Reference : Performance of combined fragmentation and retention prediction for the identification...
Scientific journals : Article
Physical, chemical, mathematical & earth Sciences : Multidisciplinary, general & others
Systems Biomedicine
Performance of combined fragmentation and retention prediction for the identification of organic micropollutants by LC-HRMS.
Hu, Meng [> >]
Muller, Erik [> >]
Schymanski, Emma mailto [University of Luxembourg > Luxembourg Centre for Systems Biomedicine (LCSB) >]
Ruttkies, Christoph [> >]
Schulze, Tobias [> >]
Brack, Werner [> >]
Krauss, Martin [> >]
Analytical and bioanalytical chemistry
Yes (verified by ORBilu)
[en] Environmental contaminants ; Fragmentation prediction ; LC-HRMS ; Micropollutants ; Retention prediction ; Structure elucidation
[en] In nontarget screening, structure elucidation of small molecules from high resolution mass spectrometry (HRMS) data is challenging, particularly the selection of the most likely candidate structure among the many retrieved from compound databases. Several fragmentation and retention prediction methods have been developed to improve this candidate selection. In order to evaluate their performance, we compared two in silico fragmenters (MetFrag and CFM-ID) and two retention time prediction models (based on the chromatographic hydrophobicity index (CHI) and on log D). A set of 78 known organic micropollutants was analyzed by liquid chromatography coupled to a LTQ Orbitrap HRMS with electrospray ionization (ESI) in positive and negative mode using two fragmentation techniques with different collision energies. Both fragmenters (MetFrag and CFM-ID) performed well for most compounds, with average ranking the correct candidate structure within the top 25% and 22 to 37% for ESI+ and ESI- mode, respectively. The rank of the correct candidate structure slightly improved when MetFrag and CFM-ID were combined. For unknown compounds detected in both ESI+ and ESI-, generally positive mode mass spectra were better for further structure elucidation. Both retention prediction models performed reasonably well for more hydrophobic compounds but not for early eluting hydrophilic substances. The log D prediction showed a better accuracy than the CHI model. Although the two fragmentation prediction methods are more diagnostic and sensitive for candidate selection, the inclusion of retention prediction by calculating a consensus score with optimized weighting can improve the ranking of correct candidates as compared to the individual methods. Graphical abstract Consensus workflow for combining fragmentation and retention prediction in LC-HRMS-based micropollutant identification.

File(s) associated to this reference

Fulltext file(s):

Limited access
Meng_consensus-paper_submitted170929.pdfAuthor preprint2.07 MBRequest a copy

Bookmark and Share SFX Query

All documents in ORBilu are protected by a user license.