Monotonic and non-monotonic inference for abstract argumentation

Booth, Richard; Kaci, Souhila; Rienstra, Tjitze; van der Torre, Leon

Reference : Monotonic and non-monotonic inference for abstract argumentation


	Document type :	Scientific congresses, symposiums and conference proceedings : Paper published in a book
	Discipline(s) :	Engineering, computing & technology : Computer science
	To cite this reference:	http://hdl.handle.net/10993/10410

Title :	Monotonic and non-monotonic inference for abstract argumentation
Language :	English
Author, co-author :	Booth, Richard [University of Luxembourg > Interdisciplinary Centre for Security, Reliability and Trust (SNT) > >]
	Kaci, Souhila []
	Rienstra, Tjitze [University of Luxembourg > Faculty of Science, Technology and Communication (FSTC) > Computer Science and Communications Research Unit (CSC) >]
	van der Torre, Leon [University of Luxembourg > Faculty of Science, Technology and Communication (FSTC) > Computer Science and Communications Research Unit (CSC) >]
Publication date :	2013
Main document title :	Proceedings of the Twenty-Sixth International Florida Artificial Intelligence Research Society Conference, FLAIRS 2013
Peer reviewed :	Yes
Audience :	International
Event name :	26th International Florida Artificial Intelligence Research Society Conference (FLAIRS 2013)
Event date :	May 2013
Keywords :	[en] reasoning about the outcome ; argumentation framework
Abstract :	[en] We present a new approach to reasoning about the outcome of an argumentation framework, where an agent’s reasoning with a framework and semantics is represented by an inference relation defined over a logical labeling language. We first study a monotonic type of inference which is, in a sense, more general than an acceptance function, but equally expressive. In order to overcome the limitations of this expressiveness, we study a non-monotonic type of inference which allows counterfactual inferences. We precisely characterize the classes of frameworks distinguishable by the non-monotonic inference relation for the admissible semantics.
Target :	Researchers ; Professionals ; Students ; General public ; Others
Permalink :	http://hdl.handle.net/10993/10410
Other URL :	http://icr.uni.lu/rbooth/Papers_files/flairs_rienstra.pdf

File(s) associated to this reference

Fulltext file(s):

	File	Commentary	Version	Size	Access
Limited access	flairs_rienstra.pdf		Publisher postprint	214.55 kB	Request a copy

All documents in ORBi^lu are protected by a user license.

University of Luxembourg Library | Feedback | Legal notices