University students’ friendship networks: Ambivalence and the role of attachment and personality

Schwind, Lena; ALBERT, Isabelle

doi:10.1007/s43076-022-00200-8

Request a copy

Article (Scientific journals)

University students’ friendship networks: Ambivalence and the role of attachment and personality

Schwind, Lena; ALBERT, Isabelle

2022 • In Trends in Psychology, online first, p. 1-21

Peer Reviewed verified by ORBi

Permalink
https://hdl.handle.net/10993/53999

DOI
10.1007/s43076-022-00200-8

Files (1)Send to Details Statistics Bibliography Similar publications

Files

Full Text

Schwind_et_al-2022-Trends_in_Psychology.pdf

Publisher postprint (888.62 kB)

Request a copy

All documents in ORBilu are protected by a user license.

Send to

RIS BibTex APA Chicago Permalink X Linkedin

Details

Keywords :

ambivalence; attachment; personality; relationship; friendship; university students; secure; fearful; agreeableness; neuroticism

Abstract :

[en] Given the importance of friendships throughout the life span and the possible experience of ambivalence within these relationships, the present study aims at examining the role that attachment and personality dimensions may play in this experience. University students (N = 87) completed an online survey, including the Big Five Inventory-10 (BFI-10), the Attachment Style Questionnaire (ASQ), as well as a two-item scale and an emotion checklist as two measures of ambivalence towards their friends. The correlation analysis revealed significant correlations between the ambivalence measures and secure attachment, fearful attachment, neuroticism, and agreeableness. A subsequent regression analysis demonstrated that fearful attachment, neuroticism, agreeableness, and gender can explain a considerable amount of variation in the degree of ambivalence. The results indicate that both certain attachment dimensions and certain personality dimensions predict the experience of ambivalence, although their importance may vary depending on the object of ambivalence.

Disciplines :

Social, industrial & organizational psychology

Author, co-author :

Schwind, Lena

ALBERT, Isabelle ; University of Luxembourg > Faculty of Humanities, Education and Social Sciences (FHSE) > Department of Behavioural and Cognitive Sciences (DBCS)

External co-authors :

Language :

English

Title :

University students’ friendship networks: Ambivalence and the role of attachment and personality

Publication date :

07 July 2022

Journal title :

Trends in Psychology

ISSN :

2358-1883

Publisher :

Sociedade Brasileira de Psicologia, Brazil

Volume :

online first

Pages :

1-21

Peer reviewed :

Peer Reviewed verified by ORBi

Additional URL :

https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s43076-022-00200-8#Abs1

Available on ORBilu :

since 23 January 2023

Statistics

Number of views

45 (0 by Unilu)

Number of downloads

0 (0 by Unilu)

More statistics

Scopus citations^®

Scopus citations^®
without self-citations

OpenCitations

Bibliography

Albert, I., & Ferring, D. (2012). Intergenerational value transmission within the family and the role of emotional relationship quality. Family Science, 3(1), 4–12. 10.1080/19424620.2011.671496 DOI: 10.1080/19424620.2011.671496
Albert, I., Abbey, E., & Valsiner, J. (2018). General introduction: Looking at relations across generations. In I. Albert, E. Abbey & J. Valsiner (Eds.), Perspectives on Human Development: Trans-Generational Family Relations: Investigating Ambivalences (pp. xiii–xxx). Information Age Publishing.
Albert, I., Ferring, D., & Michels, T. (2013). Intergenerational family relations in Luxembourg. European Psychologist, 18(1), 59–69. 10.1027/1016-9040/a000125 DOI: 10.1027/1016-9040/a000125
Bartholomew, K. (1990). Avoidance of intimacy: An attachment perspective. Journal of Social and Personal Relationships, 7(2), 147–178. 10.1177/0265407590072001 DOI: 10.1177/0265407590072001
Bartholomew, K., & Horowitz, L. M. (1991). Attachment styles among young adults: A test of a four-category model. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 61(2), 226–244. DOI: 10.1037/0022-3514.61.2.226
Bernier, A., Larose, S., & Whipple, N. (2005). Leaving home for college: A potentially stressful event for adolescents with preoccupied attachment patterns. Attachment & Human Development, 7(2), 171–185. 10.1080/14616730500147565 DOI: 10.1080/14616730500147565
Blieszner, R. (2016). Friendships. In S. Krauss Whitbourne (Ed.), The Encyclopedia of Adulthood and Aging (pp. 1–5). John Wiley & Sons, Inc. https://doi.org/10.1002/9781118521373.wbeaa298
Boll, T., Ferring, D., & Filipp, S. H. (2003). Perceived parental differential treatment in middle adulthood: Curvilinear relations with individuals’ experienced relationship quality to sibling and parents. Journal of Family Psychology, 17(4), 472–487. 10.1037/0893-3200.17.4.472 DOI: 10.1037/0893-3200.17.4.472
Buote, V. M., Pancer, S. M., Pratt, M. W., Adams, G., Birnie-Lefcovitch, S., Polivy, J., & Wintre, M. G. (2007). The importance of friends: Friendship and adjustment among 1st-year university students. Journal of Adolescent Research, 22(6), 665–689. 10.1177/0743558407306344 DOI: 10.1177/0743558407306344
Clark, M. S., & Graham, S. M. (2005). Do relationship researchers neglect singles? Can we do better? Psychological Inquiry,16(2/3), 131–136. https://www.jstor.org/stable/20447275
Costa, P. T., & McCrae, R. R. (1992). Neo PI-R professional manual. Odessa, FL: Psychological Assessment Resources.
Doroszuk, M., Kupis, M., Czarna, A. Z. (2019). Personality and friendships. In V. Zeigler-Hill & T. K. Shackelford (Eds.), Encyclopedia of Personality and Individual Differences (pp. 1–9). Springer International Publishing. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-28099-8_712-1
Fingerman, K. L., Chen, P. C., Hay, E., Cichy, K. E., & Lefkowitz, E. S. (2006). Ambivalent reactions in the parent and offspring relationship. The Journals of Gerontology: Series B, 61(3), P152–P160. 10.1093/geronb/61.3.P152 DOI: 10.1093/geronb/61.3.P152
Fingerman, K. L., Hay, E. L., & Birditt, K. S. (2004). The best of ties, the worst of ties: Close, problematic, and ambivalent social relationships. Journal of Marriage and Family, 66(3), 792–808. 10.1111/j.0022-2445.2004.00053.x DOI: 10.1111/j.0022-2445.2004.00053.x
Freeman, H., & Brown, B. B. (2001). Primary attachment to parents and peers during adolescence: Differences by attachment style. Journal of Youth and Adolescence, 30, 653–674. 10.1023/A:1012200511045 DOI: 10.1023/A:1012200511045
Goedert, C., Albert, I., Barros, S., & Ferring, D. (2019). Welcome or not? – Natives’ security feelings, attachment and attitudes toward acculturation of immigrants. International Journal of Intercultural Relations, 69, 24–31. 10.1016/j.ijintrel.2018.12.001 DOI: 10.1016/j.ijintrel.2018.12.001
Gouvedari, E. (2018). The Research Act. In I. Albert, E. Abbey, & J. Valsiner (Eds.), Perspectives on Human Development: Trans-Generational Family Relations: Investigating Ambivalences (pp. 21–29). Information age publishing.
Grabill, C. M., & Kerns, K. A. (2000). Attachment style and intimacy in friendship. Personal Relationships, 7(4), 363–378. 10.1111/j.1475-6811.2000.tb00022.x DOI: 10.1111/j.1475-6811.2000.tb00022.x
Harris, K., & Vazire, S. (2016). On friendship development and the Big Five personality traits. Social and Personality Psychology Compass, 10(11), 647–667. 10.1111/spc3.12287 DOI: 10.1111/spc3.12287
Hazan, C., & Shaver, P. R. (1994). Attachment as an organizational framework for research on close relationships. Psychological Inquiry, 5(1), 1–22. 10.1207/s15327965pli0501_1 DOI: 10.1207/s15327965pli0501_1
Hofstra, J. (2009). Attaching cultures: The role of attachment styles in explaining majority members’ acculturation attitudes. s.n.
Hollstein, B. & Pfeffer, J. (2010). Netzwerkkarten als Instrument zur Erhebung egozentrierter Netzwerke [Network cards as tools for collecting egocentric networks]. [Proceedings of the 34th Congress of the German Sociological Association]. http://www.pfeffer.at/egonet/Hollstein%20Pfeffer.pdf
Holt-Lunstad, J., Uchino, B. N., Smith, T. W., & Hicks, A. (2007). On the importance of relationship quality: The impact of ambivalence in friendships on cardiovascular functioning. Annals of Behavioral Medicine, 33(3), 278–290. 10.1007/BF02879910 DOI: 10.1007/BF02879910
Kahn, R.L. & Antonucci, T.C. (1980). Convoys over the life course: Attachment, roles, and social support. In P.B. Baltes & O. Brim (Eds.), Life span development and behavior (Vol. 3, pp. 253–286). Academic Press.
Laghai, A., & Joseph, S. (2000). Attitudes towards emotional expression: Factor structure, convergent validity and associations with personality. British Journal of Medical Psychology, 73(3), 381–384. 10.1348/000711200160598 DOI: 10.1348/000711200160598
Leiner, D. J. (2019). SoSci Survey (Version 3.1.06) [Computer software]. https://www.soscisurvey.de
Lettke, F. & Klein, D. M. (2003). Methodological issues in assessing ambivalences in intergenerational relations. In K. Pillemer & K. Lüscher (Eds.), Contemporary Perspectives in Family Research: Vol. 4. Intergenerational Ambivalences: New Perspectives on Parent-Child Relations in Later Life (pp. 85–113). Emerald Publishing Limited. https://doi.org/10.1016/S1530-3535(03)04004-4
Lubiewska, K. (2018). Attachment ambivalence. In I. Albert, E. Abbey, & J. Valsiner (Eds.), Perspectives on Human Development: Trans-Generational Family Relations: Investigating Ambivalences (pp. 283–307). Information Age Publishing.
Lüscher, K. (2002). Intergenerational ambivalence: Further steps in theory and research. Journal of Marriage and Family, 64(3), 585–593. https://www.jstor.org/stable/3599926
McCrae, R. R., & John, O. P. (1992). An introduction to the five-factor model and its applications. Journal of Personality, 60(2), 175–215. 10.1111/j.1467-6494.1992.tb00970.x DOI: 10.1111/j.1467-6494.1992.tb00970.x
Michels, T., Albert, I., & Ferring, D. (2011). Psychologische Ambivalenz in Eltern-Kind-Beziehungen: Entwicklung und Teststatistische Überprüfung eines Instrumentes zur direkten Konstruktabbildung [Psychological ambivalence in parent-child relations: On the development and the psychometric evaluation of a questionnaire for direct assessment]. Diagnostica, 57(1), 39–51. 10.1026/0012-1924/a000031 DOI: 10.1026/0012-1924/a000031
Mikulincer, M., Shaver, P. R., Bar-On, N., & Ein-Dor, T. (2010). The pushes and pulls of close relationships: Attachment insecurities and relational ambivalence. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 98(3), 450–468. 10.1037/a0017366 DOI: 10.1037/a0017366
Mund, M., Jeronimus, B. F., & Neyer, F. J. (2017). Personality and social relationships: As thick as thieves. PsyArXiv. 10.31234/osf.io/gm8qv DOI: 10.31234/osf.io/gm8qv
Neyer, F. J., Wrzus, C., Wagner, J., & Lang, F. R. (2011). Principles of relationship differentiation. European Psychologist, 16(4), 267–277. 10.1027/1016-9040/a000055 DOI: 10.1027/1016-9040/a000055
Noftle, E. E., & Shaver, P. R. (2006). Attachment dimensions and the Big Five personality traits: Associations and comparative ability to predict relationship quality. Journal of Research in Personality, 40(2), 179–208. 10.1016/j.jrp.2004.11.003 DOI: 10.1016/j.jrp.2004.11.003
Oswald, D. L., & Clark, E. M. (2003). Best friends forever?: High school best friendships and the transition to college. Personal Relationships, 10(2), 187–196. 10.1111/1475-6811.00045 DOI: 10.1111/1475-6811.00045
Ozer, D. J., & Benet-Martinez, V. (2006). Personality and the prediction of consequential outcomes. Annual Review of Psychology, 57, 401–421. 10.1146/annurev.psych.57.102904.190127 DOI: 10.1146/annurev.psych.57.102904.190127
Picton, Kahu, E. R., & Nelson, K. J. (2017). Friendship supported learning – the role of friendships in first-year students’ university experiences. Student Transitions Achievement Retention and Success (STARS) Conference. https://unistars.org/papers/STARS2017/08A.pdf
Pillemer, K., Suitor, J. J., Mock, S. E., Sabir, M., Pardo, T. B., & Sechrist, J. (2007). Capturing the complexity of intergenerational relations: Exploring ambivalence within later-life families. Journal of Social Issues, 63(4), 775–791. 10.1111/j.1540-4560.2007.00536.x DOI: 10.1111/j.1540-4560.2007.00536.x
Pinquart, M., Stotzka, C., & Silbereisen, R. K. (2008). Personality and ambivalence in decisions about becoming parents. Social Behavior and Personality: An International Journal, 36(1), 87–96. 10.2224/sbp.2008.36.1.87 DOI: 10.2224/sbp.2008.36.1.87
Pinquart, M., Stotzka, C., & Silbereisen, R. K. (2009). Entwicklung von Instrumenten zur Erfassung von Ambivalenz gegenüber dem Eingehen einer Partnerschaft [Development of two instruments for assessment of ambivalence concerning the beginning of an intimate relationship]. ZfF–Zeitschrift für Familienforschung/Journal of Family Research, 21(2), 194–207.
Rammstedt, B., & John, O. P. (2007). Measuring personality in one minute or less: A 10-item short version of the Big Five Inventory in English and German. Journal of Research in Personality, 41(1), 203–212. 10.1016/j.jrp.2006.02.001 DOI: 10.1016/j.jrp.2006.02.001
Schneider, I. K., & Schwarz, N. (2017). Mixed feelings: The case of ambivalence. Current Opinion in Behavioral Sciences, 15, 39–45. 10.1016/j.cobeha.2017.05.012 DOI: 10.1016/j.cobeha.2017.05.012
Shaver, P. R., & Brennan, K. A. (1992). Attachment styles and the Big Five personality traits: Their connections with each other and with romantic relationship outcomes. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 18(5), 536–545. 10.1177/0146167292185003 DOI: 10.1177/0146167292185003
Singleton, R. A., & Vacca, J. (2007). Interpersonal competition in friendships. Sex Roles, 57(9), 617–627. 10.1007/s11199-007-9298-x DOI: 10.1007/s11199-007-9298-x
Suitor, J. J., Gilligan, M., & Pillemer, K. (2011). Conceptualizing and measuring intergenerational ambivalence in later life. The Journals of Gerontology, Series b: Psychological Sciences and Social Sciences, 66(6), 769–781. 10.1093/geronb/gbr108 DOI: 10.1093/geronb/gbr108
Thompson, M. M., & Zanna, M. P. (1995). The conflicted individual: Personality-based and domain specific antecedents of ambivalent social attitudes. Journal of Personality, 63(2), 259–288. 10.1111/j.1467-6494.1995.tb00810.x DOI: 10.1111/j.1467-6494.1995.tb00810.x
Thompson, M. M., Zanna, M. P., & Griffin, D. W. (1995). Let’s not be indifferent about (attitudinal) ambivalence. In R. E. Petty & J. A. Krosnick (Eds.), Ohio State University series on attitudes and persuasion: Vol. 4. Attitude strength: Antecedents and consequences (pp. 361–386). Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Inc.
Uchino, B. N., Cawthon, R. M., Smith, T. W., Light, K. C., McKenzie, J., Carlisle, M., Gunn, H., Birmingham, W., & Bowen, K. (2012). Social relationships and health: Is feeling positive, negative, or both (ambivalent) about your social ties related to telomeres? Health Psychology, 31(6), 789–796. 10.1037/a0026836 DOI: 10.1037/a0026836
Uchino, B. N., Holt-Lunstad, J., Smith, T. W., & Bloor, L. (2004). Heterogeneity in social networks: A comparison of different models linking relationships to psychological outcomes. Journal of Social and Clinical Psychology, 23(2), 123–139. 10.1521/jscp.23.2.123.31014 DOI: 10.1521/jscp.23.2.123.31014
Van Oudenhoven, J.-P., & Hofstra, J. (2004). Attachment styles questionnaire (ASQ). Department of Psychology, University of Groningen.
Wilcox, P., Winn, S., & Fyvie-Gauld, M. (2005). ‘It was nothing to do with the university, it was just the people’: The role of social support in the first-year experience of higher education. Studies in Higher Education, 30(6), 707–722. 10.1080/03075070500340036 DOI: 10.1080/03075070500340036
Wrzus, C., Wagner, J., & Neyer, F. J. (2012). The interdependence of horizontal family relationships and friendships relates to higher well-being. Personal Relationships, 19(3), 465–482. 10.1111/j.1475-6811.2011.01373.x DOI: 10.1111/j.1475-6811.2011.01373.x
Wrzus, C., Zimmermann, J., Mund, M., Neyer, F. J. (2017). Friendships in young and middle adulthood: Normative patterns and personality differences. In M. Hojjat, & A. Moyer (Eds.), The Psychology of Friendship (pp. 21–38). Oxford University Press. https://doi.org/10.1093/acprof:oso/9780190222024.003.0002
Zayas, V., Surenkok, G., & Pandey, G. (2017). Implicit ambivalence of significant others: Significant others trigger positive and negative evaluations. Social and Personality Psychology Compass, 11(11), Article e12360. https://doi.org/10.1111/spc3.12360