., Schwintzer, P., and Zhu, S.Y. 2005b. An Earth gravity field model complete to degree and order 150 from GRACE: EIGEN-GRACE02S. Journal of Geodynamics, Vol. 39, No. 1, pp. 1-10.
Rummel, R., van Gelderen, M., Koop, R., Schrama, E., Sanso, F., Brovelli, M., Miggliaccio, F., and Sacerdote, F. 1993. Spherical harmonic analysis of satellite gradiometry. Netherlands Geodetic Commission, Delft, Netherlands. New Series 39.
Rummel, R., Balmino, G., Johannessen, J., Visser, P., and Woodworth, P. 2002. Dedicated gravity field missions - principles and aims. Journal of Geodynamics, Vol. 33, No. 1-2, pp. 3-22.
Rummel, R., Gruber, T., and Koop, R. 2004. High level processing facility for GOCE: products and processing strategy. In Proceedings of the 2nd International GOCE User Workshop, 8-10 March 2004, Frascati, Italy. European Space Agency (ESA) Publications Division, Noordwijk, Netherlands. ESA SP-569.
Seeber, G. 2003. Satellite geodesy. 2nd ed. Walter de Gruyter, Berlin. 589 pp.
SID. 2000. GOCE end-to-end performance analysis. Space Research Organization Netherlands (SRON), Utrecht, Institute for Astronomical and Physical Geodesy (IAPG), Munich, and Delft Institute for Earth. Oriented Space Research (DEOS), Delft, Consortium (SID). ESA/ESTEC Contract 12735/98/NL/GD
Sneeuw, N. 1992. Representation coefficients and their use in satellite geodesy. Manuscripta Geodaetica, Vol. 17, pp. 117-123.
Sneeuw, N. 2000a. A semi-analytical approach to gravity field analysis from satellite observations. Ph.D. dissertation, der Technischen Universität, Munich, Germany.
Sneeuw, N. 2000b. Dynamic satellite geodesy on the torus: block-diagonality from, a semi-analytical approach. In Gravity, geoid, and geodynamics 2000. Edited by M. Sideris. IAG, Springer-Verlag, Berlin. Vol. 1.23, pp. 137-142.
Sneeuw, N. 2003. Space-wise, time-wise, torus and Rosborough representations in gravity field modelling. Space Science Reviews, Vol. 108, pp. 37-46.
Sneeuw, N., and Bun, R. 1996. Global spherical harmonic computation by two-dimensional Fourier methods. Journal of Geodesy, Vol. 70, pp. 224-232.
Sneeuw, N., Gerlach, Ch., Földvary, L., Gruber, Th., Peters, T., Rummel, R., and Svehla, D. 2005. One year of time-variable CHAMP only gravity field models using kinematic orbits. In A window on the future of geodesy. Edited by F. Sansò. IAG, Springer, Berlin. IAG Symposia Proceedings Vol. 128, pp. 288-293.
Švehla, D., and Rothacher, M. 2005. Kinematic precise orbit determination for gravity field determination. In A window on the future of geodesy. Edited by F. Sansò. IAG, Springer, Berlin. IAG Symposia Proceedings Vol. 128, pp. 181-188.
Tapley, B.D., Bettadpur, S., Ries, J.C., Thompson, P.F., Watkins, M.M. 2004. GRACE measurements of mass variability in the Earth system. Science (Washington, D.C.), Vol. 305, pp. 503-505.
Tapley, B., Ries, B., Bettadpur, S., Chambers, D., Cheng, M., Condi, F., Gunter, B., Kang, Z., Nagel, P., Pastor, R., Pekker, T., Poole, S., and Wang, F. 2005. GGM02 - an improved Earth gravity field model from GRACE. Journal of Geodesy, Vol. 79, No. 8, pp. 467-478.
Tikhonov, V., and Arsenin, V.Y. 1977. Solution of ill-posed problems. John Wiley and Sons, New York.
Visser, P.N.A.M., Rummel, R., Balmino, G., Sunkel, H., Johannessen, J., Aguirre, M., Woodworth, P.L., Le Provost, C., Tscherning, C.C., and Sabadini, R. 2002. The European. Earth explorer mission GOCE: impact for the geosciences. In Ice sheets, sea level, and the dynamic earth. American Geophysical Union, Washington, D.C. Geodynamics Series 29, pp. 95-107.
Weigelt, M. 2006. Global and local gravity field recovery from satellite-to-satellite tracking. Ph.D. thesis, Department of Geomatics Engineering, University of Calgary, Calgary, Alta. Available from www.geomatics.ucalgary.ca/research/publications/GradTheses.html.
Wermuth, M., Gerlach, C., Svehla, D., and Földvary, L. 2004. Comparison of different gravity field solution methods applied to CHAMP gravity field modeling. In Proceedings of the 1st Workshop on International Gravity Field Research, 8-9 May 2004, Graz, Austria. Edited by B. Meurers and R. Pail. Zentralanstalt fur Meteorologie und Geodynamik, Vienna, pp. 45-50.
Wermuth, M., Rummel, R., and Földvary, L. 2006. Mission simulation and semi-analytical gravity field analysis for GOCE SGG and SST. In Observation of the Earth system from space. Edited by J. Flury, R. Rummel, C. Reigber, M. Rothacher, G. Boedecker, and U. Schreiber. Springer, Heidelberg, Germany, pp. 198-208.
Xu, C., Weigelt, M., Sneeuw, N., and Sideris, M.G. 2005. Gravity field recovery from a time-variable satellite ground track pattern. In Proceedings, Canadian Geophysical Union Scientific Annual Meeting, 9-12 May 2005, Banff, Alta. Canadian Geophysical Union (CGU).