Boyson, N., Stahel, C., Stulz, R., Hedge fund contagion and liquidity shocks. J. Finance 65:5 (2010), 1789–1816.
Berger, S., Gleisner, F., Emergence of financial intermediaries in electronic markets: the case of online P2P lending. BuR Bus. Res. 2:1 (2009), 39–65.
Butler, A., Cornaggia, J., Gurun, U., Do local capital market conditions affect consumers’ borrowing decisions?. Manag. Sci. 63:12 (2017), 4175–4187.
Carhart, M., On persistence in mutual fund performance. J. Finance 52:1 (1997), 57–82.
Cramer, J., Krueger, A., Disruptive change in the taxi business: the case of uber. Am. Econ. Rev. Pap. Proc. 106:5 (2016), 177–182.
De Roure, C., Pelizzon, L., Tasca, P., How does P2P lending fit into the consumer credit market?. 2016, Deutsche Bundesbank Working paper.
Dorfleitner, G., Priberny, C., Schuster, S., Stoiber, J., Weber, M., de Castro, I., Kammler, J., Description-text related soft information in peer-to-peer lending – Evidence from two leading European platforms. J. Bank. Financ. 64:2 (2016), 169–187.
Emekter, R., Tu, Y., Jirasakuldech, B., Lu, M., Evaluating credit risk and loan performance in online peer-to-peer (P2P) lending. Appl. Econ. 47:1 (2015), 54–70.
Erel, I., The effect of bank mergers on loan prices: evidence from the United States. Rev. Finan. Stud. 24:4 (2011), 1068–1101.
Fama, E., French, K., Common risk factors in the returns on stocks and bonds. J. Financ. Econ. 33:1 (1993), 3–56.
Fama, E., French, K., Multifactor explanations of asset pricing anomalies. J. Finance 51:1 (1996), 55–84.
Fama, E., French, K., Dissecting anomalies with a five-factor model. Rev. Financ. Stud. 29:1 (2016), 69–103.
Hertzberg, A., Liberman, A., Paravisini, D., Screening on loan terms: evidence from maturity choice in consumer credit. Rev. Financ. Stud. 31:9 (2018), 3532–3567.
Herzenstein, M., Sonenshein, S., Dholakia, U., Tell me a good story and I may lend you money: the role of narratives in peer-to-peer lending decisions. J. Mark. Res. 48 (2011), 138–149.
Iyer, R., Khwaja, A., Luttmer, E., Shue, K., Screening peers softly: inferring the quality of small borrowers. Manag. Sci. 62:6 (2015), 1554–1577.
Kahn, C., Pennacchi, G., Sopranzetti, B., Bank consolidation and the dynamics of consumer loan interest rates. J. Bus. 78:1 (2005), 99–133.
Lin, M., Prabhala, N., Viswanathan, S., Judging borrowers by the company they keep: friendship networks and information asymmetry in online peer-to-peer lending. Manag. Sci. 59:1 (2013), 17–35.
Lin, M., Viswanathan, S., Home bias in online investments: an empirical study of an online crowdfunding market. Manag. Sci. 62:5 (2015), 1393–1414.
Metrick, A., Yasuda, A., The economics of private equity funds. Rev. Financ. Stud. 23:6 (2010), 2303–2341.
Michels, J., Do unverifiable disclosures matter? Evidence from peer-to-peer lending. Account. Rev. 87:4 (2012), 1385–1413.
Miller, S., Information and default in consumer credit markets: evidence from a natural experiment. J. Financ. Intermediation 24:1 (2015), 45–70.
Milne, A., Parboteeah, P., The business models and economics of peer-to-peer lending, 2016, Centre for European Policy Studies Working paper.
Morse, A., Peer-to-peer crowdfunding: information and the potential for disruption in consumer lending. Annu. Rev. Financ. Econ. 7 (2015), 463–482.
Pastor, L., Stambaugh, R., Liquidity risk and expected stock returns. J. Political Econ. 111:3 (2003), 642–685.
Rice, T., Strahan, P., Does credit competition affect small-firm finance?. J. Finance 65:3 (2010), 861–889.
Serrano-Cinca, C., Gutiérrez-Nieto, B., López-Palacios, L., Determinants of default in P2P lending. PLoS One, 10(10), 2015, e0139427.
Schwert, M., Does borrowing from banks cost more than borrowing from the market?. J. Finance 75:2 (2020), 905–947.
Tang, H., Peer-to-peer lenders versus banks: substitutes or complements?. Rev. Finan. Stud. 32:5 (2019), 1900–1938.
VentureBeat. Lending Club brings person-to-person loans to Facebook. 2007 https://venturebeat.com/business/lending-club-brings-person-to-person-loans-to-facebook/.
Wei, Z., Lin, M., Market mechanisms in online peer-to-peer lending. Manag. Sci. 63:12 (2016), 4236–4257.
