Reference : Opinion Statement ECJ-TF 3/2021 on the ECJ Decision of 19 March 2021 in MK v. Autorid... |
Scientific journals : Article | |||
Law, criminology & political science : Tax law Law, criminology & political science : European & international law | |||
Law / European Law | |||
http://hdl.handle.net/10993/50718 | |||
Opinion Statement ECJ-TF 3/2021 on the ECJ Decision of 19 March 2021 in MK v. Autoridade Tributária e Aduaneira (Case C-388/19) on the Option of Taxpayers to Avoid Discriminatory Taxation of Capital Gains | |
English | |
Kofler, Georg [] | |
Garcia Prats, Alfredo [] | |
Haslehner, Werner ![]() | |
Heydt, Volker [] | |
Kemmeren, Eric [] | |
Nogueira, Joao [] | |
Panayi, Christiana HJI [] | |
Richelle, Stella [] | |
Rust, Alexander [] | |
Mar-2022 | |
European Taxation | |
International Bureau of Fiscal Documentation | |
121-126 | |
Yes (verified by ORBilu) | |
International | |
0014-3138 | |
2352-9199 | |
Amsterdam | |
Netherlands | |
[en] Free movement of capital ; capital gains taxation ; real estate taxation ; discrimination of non-residents | |
[en] In this case note, the CFE ECJ Task Force comments on the ECJ decision in MK v. Autoridade Tributária e Aduaneira (Case C-388/19) of 18 March 2021. The Court confirmed its previous case law and held that the Portuguese (optional) regime for taxation of capital gains from immovable property of non-residents was contrary to the free movement of capital under article 63 of the TFEU since non-residents were taxed less favourably than residents. | |
Researchers ; Professionals ; Students | |
http://hdl.handle.net/10993/50718 |
File(s) associated to this reference | ||
Fulltext file(s): | ||
All documents in ORBilu are protected by a user license.