Reference : Transgression of Taboos in Postdramatic Theater. Productive Aesthetics of Risk
Scientific journals : Article
Arts & humanities : Performing arts
Multilingualism and Intercultural Studies
http://hdl.handle.net/10993/42169
Transgression of Taboos in Postdramatic Theater. Productive Aesthetics of Risk
English
Nonoa, Koku Gnatuloma mailto [University of Luxembourg > Faculty of Language and Literature, Humanities, Arts and Education (FLSHASE) > Identités, Politiques, Sociétés, Espaces (IPSE) >]
2018
Concordia Discors vs Discordia Concors : Researches into Comparative Literature, Contrastive Linguistics, Cross-Cultural and Translation Strategies
99–115
Yes
International
2065-4057
2065-4057
[en] postdramatic theater ; aesthetics of risk ; performativity
[en] This contribution analyzes Aristotle’s influence on the modern understanding of theater (based on the concept of the drama script) as a restriction and reduction of the potentiality of theater. Therefore, it presents a comparative analysis of the objectives of the antique theatrical practices around the 6th and 5th centuries B.C. (before Aristotle) and Schlingensief’s “Action 18, Kill Politic” (2002). It provides also a transcultural examination that helps explain the meaning of the postdramatic transgression of taboos, its productive aesthetics of risk, and its social and political potentiality. Thus, the performance “Action 18, Kill Politic” is analyzed as a process-oriented and experience-based aesthetic of risk as well as a ‘social drama’ in everyday life.
Researchers ; Professionals ; Students
http://hdl.handle.net/10993/42169
http://cejsh.icm.edu.pl/cejsh/element/bwmeta1.element.cejsh-9d43b8b7-f197-41ce-a575-8a8da5e524d1

File(s) associated to this reference

Fulltext file(s):

FileCommentaryVersionSizeAccess
Open access
Transgression_of_Taboos_in_Postdramatic.pdfPublisher postprint428.57 kBView/Open

Bookmark and Share SFX Query

All documents in ORBilu are protected by a user license.