[en] This study is a part of the Skoltech University project to deploy a swarm of four identical 3U CubeSats in LEO. The CubeSats are to be equipped with gamma-ray sensors and their collective behavior will be exhibited in detecting gamma-ray bursts and coordinated attitude control. We consider a fully magnetic attitude control system, comprising a magnetometer as a part of attitude determination routine and three orthogonal magnetorquers as actuators. Having implemented and tested the conventional three-axis magnetic attitude determination and control algorithms, we proceed to study how the performance of such ADCS may be enhanced by using measurements and state vectors exchange. We interpolate the exchanged data, using the Kriging algorithm in conjunction with Extended Kalman filter and Lyapunov-based controller, since it provides the auto correlation and variance information about the environment of the magnetic field, which is of utmost importance for heterogeneous and noisy fields. In our simulations we compare the performance of the controller for a single satellite to that of the satellite in the swarm of CubeSats, which maintains the form of a regular tetrahedron and carries out distributed measurements with interpolation. Improved attitude stabilization for the latter scenario is demonstrated by mean squared errors.
Disciplines :
Ingénierie aérospatiale
Auteur, co-auteur :
Afanasev, A.; Space Center, Skolkovo Institute of Science and Technology, Bolshoy Boulevard 30, bld. 1, Moscow, 121205, Russian Federation
Ivanov, A.
MAHFOUZ, Ahmed ; University of Luxembourg > Interdisciplinary Centre for Security, Reliability and Trust (SNT) > Automation
Pritykin, D.
F., Graziani
Co-auteurs externes :
yes
Titre :
Attitude control algorithms in a swarm of cubesats: Kriging interpolation and coordinated data exchange
D. Selva, A. Golkar, O. Korobova, I. L. i. Cruz, P. Collopy, and O. De Weck, “Distributed earth satellite systems: What is needed to move forward?,” Journal of Aerospace Information Systems, Vol. 14, No. 8, 2017, pp. 412–438.
C. Araguz, E. Bou-Balust, and E. Alarcón, “Applying autonomy to distributed satellite systems: Trends, challenges, and future prospects,” Systems Engineering, Vol. 21, No. 5, 2018, pp. 401–416, 10.1002/sys.21428.
S. Lem, Summa Technologiae. Suite 290 111 Third Avenue South, Minneapolis: Univ Of Minnesota Press, 1st ed., 2013.
A. Farrag, T. Mahmoud, and A. Y. ELRaffiei, “Satellite swarm survey and new conceptual design for Earth observation applications,” The Egyptian Journal of Remote Sensing and Space Science, 2019, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ejrs.2019.12.003.
F. Fiore, L. Burderi, T. D. Salvo, M. Feroci, C. Labanti, M. R. Lavagna, and S. Pirrotta, “HERMES: a swarm of nano-satellites for high energy astrophysics and fundamental physics,” Space Telescopes and Instrumentation 2018: Ultraviolet to Gamma Ray (J.-W. A. d. Herder, S. Nikzad, and K. Nakazawa, eds.), Vol. 10699, International Society for Optics and Photonics, SPIE, 2018.
A. Annenkova, S. Biktimirov, K. Latyshev, A. Mahfouz, P. Mukhachev, and D. Pritykin, “Cubesat ADCS model for preliminary design procedures within a concurrent design approach,” AIP Conference Proceedings, Vol. 2171, No. 140005, 2019.
Y. Menshenin, K. Latyshev, A. Mahfouz, and D. Pritykin, “Applying the model-based conceptual design approach to ADCS development: A case study of a CubeSat swarm mission,” Proceedings of the International Astronautical Congress, IAC, Vol. 2019-October, No. IAC-19 D1 2 8 x50723, 2019.
A. Mahfouz, D. Pritykin, A. Afanasev, A. Annenkova, and K. Latyshev, “Coordinated attitude determination and control in a swarm of CubeSats,” Proceedings of the International Astronautical Congress, IAC, Vol. 2019-October, No. IAC-19 C1 6 9 x52687, 2019.
D. Ivanov, M. Ovchinnikov, V. Penkov, D. Roldugin, D. Doronin, and A. Ovchinnikov, “Advanced numerical study of the three-axis magnetic attitude control and determination with uncertainties,” Acta Astronautica, Vol. 132, 2017, pp. 103–110
M. Desouky, K. Prabhu, and O. Abdelkhalik, “On spacecraft magnetic attitude control,” Space Flight
Mechanics Meeting, 2018, No. 210009, 2018.
M. Ovchinnikov, D. Roldugin, D. Ivanov, and V. Penkov, “Choosing control parameters for three axis magnetic stabilization in orbital frame,” Acta Astronautica, Vol. 116, 2015, pp. 74–77.
R.E. Kalman, R.S. Bucy, “New results in linear filtering and prediction theory,” Trans. ASME, Ser. D. J. Basic Eng., Vol. 83, 1961, pp. 95–108.
D. Ivanov, M. Ovchinnikov, N. Ivlev, and S. Karpenko, “Analytical study of microsatellite attitude determination algorithms,” Acta Astronautica, Vol. 116, 2015, pp. 339–348.
J. J. Guzman and A. Edery, “Mission design for the MMS tetrahedron formation,” 2004 IEEE Aerospace Conference Proceedings (IEEE Cat. No.04TH8720), Vol. 1, March 2004, p. 540 Vol.1.
S. Shestakov, M. Ovchinnikov, and Y. Mashtakov, “Analytical Approach to Construction of Tetrahedral Satellite Formation,” Journal of Guidance, Control, and Dynamics, Vol. 42, No. 12, 2019, pp. 2600–2614.
T.C. Bailey, A.C. Gatrell, Interactive Spatial Data Analysis. Informa PLC, 5 Howick Place, London: Routledge, 1st ed., 1995.
K. M. Campbell, “Comparing Accuracies of Spatial Interpolation Methods on 1-Minute Ground Magnetometer Readings,” Master’s thesis, North Dakota State University, North Dakota, 2017.
