Paper published in a book (Scientific congresses, symposiums and conference proceedings)
Detecting “slippery slope” and other argumentative stances of opposition using tree kernels in monologic discourse
Liga, Davide; Palmirani, Monica
2019In International Joint Conference on Rules and Reasoning
Peer reviewed
 

Files


Full Text
Detecting “Slippery Slope” and Other Argumentative Stances of Opposition Using Tree Kernels in Monologic Discourse.pdf
Publisher postprint (361.75 kB)
Request a copy

All documents in ORBilu are protected by a user license.

Send to



Details



Keywords :
Argument Mining; Tree kernels; Argument schemes
Abstract :
[en] The aim of this study is to propose an innovative methodology to classify argumentative stances in a monologic argumentative context. Particularly, the proposed approach shows that Tree Kernels can be used in combination with traditional textual vectorization to discriminate between different stances of opposition without the need of extracting highly engineered features. This can be useful in many Argument Mining sub-tasks. In particular, this work explores the possibility of classifying opposition stances by training multiple classifiers to reach different degrees of granularity. Noticeably, discriminating support and opposition stances can be particularly useful when trying to detect Argument Schemes, one of the most challenging sub-task in the Argument Mining pipeline. In this sense, the approach can be also considered as an attempt to classify stances of opposition that are related to specific Argument Schemes.
Disciplines :
Computer science
Author, co-author :
Liga, Davide ;  University of Luxembourg > Faculty of Science, Technology and Medecine (FSTM)
Palmirani, Monica
External co-authors :
yes
Language :
English
Title :
Detecting “slippery slope” and other argumentative stances of opposition using tree kernels in monologic discourse
Publication date :
2019
Event name :
RuleML+RR 2019
Event date :
From 16-09-2019 to 19-09-2019
Main work title :
International Joint Conference on Rules and Reasoning
Publisher :
Springer, Cham
Pages :
180-189
Peer reviewed :
Peer reviewed
Focus Area :
Computational Sciences
Commentary :
International Joint Conference on Rules and Reasoning
Available on ORBilu :
since 20 September 2022

Statistics


Number of views
47 (3 by Unilu)
Number of downloads
0 (0 by Unilu)

OpenCitations
 
1

Bibliography


Similar publications



Contact ORBilu