[en] This chapter examines the rules applicable to influencer marketing, and whether the five selected social media platforms (YouTube, Facebook, Instagram, Snapchat, and Pinterest) themselves comply with the relevant legal obligations. The first part elucidates the laws governing hidden marketing in Germany and the United Kingdom, in particular the implementing laws and associated case law under the Unfair Commercial Practices Directive. It then compares and assesses the platforms’ standard terms by deploying an empirical legal approach, namely content analysis. It is revealed that some platforms comply almost entirely with the determined rules, while others do not address disclosures at all. The chapter argues that platform governance through private regulation is suitable to address some of the concerns of hidden influencer marketing, but that a multifaceted approach is necessary, building upon the wealth of policy options considered by European and national regulators.
European & international law
Author, co-author :
Pflücke, Felix ; University of Luxembourg > Faculty of Law, Economics and Finance (FDEF) > Department of Law (DL)
External co-authors :
Making influencers honest: the role of social media platforms in regulating disclosures
Arunesh Mathur, Arvind Narayanan and Mashini Chetty, 'Endorsements on Social Media: An Empirical Study of Affiliate Marketing Disclosures on YouTube and Pinterest' (2018) (2) Proceedings of the ACM on Human-Computer Interaction 119.
Gönenç Gürkaynak, Ç. Olgu Kama and Burcu Ergün, 'Navigating the Uncharted Risks of Covert Advertising in Influencer Marketing' (2018) 39(1) Business Law Review 17;
Laura Bladow, 'Worth the Click: Why Greater FTC Enforcement Is Needed to Curtail Deceptive Practices in Influencer Marketing' (2018) 59(3) William and Mary Law Review 1123.
Florencia Marotta-Wurgler et al., 'Does Anyone Read the Fine Print? Consumer Attention to Standard-Form Contracts' (2014) 43(1) The Journal of Legal Studies 1, 31-32.
David S Evans, 'Governing Bad Behavior by Users of Multi-Sided Platforms' (2012) 27 Berkeley Technology Law Journal 1201;
Tarleton Gillespie, ‘Platforms Are Not Intermediaries’ (2018) 2 Georgetown Law Technology Review 198, 198-200.
Hans-W Micklitz et al., European Consumer Law (2nd edn, Intersentia 2014) 70-76;
Stephen Weatherill, EU Consumer Law and Policy (Edward Elgar Publishing 2013) 238-239.
Lisa Webley, 'Qualitative Approaches to Empirical Legal Research' in Peter Cane and Herbert Kritzer (eds), The Oxford Handbook of Empirical Legal Research (Oxford University Press 2010).
Rowena Vasquez-Sosas, 'The Language of Agreement: A Content Analysis of Employment Contracts' (2017) 12(2) Journal of Humanities and Social Science 2279.
Frans Leeuw, 'Empirical Legal Research: The Gap between Facts and Values and Legal Academic Training' (2015) 11(2) Utrecht Law Review 19;
Gijs van Dijck et al., 'Empirical Legal Research in Europe: Prevalence, Obstacles, and Interventions' (2018) 2 Erasmus Law Review 105.
Erling Hjelmeng, 'Competition Law Remedies: Striving for Coherence or Finding New Ways?' (2013) 50(4) Common Market Law Review 1007.
Giuditta Cordero-Moss, 'Standard Contract Terms as an Alternative to Legislation' in Christian Twigg-Flesner (ed), Research Handbook on EU Consumer and Contract Law (Edward Elgar Publishing 2016).