Reference : Opinion Statement ECJ-TF 1/2022 on the ECJ Decision of 25 November 2021 in État Luxem...
Scientific journals : Article
Law, criminology & political science : Tax law
Law, criminology & political science : European & international law
Law / European Law
http://hdl.handle.net/10993/52220
Opinion Statement ECJ-TF 1/2022 on the ECJ Decision of 25 November 2021 in État Luxembourgeois v. L (Case C-437/19) on the Conditions for Information Requests and Taxpayer Remedies
English
Kofler, Georg []
García Prats, Alfredo []
Haslehner, Werner mailto [University of Luxembourg > Faculty of Law, Economics and Finance (FDEF) > Department of Law (DL) >]
Heydt, Volker []
Kemmeren, Eric []
Lang, Michael []
Nogueira, Joao []
Panayi, Christiana []
Raventos-Calvo, Stella []
Richelle, Isabelle []
Rust, Alexander []
Shiers, Rupert []
Apr-2022
European Taxation
International Bureau of Fiscal Documentation
62
4
219-223
Yes
International
0014-3138
2352-9199
Amsterdam
Netherlands
[en] Foreseeable relevance ; European tax ; exchange of information ; fundamental rights
[en] In the judgment commented on in this article, the Court of Justice clarified the conditions for the identification of a taxpayer in group requests under the DAC (Directive 2011/16) and confirmed that article 47 of the Charter on Fundamental Rights requires the information holder to be given the necessary information to assess the request’s legality.
Researchers ; Professionals ; Students
http://hdl.handle.net/10993/52220

File(s) associated to this reference

Fulltext file(s):

FileCommentaryVersionSizeAccess
Limited access
et_2022_4 - Opinion Statement ECJ-TF 1_2022 on the ECJ Decision of 25 November 2021 in État Luxembourgeois v. L (Case C-437_19) on the Conditions for Information Requests and Taxpayer Remedies.pdfPublisher postprint137.28 kBRequest a copy

Bookmark and Share SFX Query

All documents in ORBilu are protected by a user license.