Article (Scientific journals)
A Comprehensive Study of Machine Learning Techniques for Log-Based Anomaly Detection
Ali, Shan; Boufaied, Chaima; BIANCULLI, Domenico et al.
2025In Empirical Software Engineering
Peer Reviewed verified by ORBi
 

Files


Full Text
emse2025.pdf
Author postprint (1.27 MB) Creative Commons License - Attribution
Download

All documents in ORBilu are protected by a user license.

Send to



Details



Keywords :
Computer Science - Software Engineering
Abstract :
[en] The growth of systems complexity increases the need of automated techniques dedicated to different log analysis tasks such as Log-based Anomaly Detection (LAD). The latter has been widely addressed in the literature, mostly by means of different deep learning techniques. Nevertheless, the focus on deep learning techniques results in less attention being paid to traditional Machine Learning (ML) techniques, which may perform well in many cases, depending on the context and the used datasets. Further, the evaluation of different ML techniques is mostly based on the assessment of their detection accuracy. However, this is is not enough to decide whether or not a specific ML technique is suitable to address the LAD problem. Other aspects to consider include the training and prediction time as well as the sensitivity to hyperparameter tuning. In this paper, we present a comprehensive empirical study, in which we evaluate different supervised and semi-supervised, traditional and deep ML techniques w.r.t. four evaluation criteria: detection accuracy, time performance, sensitivity of detection accuracy as well as time performance to hyperparameter tuning. The experimental results show that supervised traditional and deep ML techniques perform very closely in terms of their detection accuracy and prediction time. Moreover, the overall evaluation of the sensitivity of the detection accuracy of the different ML techniques to hyperparameter tuning shows that supervised traditional ML techniques are less sensitive to hyperparameter tuning than deep learning techniques. Further, semi-supervised techniques yield significantly worse detection accuracy than supervised techniques.
Research center :
Interdisciplinary Centre for Security, Reliability and Trust (SnT) > SVV - Software Verification and Validation
Disciplines :
Computer science
Author, co-author :
Ali, Shan
Boufaied, Chaima
BIANCULLI, Domenico  ;  University of Luxembourg > Interdisciplinary Centre for Security, Reliability and Trust (SNT) > SVV
Branco, Paula
Briand, Lionel
External co-authors :
yes
Language :
English
Title :
A Comprehensive Study of Machine Learning Techniques for Log-Based Anomaly Detection
Publication date :
23 June 2025
Journal title :
Empirical Software Engineering
ISSN :
1382-3256
eISSN :
1573-7616
Publisher :
Kluwer Academic Publishers, Netherlands
Peer reviewed :
Peer Reviewed verified by ORBi
Focus Area :
Security, Reliability and Trust
FnR Project :
FNR17373407 - LOGODOR - Automated Log Smell Detection And Removal, 2022 (01/09/2023-31/08/2026) - Domenico Bianculli
Name of the research project :
LOGODOR - Automated Log Smell Detection and Removal
Funders :
FNR - Luxembourg National Research Fund
Funding number :
C22/IS/17373407/LOGODOR
Funding text :
This work was supported by the Natural Sciences and Research Council of Canada (NSERC) Discov- ery Grant program, the Canada Research Chairs (CRC) program, the Mitacs Accelerate program, the Ontario Graduate Scholarship (OGS) program, and the Luxembourg National Research Fund (FNR), grant reference C22/IS/17373407/LOGODOR; Lionel Briand was partly funded by the Research Ireland grant 13/RC/2094-2. For the purpose of open access, and in fulfillment of the obligations arising from the grant agreement, the authors have applied a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International (CC BY 4.0) license to any Author Accepted Manuscript version arising from this submission.
Available on ORBilu :
since 22 November 2023

Statistics


Number of views
218 (20 by Unilu)
Number of downloads
136 (7 by Unilu)

Scopus citations®
 
0
Scopus citations®
without self-citations
0
OpenCitations
 
0
OpenAlex citations
 
1

Bibliography


Similar publications



Contact ORBilu