Article (Scientific journals)
What about Inhibition in the Winsconsin Card Sorting Test?
Steinmetz, Jean-Paul; Houssemand, Claude
2011In The Clinical Neuropsychologist, 25 (4), p. 652-669
Peer reviewed
 

Files


Full Text
Steinmetz_2011_TCN.pdf
Publisher postprint (182.9 kB)
Request a copy

All documents in ORBilu are protected by a user license.

Send to



Details



Keywords :
response inhibition; WCST; go/no-go; stop-signal
Abstract :
[en] The commercially available Wisconsin Card Sorting Test (WCST) is one of the most commonly used tests for assessing executive functions within clinical settings. Importantly, however, it remains relatively unclear exactly what processes are assessed by the test. Conceptually, increased perseverative errors in sorting cards are usually related to deficient inhibition processes. Empirically, evidence supporting this conclusion is limited. In a sample of 38 healthy adults we addressed the question to what extent inhibition mechanisms assessed by the go/no-go and the stop-signal paradigm are related to WCST performances. Inhibition-related scores were found to predict non-perseverative errors better than perseverative errors. Consequently we conclude that the non-perseverative errors score reflects processes that are partly dependent on inhibition functions.
Disciplines :
Theoretical & cognitive psychology
Author, co-author :
Steinmetz, Jean-Paul 
Houssemand, Claude ;  University of Luxembourg > Faculty of Language and Literature, Humanities, Arts and Education (FLSHASE) > Educational Measurement and Applied Cognitive Science (EMACS)
Language :
English
Title :
What about Inhibition in the Winsconsin Card Sorting Test?
Publication date :
May 2011
Journal title :
The Clinical Neuropsychologist
ISSN :
1385-4046
eISSN :
1744-4144
Publisher :
Psychology Press, Oxford, United Kingdom
Volume :
25
Issue :
4
Pages :
652-669
Peer reviewed :
Peer reviewed
Available on ORBilu :
since 16 December 2013

Statistics


Number of views
96 (1 by Unilu)
Number of downloads
0 (0 by Unilu)

Scopus citations®
 
14
Scopus citations®
without self-citations
14
OpenCitations
 
9
WoS citations
 
14

Bibliography


Similar publications



Contact ORBilu