ne bis in idem; EU criminal law; conflicts of jurisdiction; Menci; Di Puma; Garlsson; CJEU; administrative law; A and B v. Norway
Abstract :
[en] This chapter analyses the conceptual roots of extended ne bis in
idem protection and, in particular, how the concept of ‘criminal charge’ developed
by the ECtHR impacts the interpretative outcomes of the CJEU and the ECtHR
respectively. The chapter will then present the specific case law of the two Courts
on extended ne bis in idem, including the latest developments, and will offer an
assessment of the consequences of this jurisprudence for transnational cases in the
Area of Freedom, Security and Justice (AFSJ). In particular, the transnational application
of extended ne bis in idem requires a reconceptualisation and rethinking of
the legal framework for preventing and resolving conflicts of criminal jurisdiction
in the AFSJ.
Disciplines :
Criminal law & procedure
Author, co-author :
Ligeti, Katalin ; University of Luxembourg > Faculty of Law, Economics and Finance (FDEF)
External co-authors :
no
Language :
English
Title :
Fundamental rights protection between Strasbourg and Luxembourg: Extending Transnational ne bis in idem Across Administrative and Criminal Procedures
Publication date :
2018
Main work title :
Preventing and Resolving Conflicts of Jurisdiction in EU Criminal Law
