ALLEGREZZA, S., militello elena, COVOLO, V., & ROMANO, L. (2021). APPROCHE COMPARATIVE DES ASPECTS DE LA PROCÉDURE PÉNALE. In donini massimo, Bin Ludovico, ... Diamanti Francesco, MODÈLES EUROPÉENS DE MESURES DE RÉCOMPENSE POUR LA PRÉVENTION DU TERRORISME INTERNATIONAL. Napoli, Italy: Jovene. Editorial reviewed |
ALLEGREZZA, S., COVOLO, V., MILITELLO, E., & ROMANO, L. (2021). Comparative approach to criminal procedure aspects. In Bin Ludovico, Diamanti Ludovico, ... Donini Massimo (Ed.), PREVENTING INTERNATIONAL TERRORISM EUROPEAN MODELS OF REWARDING MEASURES FOR JUDICIAL COOPERATORS (pp. 417-433). Napoli, Italy: jovene. Editorial reviewed |
Covolo, V. (2019). Monnaies virtuelles, nouvelle frontière dans la lutte contre le blanchiment d’argent et le financement du terrorisme. Droit Pénal et Procédure Pénale: Revue Luxembourgeoise. Peer reviewed |
Covolo, V. (2019). Luxembourg. In S. Ruggeri & S. Quattrocolo (Ed.), Personal Participation in Criminal Proceedings. A Comparative Study of Participatory Safeguards and in absentia Trials in Europe (pp. 279 – 304). Springer. |
Allegrezza, S., & Covolo, V. (Eds.). (2018). Effective Defence Rights in Criminal Proceedings. A European and Comparative Study on judicial remedies. Wolters Kluwer. |
Allegrezza, S., & Covolo, V. (2018). DIRECTIVE 2012/13/EU ON THE RIGHT TO INFORMATION IN CRIMINAL PROCEEDINGS. In S. Allegrezza & V. Covolo, EFFECTIVE DEFENCE RIGHTS IN CRIMINAL PROCEEDINGS A European and Comparative Study on Judicial Remedies (pp. 51-62). Wolters Kluwer/CEDAM. Peer reviewed |
Covolo, V. (2018). Judicial Protection of the Right to Access a Lawyer in the Member States. In S. Allegrezza & V. Covolo, Effective Defence Rights in Criminal Proceedings. A European and Comparative Study on judicial remedies. Luxembourg, Luxembourg: Wolters Kluwer CEDAM. Peer reviewed |
Covolo, V. (2018). Luxembourg. In S. Allegrezza & V. Covolo, Effective Defence Rights in Criminal Proceedings. A European and Comparative Study on judicial remedies. Luxembourg, Luxembourg: Wolters Kluwer CEDAM. Peer reviewed |
Covolo, V. (2018). Guarantees of Judicial Protection under the ECHR: What interactions with EU Law? In S. Allegrezza & V. Covolo, Effective Defence Rights in Criminal Proceedings. A European and Comparative Study on judicial remedies. Wolter Kluwer CEDAM. Peer reviewed |
Covolo, V. (2018). Mutual Recognition and absolute standards of judicial Protection. In S. Allegrezza & V. Covolo, Effective Defence Rights in Criminal Proceedings. A European and Comparative Study on judicial remedies. Luxembourg, Luxembourg: Wolter Kluwer CEDAM. Peer reviewed |
Covolo, V. (2018). Ensuring the Effectiveness of Defence Rights: Remedial Obligations under the ABC Directives. In S. Allegrezza & V. Covolo, Effective Defence Rights in Criminal Proceedings. A European and Comparative Study on judicial remedies. Luxembourg, Luxembourg: Wolter Kluwer CEDAM. Peer reviewed |
Allegrezza, S., & Covolo, V. (2018). CONCLUSIONS. In S. Allegrezza & V. Covolo (Eds.), EFFECTIVE DEFENCE RIGHTS IN CRIMINAL PROCEEDINGS A European and Comparative Study on Judicial Remedies (pp. 499-510). Wolters Kluwer/CEDAM. Peer reviewed |
Covolo, V. (2017). La notion autonome et protéiforme d’autorité judiciaire en droit de l’Union. Implications critiques des arrêts de la CJEU Poltorak, Kovalkovas et Özçelik. Kritische Vierteljahresschrift für Gesetzgebung und Rechtswissenschaft, (3), 217-229. |
Covolo, V. (2017). Regulation 833/2013 concerning Investigations Conducted by OLAF: A Missed Opportunity for Substantial Reforms? European Criminal Law Review, (2), 151-176. Peer Reviewed verified by ORBi |
Allegrezza, S., & Covolo, V. (2016). The directive 2012/13/EU on the right to information in criminal proceedings: Status quo or step forward? In Z. Durdevic & E. Ivicevic Karas (Eds.), European Criminal Procedure law in service of protection if the Union financial interests: State of Play and Challanges (pp. 41-51). Zagreb, Croatia: Croatian Association of European Criminal law. Peer reviewed |
Covolo, V. (2016). L’échange d’informations entre autorités administratives et judiciaires. Premiers éclaircissements tirés de l’arrêt Webmindlicences, C-419/14. Eucrim, (3). |
Allegrezza, S., & Covolo, V. (2015). Politique criminelle et droits de la defense en Italie. Archives de politique criminelle, 37, 279-320. Peer reviewed |
Covolo, V. (2015). L’émergence d’un droit pénal en réseau. Analyse critique du système européen de lutte antifraude. Nomos. |
Covolo, V. (2014). Le cadre légal régissant l'Office européen de lutte antifraude. Réflexions pour la construction d'un système pénal européen [Doctoral thesis, Unilu - University of Luxembourg]. ORBilu-University of Luxembourg. https://orbilu.uni.lu/handle/10993/17481 |
Covolo, V. (2012). From Europol to Eurojust – Towards a European Public Prosecutor. Where does OLAF fit in ?, Eucrim (2012/02), pp. 83 – 88. Eucrim, (2), 83-88. |
Covolo, V. (2011). The legal framework of OLAF's investigations. What lessons for the European penal area ? New Journal of European Criminal Law, 2, 201-219. doi:10.1177/203228441100200207 Peer reviewed |
Covolo, V. (2011). Et la judiciarisation de l’espace pénal de l’Union fut … Mais où se cache le juge pénal européen ? Cahiers de Droit Européen, (1), 103-154. Peer reviewed |
Braum, S., & Covolo, V. (2010). Le droit pénal européen et l’échange de renseignements en matière fiscale : conséquences sur le secret bancaire en droit luxembourgeois. Annales de Droit luxembourgeois. |