ne bis in idem; EU criminal law; conflicts of jurisdiction; Menci; Di Puma; Garlsson; CJEU; administrative law; A and B v. Norway
Résumé :
[en] This chapter analyses the conceptual roots of extended ne bis in
idem protection and, in particular, how the concept of ‘criminal charge’ developed
by the ECtHR impacts the interpretative outcomes of the CJEU and the ECtHR
respectively. The chapter will then present the specific case law of the two Courts
on extended ne bis in idem, including the latest developments, and will offer an
assessment of the consequences of this jurisprudence for transnational cases in the
Area of Freedom, Security and Justice (AFSJ). In particular, the transnational application
of extended ne bis in idem requires a reconceptualisation and rethinking of
the legal framework for preventing and resolving conflicts of criminal jurisdiction
in the AFSJ.
Disciplines :
Droit pénal & procédure pénale
Auteur, co-auteur :
LIGETI, Katalin ; University of Luxembourg > Faculty of Law, Economics and Finance (FDEF)
Co-auteurs externes :
no
Langue du document :
Anglais
Titre :
Fundamental rights protection between Strasbourg and Luxembourg: Extending Transnational ne bis in idem Across Administrative and Criminal Procedures
Date de publication/diffusion :
2018
Titre de l'ouvrage principal :
Preventing and Resolving Conflicts of Jurisdiction in EU Criminal Law
