Smart charging; consumer data; data sharing; privacy concerns; monetary incentives
Résumé :
[en] Many governments worldwide aim to eventually replace most combustion engines on the roads with electric vehicles (EVs). But this change causes an additional load on the electrical grid, especially if many EVs are charged simultaneously at peak times. Smart charging is a solution to better distribute the load throughout the day or night, while considering consumer preferences. For home charging, the idea is for EV users to always plug in their EVs when they are at home, and for the energy supplier to then decide when to charge which EV. By using (sensitive) consumer data, such as charging history, location of the smartphone and calendar information, the energy supplier can plan and optimize the charging of the EVs even better. In a survey, we seek to understand which of these data consumers are willing to share for smart charging, and what factors, such as privacy concerns and data sharing habits, influence this decision. Furthermore, in an experiment within the survey, we investigate whether consumers are more willing to share data if they receive monetary incentives. Our research design is based on the theoretical framework of Barth and de Jong (2017). 20 participants took part in the pretest, after which we adjusted the survey. We then shared the survey through various channels.
Centre de recherche :
Interdisciplinary Centre for Security, Reliability and Trust (SnT) > FINATRAX - Digital Financial Services and Cross-organizational Digital Transformations
Disciplines :
Sciences informatiques Gestion des systèmes d’information
Auteur, co-auteur :
MARXEN, Hanna ; University of Luxembourg > Interdisciplinary Centre for Security, Reliability and Trust (SNT) > FINATRAX
Ansarin, Mohammad
Co-auteurs externes :
yes
Langue du document :
Anglais
Titre :
Smart charging of EVs: Would you share your data for money?
Date de publication/diffusion :
11 décembre 2022
Nom de la manifestation :
Pre-ICIS Workshop 2022
Lieu de la manifestation :
Copenhagen, Danemark
Date de la manifestation :
11-12-2022
Manifestation à portée :
International
Titre de l'ouvrage principal :
Smart charging of EVs: Would you share your data for money? Smart charging of EVs: Would you share your data for money?
Maison d'édition :
Pre-ICIS W orkshop Proceedings 2022
Peer reviewed :
Peer reviewed
Focus Area :
Security, Reliability and Trust
Objectif de développement durable (ODD) :
9. Industrie, innovation et infrastructure 11. Villes et communautés durables
Projet FnR :
FNR13342933 - Paypal-fnr Pearl Chair In Digital Financial Services, 2019 (01/01/2020-31/12/2024) - Gilbert Fridgen
Intitulé du projet de recherche :
U-AGR-8002 - Enovos Inductive - CORDY Maxime
Organisme subsidiant :
FNR - Fonds National de la Recherche Paypal Fondation Enovos
N° du Fonds :
13342933/Gilbert Fridgen
Subventionnement (détails) :
The authors thank Raviteja Chemudupaty for his feedback on this contribution. They gratefully
acknowledge the financial support of Fondation Enovos under the aegis of the Fondation de Luxembourg
in the research project INDUCTIVE. This research was in part funded by PayPal and the Luxembourg
National Research Fund FNR, Luxembourg (P17/IS/13342933/PayPal-FNR/Chair in DFS/ Gilbert
Fridgen).
Barth, S., & de Jong, M. D. T. (2017). The privacy paradox - Investigating discrepancies between expressed privacy concerns and actual online behavior - A systematic literature review. Telematics and Informatics, 34(7), 1038-1058. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tele.2017.04.013
Barth, S., de Jong, M. D. T., Junger, M., Hartel, P. H., & Roppelt, J. C. (2019). Putting the privacy paradox to the test: Online privacy and security behaviors among users with technical knowledge, privacy awareness, and financial resources. Telematics and Informatics, 41, 55-69. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tele.2019.03.003
Buckman, J. R., Bockstedt, J. C., & Hashim, M. J. (2019). Relative Privacy valuations under varying disclosure characteristics. Information Systems Research, 30(2), 375-388. https://doi.org/10.1287/isre.2018.0818
Cichy, P., Salge, T. O., Kohli, R., & William & Mary. (2021). Privacy concerns and data sharing in the internet of things: Mixed methods evidence from connected cars. MIS Quarterly, 45(4), 1863-1892. https://doi.org/10.25300/MISQ/2021/14165
Cohen, J. (2013). Statistical power analysis for the behavioral sciences. Routledge.
Curtice, J., & Bryson, C. (2012). The measurement of socio-political orientations (6th ed.). European Social Survey.
Döbelt, S., Jung, M., Busch, M., & Tscheligi, M. (2015). Consumers' privacy concerns and implications for a privacy preserving Smart Grid architecture-Results of an Austrian study. Energy Research & Social Science, 9, 137-145. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.erss.2015.08.022
Faul, F., Erdfelder, E., Lang, A.-G., & Buchner, A. (2007). G* Power 3: A flexible statistical power analysis program for the social, behavioral, and biomedical sciences. Behavior Research Methods, 39(2), 175-191. https://doi.org/10.3758/bf03193146
Hirschprung, R., Toch, E., Bolton, F., & Maimon, O. (2016). A methodology for estimating the value of privacy in information disclosure systems. Computers in Human Behavior, 61, 443-453. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2016.03.033
Huber, J., Schaule, E., Jung, D., & Weinhardt, C. (2019). Quo vadis smart charging? A literature review and expert survey on technical potentials and user acceptance of smart charging systems. World Electric Vehicle Journal, 10(4), 1-19. https://doi.org/10.3390/wevj10040085
IEA. (2022). Global EV Outlook 2022 Securing supplies for an electric future (pp. 1-221).
IRENA. (2019). Innovation Landscape brief: Electric-vehicle smart charging. International Renewable Energy Agency (IRENA). https://books.google.lu/books?id=Kh0DEAAAQBAJ
Kim, D., Park, K., Park, Y., & Ahn, J.-H. (2019). Willingness to provide personal information: Perspective of privacy calculus in IoT services. Computers in Human Behavior, 92, 273-281. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2018.11.022
López-Bonilla, L. M., & López-Bonilla, J. M. (2016). From the new environmental paradigm to the brief ecological paradigm: A revised scale in golf tourism. Anatolia, 27(2), 227-236. https://doi.org/10.1080/13032917.2015.1100128
Marxen, H., Chemudupaty, R., Graf-Drasch, V., Fridgen, G., & Schoepf, M. (2022). Towards an evaluation of incentives and nudges for smart charging. ECIS.
Schomakers, E.-M., Biermann, H., & Ziefle, M. (2021). Users' preferences for smart home automation-investigating aspects of privacy and trust. Telematics and Informatics, 64, 101689.
Smith, H. J. (2008). Information privacy and its management. MIS Quarterly Executive, 3(4), 6.
Smith, H. J., Dinev, T., & Xu, H. (2011). Information privacy research: An interdisciplinary review. MIS Quarterly, 35(4), 989-1015. https://doi.org/10.2307/41409970
Soper, D. S. (2022). A-priori sample size calculator for structural equation models [Software]. https://www.danielsoper.com/statcalc
Westland, J. C. (2010). Lower bounds on sample size in structural equation modeling. Electronic Commerce Research and Applications, 9(6), 476-487. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.elerap.2010.07.003
Wu, P. F., Vitak, J., & Zimmer, M. T. (2020). A contextual approach to information privacy research. Journal of the Association for Information Science and Technology, 71(4), 485-490. https://doi.org/10.1002/asi.24232
